Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Artyszak, A.
- The Yield and Technological Quality of Sugar Beet Roots Cultivated in Mulches
Abstract Views :84 |
PDF Views:45
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02 787 Warsaw, PL
2 Department of Experimental Design and Bioinformatics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, PL
3 Department of Agronomy, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, PL
1 Department of Agronomy, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02 787 Warsaw, PL
2 Department of Experimental Design and Bioinformatics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, PL
3 Department of Agronomy, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, PL
Source
Plant, Soil and Environment, Vol 60, No 10 (2014), Pagination: 464–469Abstract
In 2005-2008, in several locations of southern Poland, the yield and technological root quality of two sugar beet cultivars (Esperanza and Henrike) cultivated in mustard mulch, straw mulch and in conventional tillage (with pre-winter plough) were investigated. Mustard mulch let to achieve the highest plant density during harvest. Replacing conventional ploughing with mustard mulch caused 9.4% root yield increase and with straw mulch 11.2%. Cultivation system had no effect on the content of sucrose and melassigenic components in the roots, except for potassium. Technological sugar yields obtained from mustard mulch were by 8.0% and in straw mulch by 11.3% higher than in the conventional tillage. Cv. Esperanza allowed getting the higher root yield, average fresh mass of single root and technological sugar yield, than cv. Henrike. In addition, lower content of alpha-amino-nitrogen was obtained from roots of the cv. Esperenza. In contrast, higher sucrose content and lower sodium content were found in the roots of cv. Henrike. The lowest variability in the sugar beet root yield features and technological quality was achieved from straw mulch.Keywords
Conventional Tillage, Mustard Mulch, Beta vulgaris L., Straw Mulch, Cultivar.Full Text
References
- Artyszak A. (2012): Agronomic and habitant conditions for sugar beet yielding and health. Rozprawy Naukowe i Monografie 398. Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa. (In Polish)
- Becker C. (1997): Zuckerrubenbau ohne Pflug. Zuckerrube, 4: 198-201.
- Becker C., Marlander B. (1998): Ertrag und Qualitat von Zucker-ruben in dauerhaft pfluglosen Bodenbearbeitungssystemen - Ergebnisse einer Versuchsserie auf GroBflachen. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften, 2: 7-15.
- Buchholz K., Marlander B., Puke H., Glattkowski H., Thielecke K. (1995): Neubewertung des technischen Wertes von Zuckerruben. Zuckerindustrie, 120: 113-121.
- Kessel R., Dahms K.P. (1991): Mulchsaatverfahren in der Zuckerrubenbestellung. Feldwirtschaft, 32: 415-417.
- Koch H.J., Dieckmann J., Buchse A., Marlander B. (2009): Yield decrease in sugar beet caused by reduced tillage and direct drilling. European Journal of Agronomy, 30: 101-109.
- Kordas L. (2000): Investigations on optimization of cultivation sugar beet on rye soil complex. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej we Wroclawiu 386, Rozprawa 179. Ed. AR Wroclaw. (In Polish)
- Kordas L., Zimny L. (1997): Effect of stubble crops on sugar beet yield in direct sowing technology. Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roslin, 202: 207-211. (In Polish)
- Kuc P., Zimny L. (2005): Yielding and technological quality of sugar beet growing in different cultivation systems. Annales UMCS, Section E, 60: 133-143. (In Polish)
- Petersen J., Rover A. (2005): Comparison of sugar beet cropping systems with dead and living mulch using a glyphosate-resistant hybrid. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 191: 55-63.
- Roisin C., Frankinet M. (1994): Developing of a new cropping system for sugar beet production related to protection of the environment. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference ISTRO, Aalborg, July 24-29, 1994, 751-756.
- Van den Putte A., Govers G., Diels J., Gillijns K., Demuzere M. (2010): Assessing the effect of soil tillage on crop growth: A meta-regression analysis on European crop yields under conservation agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy, 33: 231-241
- The Effect of Foliar Fertilization With Marine Calcite in Sugar Beet
Abstract Views :67 |
PDF Views:41
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02 787 Warsaw, Warsaw, PL
2 Department of Experimental Design and Bioinformatics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, PL
3 Department of Agronomy, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw
1 Department of Agronomy, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02 787 Warsaw, Warsaw, PL
2 Department of Experimental Design and Bioinformatics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, PL
3 Department of Agronomy, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw
Source
Plant, Soil and Environment, Vol 60, No 9 (2014), Pagination: 413-417Abstract
The effect of marine calcite (containing calcium and silicon mainly) foliar fertilization on the sugar beet root yield and technological quality relative to the control (treatment 0) was investigated. Study was conducted in 2011-2012 in the southeastern region of Poland, in Sahryn (50°41'N, 23°46'E). The cultivar of sugar beet was Danuska KWS. Two treatments of foliar fertilization: (1) treatment (in the stage of 4-6 sugar leaves - 262.0 g Ca/ha, 79.9 g Si/ha, and three weeks later - 524.0 g Ca/ha, 159.8 g Si/ha); and (2) treatment (in the stage of 4-6 sugar leaves - 524.0 g Ca/ha, 159.8 g Si/ha, three weeks later - 524.0 g Ca/ha, 159.8 g Si/ha). Calcium and silicon foliar fertilization resulted in increases of: (1) the root yield (average for both treatments about 13.1%; (2) the leaf yield (about 21.0%); (3) the biological sugar yield (about 15.5%), and (4) technological yield of sugar (about 17.7%) compared with the control treatment. At the same time a positive effect on the roots technological quality was found. It was a significant reduction of alpha-amino-nitrogen content and tended to reduce the content of potassium and sodium.Keywords
Calcium, Root Yield, Silicon, Technological Quality of Roots, Beta vulgaris.Full Text
References
- Buchholz K., Marlander B., Puke H., Glattkowski H., Thielecke K. (1995): Neubewertung des technischen Wertes von Zuckerruben. Zuckerindustrie, 120: 113-121.
- Cai K., Gao D., Chen J., Luo S. (2009): Probing the mechanisms of silicon-mediated pathogen resistance. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 4: 1-3.
- Cakmakci R., Oral E., Kantar F. (1998): Root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in relation to plant population. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 180: 45-52.
- Campbell L.G. (2002): Sugar beet quality improvement. In: Basra A.S., Randhawa L.S. (eds.): Quality Improvement in Field Crops. The Haworth Press Inc., Binghamptom, 395-413.
- Casey W.H., Kinrade S.D., Knight C.T.G., Rains D.W., Epstein E. (2003): Aqueous silicate complexes in wheat, Triticum aestivum L. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27: 51-54.
- Fauteux F., Remus-Borel W., Menzies J.G., Belanger R.R. (2005): Silicon and plant disease resistance against pathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 249: 1-6.
- Fawe A., Abou-Zaid M., Menzies J.G., Belanger R.R. (1998): Silicon-mediated accumulation of flavonoid phytoalexins in cucumber. Phytopathology, 88: 396-401.
- Gunes A., Inal A., Bagci E.G., Pilbeam D.J. (2007): Silicon-mediated changes of some physiological and enzymatic parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress in spinach and tomato grown in sodic-B toxic soil. Plant and Soil, 290: 103-114.
- Guntzer F., Keller C., Meunier J.-D. (2012): Benefits of plant silicon for crops: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32: 201-213.
- Henriet C., Draye X., Oppitz I., Swennen R., Delvaux B. (2006): Effects, distribution and uptake of silicon in banana (Musa spp.) under controlled conditions. Plant and Soil, 287: 359-374.
- Hou L.Q., Szwonek E., Xing S.J. (2006): Advances in silicon research of horticultural crops. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, 64: 5-17.
- Liang Y., Hua H., Zhu Y.G., Zhang J., Cheng C., Romheld V. (2006): Importance of plant species and external silicon concentration to active silicon uptake and transport. New Phytologist, 172: 63-72.
- Ma J.F., Mitani N., Nagao S., Konishi S., Tamai K., Iwashita T., Yano M. (2004): Characterization of the silicon uptake system and molecular mapping of the silicon transporter gene in rice. Plant Physiology, 136: 3284-3289.
- Ma J.F., Yamaji N. (2006): Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends in Plant Science, 11: 392-397.
- Matichenkov V.V., Calvert D.V. (2002): Silicon as a beneficial element for sugarcane. American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Journal, 22: 21-30.
- Mitani N., Ma J.F. (2005): Uptake system of silicon in different plant species. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56: 1255-1261.
- Raven J.A. (2003): Cycling silicon - The role of accumulation in plants. New Phytologist, 158: 419-421.
- Sacala E. (2009): Role of silicon in plant resistance to water stress. Journal of Elementology, 14: 619-630.
- Samuels A.L., Glass A.D.M., Ehret D.L., Menzies J.G. (1993): The effects of silicon supplementation on cucumber fruit: Changes in surface characteristics. Annals of Botany, 72: 433-440.
- Ugrinovic M., Oljaca S., Brdar-Jokanovic M., Zdravkovic J., Girek Z., Zdravkovic M. (2011): The effect of liquid and soluble fertilizers on lettuce yield. Contemporary Agriculture - The Serbian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 60: 110-115.
- Yamaji N., Mitatni N., Ma J.F. (2008): A transporter regulating silicon distribution in rice shoots. The Plant Cell, 20: 1381-1389.