Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Co-Composting of Kitchen Waste, Faeces and Sewage Sludge as Sustainable Strategy for Island Waste Management: Process Dynamics


Affiliations
1 Department of Military Facilities, Army Logistics University of PLA, Chongqing, 401331, China
2 Bureau of Navy Engineering Design and Research, Beijing, 100070, China
3 Air Force Unit 93413, Yongji, 044500, China
 

Solid waste management is an inevitable challenge for Chinese government during the island construction practice in the South China Sea. Composting, if it is properly put into application, can constitute an environment friendly and sustainable method for solid waste management on these newly-built artificial coral reefs, due to its great potential to improve coral sand soil with low cost. As the key components of island solid wastes, kitchen waste, faeces and sewage sludge were combined in ratio of 1:1:1, which conformed to the actual production and constituted a mixed waste system. Thus, using a self-made intelligent reactor, this paper presented the performance and potential of mixed treatment of kitchen waste, faeces and sewage sludge through co-composting with the coamendment of sawdust and cornstalk. A series of process parameters were monitored, the laws about degradation and resynthesis of organic matter, transformation and loss of nitrogen were revealed in this paper. The results indicated that applying the aerobic composting technology to the solid waste treatment in the mixed system of kitchen waste, faeces and sewage sludge with coamendment of sawdust and cornstalk was feasible, and the optimal mixed ratio of total waste to coamendment was 4:1 on analysis of technique and economics.

Keywords

Wastes In The Islands, Kitchen Waste, Faeces, Co-Composting, Process Dynamics.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Awasthi, M.K., Pandey, A.K., Bundela, P.S. and Khan, J. 2015. Cocomposting of organic fraction of municipal solid waste mixed with different bulking waste: Characterization of physicochemical parameters and microbial enzymatic dynamic. Bioresource Technology, 182: 200-207.
  • Bao, S.D. 2000. Soil Chemical Analysis. China Agriculture Press, pp. 235.
  • Bustamante, M.A., Paredes, C., Marhuenda-Egea, F.C., Pérez-Espinosa, A., Bernal, M.P. and Moral, R. 2008. Co-composting of distillery wastes with animal manures: Carbon and nitrogen transformations in the evaluation of compost stability. Chemosphere, 72(4): 551-557.
  • Chazirakis, P., Giannis, A., Gidarakos, E., Wang, J.Y. and Stegmann, R. 2011. Application of sludge, organic solid wastes and yard trimmings in aerobic compost piles. Global NEST Journal, 13(4): 405-411.
  • Chen, M., Xu, P., Zeng, G., Yang, C., Huang, D. and Zhang J. 2015. Bioremediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum, pesticides, chlorophenols and heavy metals by composting: Applications, microbes and future research needs. Biotechnology Advances, 33(6): 745-755.
  • Cooperband, L.R. 2000. Composting: Art and science of organic waste conversion to a valuable soil resource. Laboratory Medicine, 31(5): 283-290.
  • Gajalakshmi, S. and Abbasi, S. 2008. Solid waste management by composting: State of the art. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 38(5): 311-400.
  • GB 7959, 2012. Hygienic requirements for harmless disposal of night soil. Ministry of Health of the People ‘s Republic of China Press, pp. 5.
  • Guo, R., Li, G.X., Jiang, T., Schuchardt, F., Chen, T.B., Zhao, Y.Q.
  • and Shen, Y.J. 2012. Effectof aeration rate, C/N ratio and moisture content on the stability and maturity of compost. Bioresour. Technol., 112: 171-178.
  • Han, W. and He, M. 2015. Effects of exogenous enzymes on composting of straw and maturity assessment by fuzzy evaluation. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 35(11): 3742-3749.
  • Jara-Samaniego, J., Pérez-Murcia, M.D., Bustamante, M.A., PérezEspinosa, A., Paredes, C., López, M. and Moral, R. 2017. Composting as sustainable strategy for municipal solid waste management in the Chimborazo Region, Ecuador: Suitability of th e ob tain ed c omp osts for see dling p rodu ction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141: 1349-1358.
  • Juárez, M.F.D., Gómez-Brandón, M. and Insam, H. 2015. Merging two waste streams, wood ash and biowaste, results in improved composting process and end products. Science of the Total Environment, 511: 91-100.
  • Ledee, O.E., Cuthbert, F.J. and Bolstad, P.V. 2008. A remote sensing analysis of coastal habitat composition for a threatened shorebird, the piping plover (Charadrius melodus). Journal of Coastal Research, 24: 719-726.
  • Lin, T., Xue, X., Shi, L. and Gao, L. 2013. Urban spatial expansion and its impacts on island ecosystem services and landscape pattern: a case study of the island city of Xiamen, Southeast China. Ocean & Coastal management, 81: 90-96.
  • Meunchang, S., Panichsakpatana, S. and Weaver, R.W. 2005. Cocomposting of filter cake and bagasse; by- products from a sugar mill. Bioresource Technology, 96(4): 437-442.
  • Sasaki, N., Suehara, K.I., Kohda, J., Nakano, Y. and Yano, T. 2003. Effects of C/N ratio and pH of raw materials on oil degradation efûciency in a compost fermentation process. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 96: 47-52.
  • Wang, W., Liu, H., Li, Y. and Su, J. 2014. Development and management of land reclamation in China. Ocean and Coastal Management, 102: 415-425.
  • Wei, Y.S., Fan, Y.B., Wang, M.J. and Wang, J.S. 2000. Composting and compost application in China. Resource Conservat. Recycl., 30: 277-300.
  • Wong, J.W.C., Mak, K.F., Chan, N.W., Lam, A., Fang, M., Zhou, L. X. and Liao, X.D. 2011. Co-composting of soybean residues and leaves in Hong Kong. Bioresource Technology, 76(2): 99-106.
  • Zang, B., Li, S., Michel, F., Li, G., Luo, Y., Zhang, D. and Li, Y. 2016. Effects of mix ratio, moisture content and aeration rate on sulfur odor emissions during pig manure composting. Waste Management, 56: 498-505.
  • Zhang, L. and Sun, X. 2014. Changes in physical, chemical, and microbiological properties during the two-stage co-composting of green waste with spent mushroom compost and biochar. Bioresource Technology, 171: 274-284.
  • Zucconi, F., Pera, A., Forte, M. and Bertoldi M. 1981. Evaluating toxicity of immature compost. Biocycle, 22: 54-57.

Abstract Views: 211

PDF Views: 0




  • Co-Composting of Kitchen Waste, Faeces and Sewage Sludge as Sustainable Strategy for Island Waste Management: Process Dynamics

Abstract Views: 211  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Jihao Zhou
Department of Military Facilities, Army Logistics University of PLA, Chongqing, 401331, China
Jie Liu
Department of Military Facilities, Army Logistics University of PLA, Chongqing, 401331, China
Zhiwei Zhao
Department of Military Facilities, Army Logistics University of PLA, Chongqing, 401331, China
Ping Zhang
Bureau of Navy Engineering Design and Research, Beijing, 100070, China
Jie Shi
Air Force Unit 93413, Yongji, 044500, China

Abstract


Solid waste management is an inevitable challenge for Chinese government during the island construction practice in the South China Sea. Composting, if it is properly put into application, can constitute an environment friendly and sustainable method for solid waste management on these newly-built artificial coral reefs, due to its great potential to improve coral sand soil with low cost. As the key components of island solid wastes, kitchen waste, faeces and sewage sludge were combined in ratio of 1:1:1, which conformed to the actual production and constituted a mixed waste system. Thus, using a self-made intelligent reactor, this paper presented the performance and potential of mixed treatment of kitchen waste, faeces and sewage sludge through co-composting with the coamendment of sawdust and cornstalk. A series of process parameters were monitored, the laws about degradation and resynthesis of organic matter, transformation and loss of nitrogen were revealed in this paper. The results indicated that applying the aerobic composting technology to the solid waste treatment in the mixed system of kitchen waste, faeces and sewage sludge with coamendment of sawdust and cornstalk was feasible, and the optimal mixed ratio of total waste to coamendment was 4:1 on analysis of technique and economics.

Keywords


Wastes In The Islands, Kitchen Waste, Faeces, Co-Composting, Process Dynamics.

References