Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Examinations:The Central Governance Concern in Indian Universities


Affiliations
1 National College of Pharmacy, Kozhikode – 673602, Kerala, India
 

Examinations, chiefly for historic reasons, have been a crushing preoccupation for students, schools, universities, and the Indian society at large, particularly for many monolithic faculty-universities awarding coveted professional degrees in healthcare and engineering. The stress on bureaucratic expediency and confidentiality, fear of public disapproval, dearth of manpower, media sensationalism, litigations and the genuine threat of corruption, together compel universities to allocate bulk of their resources (human as well as capital) towards adopting a brutally centralized governance model for achieving an ostensibly "transparent" evaluation system. Although the university administration spends most of its time in planning, scheduling, organizing and conducting examinations, nearly 70% of student-evaluation, ironically, occurs in a single sitting lasting three hours and the answer paper is typically valued in about 8 minutes. Consequently, such evaluation systems ignore the functions and purpose of examinations, its content and construct validity, reliability, objectivity, its timing and timeliness, thereby perpetuating a ritualized, self-defeating, stagnating curriculum. While decentralisation of evaluation through autonomy is most desirable, training teachers to prepare question papers amenable to objective evaluation, with question papers validated for content/ difficulty levels, might help in the near term.

Keywords

Governance Models, Higher Education, Universities.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Basu A. Indian higher education: Colonialism and beyond. From Dependence to Autonomy. Springer. 1989; p. 167-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2563-2_7
  • India has exam system, not education system [Internet]. Available from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-has-exam-system-not-education-system/articleshow/7977172.cms. Access date: 2017 Jan 31.
  • Unnikrishnan MK. Pressing Need for Examination Reforms in the Coming Millenium: The Sine Qua Non for Good Educational Practices. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2000; 34(1):23-6.
  • Rosenthal R, Jacobson L. Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils’ Intellectual Development, by Robert Rosenthal, Lenore Jacobson. Rinehart and Winston. 1968.
  • CBSE question paper leaks [Internet]. The New Indian Express. 2018. Available from: http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2018/mar/30/cbse-question-paper-leaks-here-are-the-major-developments-so-far-1794712.html. Access date: 2018 Apr 17.
  • Rowntree D. Assessing students: How shall we know them? Taylor & Francis. 1977.
  • Delhi police busts fake degree racket [Internet]. First Post. Available from: https://www.firstpost.com/india/delhi-police-busts-fake-degree-racket-involving-sale-of-50000-forged-certificates-three-persons-arrested-4325863.html. Access date: 2018 Apr 17.
  • Hemali Chhapia. JEE questions identical to 2016 test in coaching class? [Internet]. The Times of India. 2018. Available from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/jee-questions-identical-to-16-test-in-coaching-class/articleshow/63704055.cms. Access date: 2018 Apr 17.
  • Gortney JS, Bray BS, Salinitri FD. Implementation and use of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment at US schools of pharmacy. The American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2015; 79(9):137. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe799137 PMid:26839427 PMCid:PMC4727371
  • Marton F, Saaljo R. On qualitative differences in learning - ii Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1976; 46(2):115-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
  • Yeravdekar VR, Tiwari G. Internationalization of Higher Education in India: How primed is the country to take on education hubs? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 157:165-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.020
  • Yashpal. Yashpal Committee Report [Internet]. 2009. Available from: https://www.aicte-india.org/reports/overview/Yashpal-Committee-Report. Access date: 2018 Apr 17.
  • Official website of Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka [Internet]. Available from: http://www.rguhs.ac.in/about_rguhs.html. Access date: 2018 Jan 31.
  • Unnikrishnan MK AKS. Question paper: A great Hazard in Student Evaluation. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 1999; 33(3):135-7.
  • Kerala Government Gazette [Internet]. No.2891/ ACI/GENA2/KUHS/2017 Kerala/India. 2017 p. 22. Available from: http://14.139.185.154/images/kerala/kuhs/syllabus/regulations_2017/KUHS_Regulations_2017_Kerala_Gazette_No_1447.pdf
  • Unnikrishnan MK. Syllabus Manufacturing: The Grand Plans vis a vis Staggering Blunders. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2001; 35(1):4-5.
  • Sudhir PK, Kuttichira P, Harilal K, Mohandas K. A SWOT analysis of the new pattern of examinations of the Kerala University of Health Sciences. 2014.
  • Martin S. Two models of educational assessment: a response from initial teacher education: if the cap fits…. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1997; 22(3):337-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293970220307
  • V.A. S. Banaras Hindu University 1905-1935. Banaras Hindu University. p. 430-50.
  • Unnikrishnan MK. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences and the Pharmacy Curriculum : Fruits of Brutal Centralisation. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2003; 37(3):118-20.
  • Radhakrishnan S. The University Education Commission [Internet]. 1959. Available from: http://www.educationforallinindia.com/1949 Report of the University Education Commission.pdf.
  • Kothari DS. Indian Education Commission [Internet]. 1966. Available from: http://www.teindia.nic.in/files/reports/ccr/KC/KC_V1.pdf.
  • Biman Basu. Yash Pal, A Life in Science. First. Vigyan Prasar, Department of Science and Technology. 2006; p. 103.
  • Dave RH, Hill WH. Educational and Social Dynamics of the Examination System in India. Comparative Education Review. 1974; 18(1):24-38. https://doi.org/10.1086/445753.
  • Venkatachaliah MN. The National Commission to review the working of the Constitution (NCRWC). 2002.
  • Aaron S. Rot in education [Internet]. Hindustan Times. 2016. Available from: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/rot-in-education-students-suffer-as-corruption-politics-plague-the-system/story-cNnB8ZoPgXpbVnrZjy0nIM.html. Access date: 2016 Apr 17.
  • Indian Kanoon [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=rajiv+gandhi+university+of+health+sciences. Access date: 2018 Apr 14.

Abstract Views: 262

PDF Views: 69




  • Examinations:The Central Governance Concern in Indian Universities

Abstract Views: 262  |  PDF Views: 69

Authors

Akash Marathakam
National College of Pharmacy, Kozhikode – 673602, Kerala, India
Vimal Mathew
National College of Pharmacy, Kozhikode – 673602, Kerala, India
Zuhara Mariyam
National College of Pharmacy, Kozhikode – 673602, Kerala, India
M. K. Unnikrishnan
National College of Pharmacy, Kozhikode – 673602, Kerala, India

Abstract


Examinations, chiefly for historic reasons, have been a crushing preoccupation for students, schools, universities, and the Indian society at large, particularly for many monolithic faculty-universities awarding coveted professional degrees in healthcare and engineering. The stress on bureaucratic expediency and confidentiality, fear of public disapproval, dearth of manpower, media sensationalism, litigations and the genuine threat of corruption, together compel universities to allocate bulk of their resources (human as well as capital) towards adopting a brutally centralized governance model for achieving an ostensibly "transparent" evaluation system. Although the university administration spends most of its time in planning, scheduling, organizing and conducting examinations, nearly 70% of student-evaluation, ironically, occurs in a single sitting lasting three hours and the answer paper is typically valued in about 8 minutes. Consequently, such evaluation systems ignore the functions and purpose of examinations, its content and construct validity, reliability, objectivity, its timing and timeliness, thereby perpetuating a ritualized, self-defeating, stagnating curriculum. While decentralisation of evaluation through autonomy is most desirable, training teachers to prepare question papers amenable to objective evaluation, with question papers validated for content/ difficulty levels, might help in the near term.

Keywords


Governance Models, Higher Education, Universities.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/nmr%2F2017%2F21777