Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Dynamic Development of Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Multilingual Learners' L1, L2 and L3 Writing


Affiliations
1 National Research Center for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China
2 School of Foreign Studies, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
 

From a dynamic systems theory perspective, this study investigated the development of complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) in five undergraduate multilingual learners' L1 (Chinese), L2 (English) and L3 (French) writing throughout an academic year. Via detailed analysis of the quantitative data, this study aims to longitudinally depict the dynamic and interactive development of CAF in multilingual learners' writing. Results show that the developmental patterns of CAF in multilingual learners' (especially each individual learner's) L1, L2 and L3 writing were characterized by non-linearity, recurrent and elusive increase and backsliding, emergent and constant changes, chaotic iteration, etc. Results also demonstrate that CAF components were integratively and interactively correlated with each other in multilingual learners' writing over time. The findings hold some implications for theories and methodologies of multilingual acquisition/development studies.

Keywords

Dynamic Systems Theory, Complexity, Accuracy, Fluency, Multilingual Development.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aronin, L., & Hufeisen, B. (2009). The exploration of multilingualism: Development of research on L3, multilingualism and multiple language acquisition. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45, 5-35.
  • Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
  • Cenoz, J. (2013a). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition. Language Teaching, 46, 71-86.
  • Cenoz, J. (2013b). Third language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1214.
  • Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2011). Focus on multilingualism: a study of trilingual writing. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 356-369.
  • Cenoz, J., & Jessner, U. (Eds.), (2000). English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. California: University of California Press.
  • Chu, C. C. (1998). Discourse grammar of Mandarin Chinese. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
  • De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • de Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 166-178.
  • de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: methods and techniques (pp. 5-23). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7-21.
  • Fu, Z. (1985). Xiandai hanyu cihui [Modern Chinese words]. Beijing: Beijing University Press.
  • Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Changing the psycholinguistic perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 461-473.
  • Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (Eds.), (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Hufeisen, B. (2004). A brief introduction to the linguistic foundations. In B. Hufeisen, & G. Neuner (Eds.), The plurilingualism project: Tertiary language learning-German after English (pp. 7-11). Graz, Austria: Council of Europe.
  • Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels (NCTE research report No. 3). Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
  • Jessner, U. (2008). A DST model of multilingualism and the role of metalinguistic awareness. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 270-283.
  • Jiang, W. (2013). Measurements of development in L2 written production: The case of L2 Chinese. Applied Linguistics, 34, 1-24.
  • Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (2013). L1/L2/L3 writing development: Longitudinal case study of a Japanese multicompetent writer. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 4-33.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141-165.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590-619.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48-72). London & New York: Routledge.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics? Language Teaching, 45, 202-214.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2013). Chaos/Complexity theory for second language acquisition/development. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0125.
  • Li, H. (2006). Youer xinlixue [Child psychology]. Beijing: People's Education Press.
  • Norris, J. M., & L. Ortega. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555-578.
  • Pan, W. (2002). Zi benwei yu hanyu yanjiu [Character as a basic unit and Chinese studies]. Nanjing: East China Normal University Press.
  • Sasaki, M. (2004). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54, 525-582.
  • Sasaki, M. (2007). Effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL writers: A multiple-data analysis. Modern Language Journal, 91, 602-620.
  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-31.
  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
  • Singleton, D. (2005). The Critical Period Hypothesis: A coat of many colors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 269-285.
  • Singleton, D., & Ryan, L. (2004). Language acquisition: The age factor (2nd ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31, 532-553.
  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 258-312). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. New York: Harvester.
  • van Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 179-199.
  • Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.), (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in L2 development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 214-231.
  • Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity (Tech. Rep. No 17). Manoa: University of Hawai'i Press.
  • Zhang, H. (2013). ICTCLAS2013 (Computer Software). http://ictclas.nlpir.org/downloads (accessed 20/4/2013).
  • Zhu, D. (1982). Yufa jiangyi [A textbook on grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Abstract Views: 293

PDF Views: 63




  • Dynamic Development of Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Multilingual Learners' L1, L2 and L3 Writing

Abstract Views: 293  |  PDF Views: 63

Authors

Wenxing Yang
National Research Center for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China
Ying Sun
School of Foreign Studies, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China

Abstract


From a dynamic systems theory perspective, this study investigated the development of complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) in five undergraduate multilingual learners' L1 (Chinese), L2 (English) and L3 (French) writing throughout an academic year. Via detailed analysis of the quantitative data, this study aims to longitudinally depict the dynamic and interactive development of CAF in multilingual learners' writing. Results show that the developmental patterns of CAF in multilingual learners' (especially each individual learner's) L1, L2 and L3 writing were characterized by non-linearity, recurrent and elusive increase and backsliding, emergent and constant changes, chaotic iteration, etc. Results also demonstrate that CAF components were integratively and interactively correlated with each other in multilingual learners' writing over time. The findings hold some implications for theories and methodologies of multilingual acquisition/development studies.

Keywords


Dynamic Systems Theory, Complexity, Accuracy, Fluency, Multilingual Development.

References