Research Journal of Animal Husbandry & Dairy Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Formaldehyde Treated Concentrate, Urea and Soybean Meal on Yield and Quality of Cow Milk


Affiliations
1 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Present investigation entitled “effect of formaldehyde treated concentrate, urea and soybean meal on yield and quality of cow milk” was undertaken at Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola. Feeding of 1.5 per cent formaldehyde treated 70:30 sugras : SBM concentrate mixture with 2 per cent added urea diet to lactating cows (T3) was evaluated in relation to sugras untreated ration (T1). It is concluded that lactating cows reared on HCHO treated 70:30 sugras:SBM concentrates with 2 per cent added urea ration produced 15 and 19 per cent more milk and 4 per cent FCM in comparison to control diet comprising feeding of sugras milk ration. Feeding of HCHO treated concentrate with 3 per cent added urea (T5) and untreated concentrates with 3 per cent added urea (T4) rations did not influence significantly on fat content of milk, being 4.23 and 4.24 per cent, respectively. There was increase in protein content of milk by 9.30 per cent on formaldehyde treatment (T3) as compared to T1 control group. The average SNF content in milk in order of significance was 8.87, 8.74 and 8.60 per cent under T3, T5 and T1 groups, respectively. While the SNF content of milk noticed on feeding untreated 70:30 sugras:SBM with 2 per cent (T2) and 3 per cent (T4) added urea diets was significantly lower than that of T3 and T5 respective treated groups On the other hand, TS content of 12.74, 12.78 and 12.96 per cent were noticed under T1, T4 and T5 treatments, respectively.

Keywords

Formaldehyde, Sugras, Urea, Soybean Meal, Milk Yield, Milk Quality, 4 Per Cent FCM, Fat, Protein, Solid not Fat, Total Solids.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amble, V. N. (1975). Statistical method in animal science. Ist Ed., Published by Indian Society of Agriculture Statistics. New Delhi. pp. 199-219.

  • Anonymous (2012). Area and production estimates of soybean in India Kharif (Monsoon) 2012 (Based on crop survey conducted by SOPA).

  • Banerjee, G.C. (1998 ). A textbook of animal husbandry, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co-Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. pp. 661-677.

  • Banerjee, G.C. (2008). A text book of animal husbandry. Edn. 8th, Oxford and IBH Publishing. Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India, pp. 340-345.

  • Bugalia, H.L., Chaudhary, J. L. and Gupta Lokesh (2008a). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated treated til cake on milk yield and composition of lactating crossbred cows. IJDS, 61 (2): 116-121.

  • Bugalia, H.L., Chaudhary, J. L. and Gupta Lokesh (2008b). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) cake on reproductive efficiency and physiological responses of crossbred cows. Anim. Nutr. & Feed Technol., 8 : 219-226.

  • Chakravarty, A.K. (2010). Efficient breeding strategies for economic sustenance of dairy farms. Compendium of water school organized on 1030 Nov. 2010, NDRI, Karnal (HARYANA) INDIA.

  • Chatterjee, A. and Walli, T.K. (2002). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated mustard cake as bypass protein on milk yield and milk composition on Murrah buffaloes. IJDS, 56: 299 - 305.

  • Chatterjee, A. and Walli, T.K. (2003). Economics of feeding treated GN cake and its partial replacement with urea on growth and feed utilization in crossbred kids. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 86 (4) : 241-244.

  • Chaturvedi, O.H. and Walli, T.K. (2000). Effect of feeding graded levels of bypass protein on nutrient utilization, nutrient partitioning and on performance of lactating crossbred cows. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 53 (1): 1-10.

  • Croociker, B. A., Clark, J.H. and Shanks, R.D. (1983). Effects of formaldehyde treated soybean meal on milk yield, milk composition and nutrient digestibility in the dairy cow. J.Dairy Sci., 66 (3): 492–504.

  • De, Sukumar (1990).Outline of dairy technology,Ed. Published byOxfordUniversityPress Waton Street,Oxford: 26 New Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta and Madras, India.

  • Doskey, Kamal Noman, Dhiaa, Omar, Al-Mallah and Sulaiman, Nihet hajji (2011). Effect of feeding urea treated wheat straw and formaldehyde treated barley grains on milk composition and some blood metabolites of Meriz does. Roavs., 1(1): 700-703.

  • FAO (2007). Bulletin of statistics, food and Agricultural organization of the United nations, Rome, 5 : 31.

  • Garg, M. R., Sherasia, P. L., Bhandari, B. M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2003a). Effect of feeding rumen protected protein on milk production in lactating buffaloes. Anim. Nutr. & Feed Technol., 3 : 151-157.

  • Garg, M. R., Sherasia, P. L., Bhandari, B. M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2003b). Effect of feeding formaldehyder treated guar meal on milk production in crossbred cows. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 20 (3) : 334-338.

  • Garg, M.R., Sherasia, P. L., Bhandari, B. M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2003c). Effect of feeding rumen protected protein on milk production in lactating cows. IJDS, 56(4): 218-221.

  • Garg, M. R., Sherasia, P. L., Bhandari, B. M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2004). Effect of feeding protected protein on milk production and composition of lactating cows. Indian Vet. J., 81: 48-50.

  • Gulati, S.K., Scott, T.W., Garg, M.R. and Singh, D.K. (2002). An overview of rumen protected or bypass proteins and their potential to increase milk production in India. Indian Dairyman, 54 (3) : 31-35.

  • Guru, Mieso, Prasad, Shiv and Kamboj, M.L. (2006). Effect of energy and bypass protein supplementation on production performance lactating crossbred goats. IJDS, 59 (2) : 90-94.

  • ISI (1958). 1224, Indian Standard Institute, Manek Bhavan, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • ISI (1961). Part-II, 1479. Indian Standard Institute, Manek Bhavan, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • ISI (1965). 1183, Indian Standard Institute, Manek Bhavan, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • ISI (1975). Part-I, 7874 Indian Standard Institute, Manek Bhaven, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • ISI (1977). Part-I 1224, Indian standard Institute, Manek Bhavan, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Leonardi, C., Stockland, W. and Armentana, L.E. (2004). Production response of dairy cows fed soybean meal heat treated with different methodologies. Professional Animal Scientist, 20 (1) :279.

  • Morgan, D.J. (1985). The effect of formatin tracated soybean meal upon the performance of lactating cows. Anim. Prod., 41 (1) : 33-42.

  • Prasad, Jagdish and Neeraj (2008). Principles and practices of animal nutrition IInd Ed., Kalyani Publishers, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Rekhate, D. H., Madavi, V. B., Dhok, A. P. and Koskewar, V. V. (2005). Utilization of gram (Cicer orientinm) straw based pelleted complete ration in goats. Indian J. Small Ruminants,11(1) : 80-83.

  • Sahoo, B. and Walli, T.K. (2005). Effect of feeding bypass protein as formaldehyde treated mustard cake along with energy supplement on blood metabolites and milk production in lactating goats. IJDS, 58 (3) : 184-189.

  • Sampath, K.T., Chandrasekharaiah, M. and Thulasi, A. (2004). Bypass protein and its relevance in feeding of Indian livestock. Proccedings of V. ANA. Conference.pp. 26-32.

  • Sastry, N.S.R. and Thomas, C.K. (1976). Farm animal management, Published by Vikas Publication House Pvt. Ltd., NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Sengal, S.S., Sikka, Mrs P., Dahiya, S.S., Gupta, R. and Midgal, V.D. (1990). Milk production in early lactation in buffaloes maintained on urea treated and less degradable protein supplemented wheat straw. Indian J. Dairy Sci.,43(4):503-508.

  • Yadav, B.P.S. and Yadav, I.S. (1986). Ammoniated straw as components of growth ration for crossbred calves. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 3 (1) : 1-7.

  • Yadav, B.P.S. and Yadav, I.S. (1989). Comparative study of ammoniated wheat and paddy straws on nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation in cattle. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 6(3) : 215 - 222.

  • Yadav, C.M. and Chaudhary, J.L. (2004). Effect of feeding protected protein on nutrient utilization, milk yield and milk composition of lactating crossbred cows. IJDS, 57(6): 394-399.

  • Yadav, C.M. and Chaudhary, J.L. (2010). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated groundnut cake on nutrients digestibility and efficiency in lactating crossbred cows. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 27 (4) : 379-384.


Abstract Views: 182

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Formaldehyde Treated Concentrate, Urea and Soybean Meal on Yield and Quality of Cow Milk

Abstract Views: 182  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

N. S. Chore
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
S. D. Chavan
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
R. R. Shelke
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India
P. A. Kahate
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), India

Abstract


Present investigation entitled “effect of formaldehyde treated concentrate, urea and soybean meal on yield and quality of cow milk” was undertaken at Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola. Feeding of 1.5 per cent formaldehyde treated 70:30 sugras : SBM concentrate mixture with 2 per cent added urea diet to lactating cows (T3) was evaluated in relation to sugras untreated ration (T1). It is concluded that lactating cows reared on HCHO treated 70:30 sugras:SBM concentrates with 2 per cent added urea ration produced 15 and 19 per cent more milk and 4 per cent FCM in comparison to control diet comprising feeding of sugras milk ration. Feeding of HCHO treated concentrate with 3 per cent added urea (T5) and untreated concentrates with 3 per cent added urea (T4) rations did not influence significantly on fat content of milk, being 4.23 and 4.24 per cent, respectively. There was increase in protein content of milk by 9.30 per cent on formaldehyde treatment (T3) as compared to T1 control group. The average SNF content in milk in order of significance was 8.87, 8.74 and 8.60 per cent under T3, T5 and T1 groups, respectively. While the SNF content of milk noticed on feeding untreated 70:30 sugras:SBM with 2 per cent (T2) and 3 per cent (T4) added urea diets was significantly lower than that of T3 and T5 respective treated groups On the other hand, TS content of 12.74, 12.78 and 12.96 per cent were noticed under T1, T4 and T5 treatments, respectively.

Keywords


Formaldehyde, Sugras, Urea, Soybean Meal, Milk Yield, Milk Quality, 4 Per Cent FCM, Fat, Protein, Solid not Fat, Total Solids.

References