The Asian Journal of Horticulture

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Triticum aestivum L. Varietal Accession Evaluation under Low Fertility and Two Irrigations


Affiliations
1 Department of Agriculture, Bhagwant University, Ajmer (Rajasthan), India
2 Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Bhagwant University, Ajmer (Rajasthan), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The experiment consisted of 9 treatments viz., T0 (DBW-17), T1 (Raj 3077), T2 (HD 2967), T3 (Lok-1), T4 (Raj 1482), T5 (Raj 4120), T6 (K-65) T7 (HD 2967), T8(PBW-343) laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The study showed that Lok-1 variety gave highest grain yield (2.76t ha-1), harvest index (31.15%), highest net income (Rs. 110,000.7 ha-1) and benefit: cost (3.74) then the rest of the varieties. The plant height was found to be the highest under the treatment T3 (Lok-1) at 30, 60 and 90DAS the differences were statistically significant. Treatment T1 (Raj 3077) recorded significantly higher number of effective tillers per meter square than all the other treatments, while the lowest number of effective tillers per meter squarewas recorded for the treatment T3 (Lok-1). The spike length was recorded to be highest under the treatment T3 (Lok-1) which was significantly higher than all these other treatments, while the lowest spike length was recorded under the treatment T5 (Raj 4120). Number of grains spike-1 was recorded to be highest under the treatment T6 (K-65), while the lowest grains spike-1 was recorded under the treatment T0 (DBW-17). Treatment T2 (HD2967) recorded significantly higher test weight than all the other treatments, while the lowest test weight was recorded under the treatment T8 (PBW-343). The highest grain yield was recorded under the treatment T3 (Lok-1), while the lowest grain yield was recorded in treatment T0 (DBW-343) and the differences were statistically non-significant.

Keywords

CGR, MOP, RGR, SSR, Harvest Index, NS.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abdul, Aziz Khakwani, Dennett, M.D., Munir, M. and Abid, M. (2012). Growth and yield response of wheat varieties to water stress. Pak. J. Bot., 44(3): 879-886.

  • Ajit, S., Nehra, Hooda, I.S. and Singh, K.P. (2001). Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J. Agron., 46(1): 112-117.

  • Bhunia, S.R. and Singh, V. (2000). Scheduling of irrigation to wheat (Triticum aestivum) under shallow water table conditions. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 70(7): 494-495.

  • Chaturvedi, I. (2006). Effects of different nitrogen levels on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Int. J. Agric. Sci., 2(2): 372-374.

  • Dewal, G.S. and Pareek, R.G. (2004). Effect of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J. Agron., 49(3): 160-162.

  • Dhaka, A.K., Bangarwa, A.S., Pannu, R.K., Garg and Ramprakash (2007). Effect of irrigation levels on consumptive water use soil moisture extraction pattern and water use efficiency of different wheat genotypes. Indian J. Agric. Res., 41(3): 220-223.

  • Donald, C.M. (1962). In search of yield. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci., 28: 171-178.

  • Fisher, R.A. (1921). On the ‘probable error’ of a coefficient deduced from a small sample. Metron, 1: 2-32.

  • Fisher, R.A. (1950). Statistical methods for research workers, Oliver and Boyd. Edinburg, London, UNITED KINGDOM

  • Kaur, Pannu R.K. (2008). Effect of sowing time and nitrogen schedules on phenology, yield and thermal-use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 78(4): 366-369.

  • Kaur, Pannu R.K. and Buttar, G.S. (2010). Impact of nitrogen application on the performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and nitrogen use efficiency under different dates of sowing. Indian J. Agron., 55(1): 40-45.

  • Kumar, M., Sheoran, P. and Yadav, A. (2010). Productivity potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in relation to different planting methods and nitrogen management strategies. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 80(5): 427-429.

  • Maurya, Prakash, Kumar, Vinay, Maurya, K. K., Kumawat, Narendra, Kumar, Rakesh and Yadav, M.P. (2014). Effect of potassium application on growth and yield of wheat varieties. Bioscan, 9(4): 1371-1373.

  • Mishra, A.K. and Tripathi, P. (2010). Effect of irrigation frequencies on yield and water use efficiency of wheat varieties. Pantnagar J. Res., 8(1): 1-4. 10 ref. AN: 20113047509.

  • Saren, B.K. and Jana, P.K. (2001). Effect of depth of irrigation and level and time of nitrogen application on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J. Agron., 46(2): 227-232.

  • Sarma, A., Singh, H., Pannu, R.K., Nanwal, R.K. and Singh, K.P. (2006). Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and nutrient uptake in wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) Emend. Fiori & Paol.] under adequate and limited irrigation. Haryana J. Agron., 22(1): 1-4.

  • Sarma, A., Singh, H., Pannu, R.K., Nanwal, R.K. and Singh, K.P. (2007). Effect of integrated nutrient management on grain yield, consumptive water use and water-use efficiency of wheat [Triticum aestivum(L.) Emend Fiorie Paol] under adequate and limited water supply. Haryana J. Agron., 23(1&2): 1-5.

  • Sarwar, N., Maqsood, M., Mubeen, K., Shehzad, M., Bhullar, M.S., Qamar, R. and Akbar, N. (2010). Effect of different levels of irrigation on yield and yield components of wheat cultivars. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 47(3): 371-374.

  • Sharma, P.K., Yadav, G.L., Sharma, B.L. and Kumar, S. (2000). Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to nitrogen and zinc fertilization. Indian J. Agron., 45(1): 124-127.

  • Shivani, Verma, U.N., Pal, S.K., Thakur, R. and Kumar, S. (2001). Production potential and water-use efficiency of wheat cultivars under different dates of seeding and irrigation levels. Indian J. Agron., 46(4): 659-664.

  • Singh, R. and Agarwal, S.K. (2001). Growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) as influenced by levels of farmyard manure and nitrogen. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 46(3): 462-467.


Abstract Views: 335

PDF Views: 1




  • Triticum aestivum L. Varietal Accession Evaluation under Low Fertility and Two Irrigations

Abstract Views: 335  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Rajendra Manda
Department of Agriculture, Bhagwant University, Ajmer (Rajasthan), India
Devendra Singh
Department of Agriculture, Bhagwant University, Ajmer (Rajasthan), India
Bhanwar Lal Jat
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Bhagwant University, Ajmer (Rajasthan), India

Abstract


The experiment consisted of 9 treatments viz., T0 (DBW-17), T1 (Raj 3077), T2 (HD 2967), T3 (Lok-1), T4 (Raj 1482), T5 (Raj 4120), T6 (K-65) T7 (HD 2967), T8(PBW-343) laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The study showed that Lok-1 variety gave highest grain yield (2.76t ha-1), harvest index (31.15%), highest net income (Rs. 110,000.7 ha-1) and benefit: cost (3.74) then the rest of the varieties. The plant height was found to be the highest under the treatment T3 (Lok-1) at 30, 60 and 90DAS the differences were statistically significant. Treatment T1 (Raj 3077) recorded significantly higher number of effective tillers per meter square than all the other treatments, while the lowest number of effective tillers per meter squarewas recorded for the treatment T3 (Lok-1). The spike length was recorded to be highest under the treatment T3 (Lok-1) which was significantly higher than all these other treatments, while the lowest spike length was recorded under the treatment T5 (Raj 4120). Number of grains spike-1 was recorded to be highest under the treatment T6 (K-65), while the lowest grains spike-1 was recorded under the treatment T0 (DBW-17). Treatment T2 (HD2967) recorded significantly higher test weight than all the other treatments, while the lowest test weight was recorded under the treatment T8 (PBW-343). The highest grain yield was recorded under the treatment T3 (Lok-1), while the lowest grain yield was recorded in treatment T0 (DBW-343) and the differences were statistically non-significant.

Keywords


CGR, MOP, RGR, SSR, Harvest Index, NS.

References