Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Have Domestic Banks Declined in Operating Efficiency for the Decade Ending 2013-14:CIR and DEA Approaches


Affiliations
1 Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
2 Sinhagad Institute of Management, Pune, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Indian banks are expected to play a key role in the envisaged economic growth of the country and economic leadership of developing economies assumed in the current decade. Banking sector has shown a tremendous growth post economic reforms in 1991. Both Public Sector and Private banks, together comprising of the Domestic banks; have played a very important role in the mobilization of savings, financial services provision and financing of sustainable economic growth. However, there are some consistent problems being faced by domestic banks over the last two decades. As a result the decade ending 2013‒14 has seen these banks facing problems like diminishing profitability and stressed assets. A major reason for this is the suspected diminishing productivity and efficiency of domestic banks over the decade, in spite of business growth and expansion. The study uses both CIR and the non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis approaches to examine the fact of diminishing productivity and efficiency of domestic banks over the decade. It is further established that the main contributors to the overall decline are the Public Sector banks as compared to the Private Sector Banks.

Keywords

Domestic Banks, Productivity, Efficiency, Cost-Income Ratio, DEA, Student's T-Test.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Soteriou, A. and Zenios T.A. (1997), Efficiency, Profitability and Quality of Banking services. [Online], 30 Pages Available: http://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/97/zenios.pdf
  • Bader, M.K., Mohamad, S. and Ariff, M. (2008), Cost, Revenue, And Profit Efficiency Of Islamic Versus Conventional Banks: International Evidence Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Islamic Economic Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, January 2008 [Online], 54 Pages Available: https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/isecst/0052.html
  • Brack E. and Jimborean R., (2009), The Cost-Efficiency of French Banks. [Online], 30 Pages Available: http://www.univorleans.fr/gdre09/articles/Jimborean&Brack;_juin2009.pdf.
  • Burger, A. and Moormann, J. (2008), Productivity in banks: myths & truths of the Cost Income Ratio. Banks and Bank Systems, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp. 85-94 [Online], 10 Pages Available:http://businessperspectives.org/journals_free/bbs/2008/BBS_en_2008_4_Burger.p df
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. and Rhodes, E. (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2(6), 429-444.
  • Cecchetti, S. (2012). “Money, Banking and Financial Markets”, Tata Mcgraw Hill Education Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 110008.
  • Fontani, A. and Vitali, L. (2007). Cost efficiency of Italian Commercial Banks: a Stochastic Frontier analysis. [Online], 45 Pages Available: https://art.torvergata.it/bitstream/2108/.../Bank cost efficiency.pdf
  • Heffernan, S. (2004). Modern Banking. West Sussex: Wiley
  • Jagwani, B. (2012). Efficiency Measurement in Indian banking Industry: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Vision, Vol. 16(4), pp. 315-331.
  • Jiang G, Tang N. and Angela Sze E. (2003). The Profitability of the Banking Sector in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Monetary Authority Quarterly Bulletin [Online], 10 Pages Available: http://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/publication-and-research/quarterlybulletin/ qb200309/fa1.pdf
  • Kumar, S. ( 2011). Off-Balance Sheet Activities and Profit Efficiency of Indian Banks: An Empirical Investigation, 13th Annual Conference on Money and Finance in the Indian Economy, [Online], 35 Pages Available:http://www.igidr.ac.in/conf/money/mfc-13/Off-Balance Sheet Activities and Profit Efficiency of IndianBanks.pdf
  • Maudos, J., José Manuel Pastor, J.,M., Pérez, F. and Quesada, J. (1999). "Cost and Profit efficiency in European Banks", [Online], 29 Pages Available: www.ivie.es/downloads/docs/wpasec/wpasec-1999-12.pdf
  • Mishra, A.K., Gadhia, J., Kar, B.P., Patra, B. and Anan, S. (2013). Are Private Sector Banks More Sound and Efficient than Public Sector Banks? Assessments Based on Camel and Data Envelopment Analysis Approaches, Research Journal of Recent Sciences Vol. 2(4), pp 28-35, [Online], 8 Pages Available: http://www.isca.in/rjrs/archive/v2/i4/4.ISCA-RJRS-2012-452.pdf.
  • Rao, K.S. (2013). Productivity, Cost And Profitability Performance of Scheduled Commercial Banks in India - A comparative evaluation, International Abhinav International Monthly Refereed Journal of Research In Management & Technology, Volume II, pp. 130-140.
  • www.rbi.org
  • Reddy A. (2009). Banking Sector Performance During Liberalization in India: A Review. SSRN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL [Online], 18 Pages Available: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/A_Amarender_Reddy/publication/228121679_ Banking_Sector_Performance_During_Liberalization_in_India__A_Review/links/0912f509b18ce6e6ef000000.pdf
  • Sanyal, P. and Shankar, R. (2008). Ownership, Competition and Bank Productivity: An Analysis of Indian Banking in the Post-Reform Period, [Online], 39 Pages Available: people.brandeis.edu/~psanyal/India_Bank_Productivity.pdf
  • Sealy, C. and Lindley, J. (1977). Inputs, Outputs and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions, Journal of Finance, Vol. 32(4), pp. 1251-1266.
  • Shirai S. (2001). Assessment of India’s Banking Sector reforms from the Perspective of The Governance of the Banking System [Online] 24 pages. available.http://www.unescap.org/drpad/publication/fin_2206/part4.pdf
  • Sufian, F., Kamarudin, F. and Mohd Noor, N.H.H. (2012). Determinants of Revenue Efficiency in the Malaysian Islamic Banking Sector, JKAU: Islamic Econ., Vol. 25 No. 2, pp: 195-224 [Online], 30 pages available http://iei.kau.edu.sa/GetFile.aspx?id=151713&Lng=EN&fn=25-2-7-Sufian.pdf
  • Vivas, A.L. (1997). "Profit efficiency for Spanish savings banks", 98 ( 381393),European Journal Of Operational Research,. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from Elsevier Journal http://www.biblioteca.uma.es/bbldoc/articulos/1672060x.pdf
  • Weill, L. (2004). Measuring Cost Efficiency in European Banking: A Comparison of Frontier Techniques. 31 Pages. Available www.eea-esem.com/papers/eeaesem/ esem2002/796/bauer.pdf.

Abstract Views: 383

PDF Views: 2




  • Have Domestic Banks Declined in Operating Efficiency for the Decade Ending 2013-14:CIR and DEA Approaches

Abstract Views: 383  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Rupali S. Gupte
Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
S. U. Gawade
Sinhagad Institute of Management, Pune, India

Abstract


Indian banks are expected to play a key role in the envisaged economic growth of the country and economic leadership of developing economies assumed in the current decade. Banking sector has shown a tremendous growth post economic reforms in 1991. Both Public Sector and Private banks, together comprising of the Domestic banks; have played a very important role in the mobilization of savings, financial services provision and financing of sustainable economic growth. However, there are some consistent problems being faced by domestic banks over the last two decades. As a result the decade ending 2013‒14 has seen these banks facing problems like diminishing profitability and stressed assets. A major reason for this is the suspected diminishing productivity and efficiency of domestic banks over the decade, in spite of business growth and expansion. The study uses both CIR and the non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis approaches to examine the fact of diminishing productivity and efficiency of domestic banks over the decade. It is further established that the main contributors to the overall decline are the Public Sector banks as compared to the Private Sector Banks.

Keywords


Domestic Banks, Productivity, Efficiency, Cost-Income Ratio, DEA, Student's T-Test.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15410/aijm%2F2016%2Fv5i2%2F100697