PES Business Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Ownership Pattern on the Profitability of the Nationalized Public Sector Banks in India


Affiliations
1 NICMAR, Hyderabad, India
 

If an attempt is made to study the economic scenario of last 8 years or so, one can see that it has been very volatile for not only the Indian economy but also for the entire world economy. Most of the economies are in the process of recovery. Many investors have lost their money as the stock prices reached minimal levels in most of financial markets over the world during this period. The performance of banking sector always had a very significant impact on the performance of the national economies. In India, public sector bank dominates the entire banking sector as they account for over 80% of banking business in India. The performance of banks depends on so many factors. One of the important factors can be pattern of ownerships. If we look at the pattern of ownerships of public sector banks, we can find they are owned by entities like Government, Financial institutions, corporate entities and individual shareholders. The present article attempts to study how the pattern of ownerships has an impact on the performance of the banks in terms of two key variable, namely, RoA and net profit for the last two financial years, 2013-14 and 2014-15.

Keywords

Ownership and Control, Nationalized Bank, Financial Institute.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Berle, A.A., Jr and Means, Gardiner C. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York, MacMillan

  • Biresh K Sahoo and Anandadeep Mandal (2011). “Examining the Performance of Banks in India: Post Transition Period” IUP Journal of Bank Management.Vol. X, No. 2, pp. 7-31

  • Bisky, Tom (1982).Follow Fundamentals and Flourish, Say Top-Earning Banks. ABA Banking Journal, Vol. 74 Issue 10, p91-99.

  • Borcherding T E, Pommerehne W W and Schneider F (1982). Comparing the efficiency of Private and Public Production: The evidence from Five Countries, Journal of Economics (supplement 2), pp 127-156

  • Calomiris, Charles W.; Mason, Joseph R. (2003). Fundamentals, Panics, and Bank Distress during the Depression, American Economic Review, Vol. 93 Issue 5, p1615-1647.

  • Caves D W and Christensen L R (1980), The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Competitive Environment: The Case of Canadian Railroads Journal of Political Economy, Vol 88, No. 5, pp - 958-976.

  • Chambers, Alex (2007). Is The Banking Boom Sustainable? Euromoney, Vol. 38 Issue 454, p84-87. 4p. 2

  • Cheema C S and Aggarwal Monika (2002), "Productivity in Commercial Banks: A DEA Approach", The Business Review, Vol. 8, Nos. 1 & 2, pp. 15-17

  • Fama, Eugene F. (1980), 'Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm', 88 Journal of Political Economy, 288 ff

  • Hammond, Clare (2012). Morgan Stanley Increases Exposure to India Credit as Fundamentals Deteriorate, Asiamoney, p164-164. 1p.

  • Jadhav, R. A (2011). An Overview of the Banking Sector, Chapter 1, Pp.20-35. Retrieved From Http://Shodhganga.Inflibnet. Ac.In/Bitstream/10603/2031/10/10_Chapter%201.Pdf

  • P Janaki Ramudu, S Durga Rao (2006). “A fundamental analysis of Indian banking industry”, IPU Journal of Bank Management V (4): pp.68-79

  • Jensen, Michael C. and Meckling, William H. (1976), 'Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure', 3 Journal of Financial Economics, 305-360.

  • Mark P Bauman (1996), "A Review of Fundamental Analysis Research in Accounting", Journal of Accounting Literature, volume 15, pp 1 -33.

  • Millward, R. and Parker, D. 1983. Public and private enterprise, comparative behaviour and relative efficiency, In: R. Millward, D. Parker, L. Rosenthal, M.T. Sumner, and N. Topham eds. Public Sector Economics, London and New York: Longman, 199-274.

  • Mishra, R. K.; Sarma, K. Jayaditya; Avadhanam, Pawan Kumar (2011). Influence of Corporate Fundamentals on Equity Returns of Public Sector Banks and Public SectorFinancial Institutions in India, Journal of Institute of Public Enterprise,Vol. 34 Issue 1/2, p59-72. 14p. 3

  • Ramaswamy K (2201), Organizational Ownership, Competitive Intensity and Firm Performance: Am Empirical study of the Indian manufacturing sector, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 22, No. 10, pp 989 – 998.

  • RBI Publications (2012). Operations and Performance of Commercial Banks, Chapter IV, pp. 54-92, Retrieved from http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/04CP_RTP031112_F .pdf

  • Sathye, Milind (2001), "Efficiency of Banks in a Developing Economy: The Case of India", School of Accounting, Banking and Finance, University of Canberra. Vol 148 pp 662-671

  • Shleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert W. (1986), 'Large Shareholders and Corporate Control', 94 Journal of Political Economy, 461-488

  • Vining, A.R. and Boardman, A.E. 1992. Ownership versus competition: efficiency in public enterprise. Public Choice, 73, No. 2, 205-239.


Abstract Views: 700

PDF Views: 117




  • Impact of Ownership Pattern on the Profitability of the Nationalized Public Sector Banks in India

Abstract Views: 700  |  PDF Views: 117

Authors

P. Hanumantha Rao
NICMAR, Hyderabad, India

Abstract


If an attempt is made to study the economic scenario of last 8 years or so, one can see that it has been very volatile for not only the Indian economy but also for the entire world economy. Most of the economies are in the process of recovery. Many investors have lost their money as the stock prices reached minimal levels in most of financial markets over the world during this period. The performance of banking sector always had a very significant impact on the performance of the national economies. In India, public sector bank dominates the entire banking sector as they account for over 80% of banking business in India. The performance of banks depends on so many factors. One of the important factors can be pattern of ownerships. If we look at the pattern of ownerships of public sector banks, we can find they are owned by entities like Government, Financial institutions, corporate entities and individual shareholders. The present article attempts to study how the pattern of ownerships has an impact on the performance of the banks in terms of two key variable, namely, RoA and net profit for the last two financial years, 2013-14 and 2014-15.

Keywords


Ownership and Control, Nationalized Bank, Financial Institute.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21842/pes%2F2016%2Fv11%2Fi2%2F140729