Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analysis of the Efficiency of Public Environmental Expenditure Based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-Tobit Model: Evidence from Central China


Affiliations
1 Center of Systems and Industrial Engineering, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450000, China
 

The increasing noticeable economic development that impact the environment increases attention on environmental protection and governance as observed by the government. Public finance expenditure on environmental protection has played an important role in controlling environmental pollution and protecting ecological environment. To explore the defects in the fiscal spending on environmental protection using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model and Tobit regression, the efficiency of public environmental expenditure in Central China from 2007 to 2015 was evaluated, and the factors that influence the efficiency of fiscal spending on environmental protection were discussed. Results reveal that fiscal spending on environmental protection in the remaining five provinces is technically inefficient, except for Hubei Province in Central China. Moreover, large differences exist among provinces in a different stage of scale return. The GDP per capita has a significant positive impact on the efficiency of fiscal expenditure on environmental protection, whereas the level of urbanization and industrialization has a significant negative impact on the efficiency of fiscal expenditure on environmental protection. The conclusions provide a decision-making reference for improving the efficiency of public environmental expenditure.

Keywords

Environmental Protection, Public Finance, Expenditure Efficiency, Tobit Model.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Andreoni, J. and Levinson, A. 2001. The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Public Economics, 80(2): 269-286.
  • Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D. and Vela-Bargues, J.M. 2002. Efficiency and quality in local government. The case of Spanish local authorities. Working paper, Department d’Economia de l’Empresa, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
  • Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9): 1078-1092.
  • Bernauer, T. and Koubi, V. 2006. States as providers of public goods: How does government size affect environmental quality? Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.900487.
  • Cheng, C.P. and Chen, Z. 2017. Analysis on the efficiency of provincial government’s financial expenditure on environmental protection and its influencing factors. Statistics and Decision, 13: 130-132.
  • Halkos, G. and Paizanos, E. 2015. Effects of macroeconomic policy on air quality: Evidence from the US. MPRA Paper No. 62001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • He, P.L., Liu, J.P. and Wang, X.X. 2011. Data envelopment analysis of the efficiency of financial investment: Based on environmental protection investment. Public Financial Research, 5: 30-34.
  • Jin, R.X. and Zhang, D. 2011. Research on the efficiency of environmental protection expenditures by provincial governments in China. Economic Management, 5: 30-34.
  • Lin, T.G. 2010. Study on public spending on environmental protection and environmental performance of prefectural cities. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 4: 600-605.
  • Liu, Z.Y., Tang, T. and Yang, W. 2009. Efficiency measurement of provincial expenditure: DEA technique. Economic Theory and Business Management, 7: 50-56.
  • López, R. and Palacios, A. 2014. Why has Europe become environmentally cleaner? Decomposing the roles of fiscal, trade and environmental policies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58(1): 91-108.
  • Lovell, C.A.K. and Eeckaut, P.V. 1993. Frontier tales: DEA and FDH. In: Diewert, W. E., Spremann, K. Stehling, F. (eds.) Mathematical Modelling in Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 446-457.
  • Pan, X.Z. 2013. Efficiency analysis of China local government’s expenditure on environmental protection. China Population, Resources and Environment, 23(11): 61-65.
  • Sun, K. and Sun, L. 2016. A study of expenditure efficiency of fiscal environment protection based on input-output ratio - a DEATobit analysis based on panel data of prefectural-level cities of Jilin Province. Taxation and Economy, 5: 101-106
  • Wei, Z. 2009. China’s fiscal expenditure: An analysis of its efficiency in the scale and structure. Dongjiang Journal, 26(4): 100-105.
  • Worthington, A.C. 2000. Cost efficiency in Australian local government: A comparative analysis of mathematical programming and econometrical approaches. Financial Accountability & Management, 16(3): 201-223.
  • Wu, Y.H. and Lu, J. 2006. Relative efficiency evaluation about city environment protection. Journal of Tianjin University (Social Sciences), 8(4): 245-249.
  • Zhao, Y., Sun, X. and Zhu, X.D. 2011. Analysis of environmental efficiencies in cities analysis of environmental efficiencies in cities. Environmental Protection Science, 37(4): 41-43.
  • Zhu, H. and Fu, Q. 2014. Calculation of efficiency on environmental expenditure and study on influential factors. China Population, Resources and Environment, 24(6): 91-96.

Abstract Views: 228

PDF Views: 0




  • Analysis of the Efficiency of Public Environmental Expenditure Based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-Tobit Model: Evidence from Central China

Abstract Views: 228  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Pengju Wang
Center of Systems and Industrial Engineering, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450000, China

Abstract


The increasing noticeable economic development that impact the environment increases attention on environmental protection and governance as observed by the government. Public finance expenditure on environmental protection has played an important role in controlling environmental pollution and protecting ecological environment. To explore the defects in the fiscal spending on environmental protection using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model and Tobit regression, the efficiency of public environmental expenditure in Central China from 2007 to 2015 was evaluated, and the factors that influence the efficiency of fiscal spending on environmental protection were discussed. Results reveal that fiscal spending on environmental protection in the remaining five provinces is technically inefficient, except for Hubei Province in Central China. Moreover, large differences exist among provinces in a different stage of scale return. The GDP per capita has a significant positive impact on the efficiency of fiscal expenditure on environmental protection, whereas the level of urbanization and industrialization has a significant negative impact on the efficiency of fiscal expenditure on environmental protection. The conclusions provide a decision-making reference for improving the efficiency of public environmental expenditure.

Keywords


Environmental Protection, Public Finance, Expenditure Efficiency, Tobit Model.

References