Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Priyan, P. K.
- An Empirical Test of Cross-Market Efficieny of Indian Index Options Market Using Put-Call Parity Condition
Abstract Views :600 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 S.K. Patel Institute of Management & Computer Studies, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, IN
2 G.H Patel Post Graduate Institute of Business Management, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Sardar Patel University, Gujarat, IN
1 S.K. Patel Institute of Management & Computer Studies, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, IN
2 G.H Patel Post Graduate Institute of Business Management, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Sardar Patel University, Gujarat, IN
Source
Drishtikon: A Management Journal, Vol 6, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 36-58Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to examine the cross market efficiency of the Indian index options, futures and cash market by testing S&P CNX Nifty index options, by Put-Call Parity condition using spot index values and futures prices. Over a period from April 01, 2008 to March 31, 2012, the daily closing prices of nifty index options contracts, spot values and futures contracts have been used in this research. The results of the sensitivity analysis of violations with respect to time to maturity and moneyness demonstrates that the majority of violations in options contract are exploitable, however, the proportion of exploitable violations severely falls after considering the transaction cost, as most of the profits were wiped out and showing negative profits. Thus, although the Indian index options market shows traces of inefficiency, in totality it is suggested that the Indian index options market is efficient as majority of violations are un-exploitable after incorporating transaction cost.Keywords
Market Efficiency, Options Market, Put-Call Parity Condition.References
- Ackert, L. F., & Tian, Y. S. (1998). The introduction of Toronto Index Participation Units and arbitrage opportunities in the Toronto 35 Index option market. Journal of Derivatives, 5, 44-53.
- Ackert, L. F., & Tian, Y. S. (1999). Efficiency in index options markets and trading in stock baskets (Working Paper 99-5). Atlanta, US: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
- Ackert, L. F., & Tian, Y. S. (2000). Evidence on the efficiency of index options markets. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review, 85(1), 40-52.
- Ackert, L. F., & Tian, Y. S. (2001). Efficiency in index options markets and trading in stock baskets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 1607-1634.
- Baesel, J. B., Shows, G., & Thorpe, E. (1983). The cost of liquidity services in listed options. Journal of Finance, 38(3), 989-995.
- Bharadwaj, A., & Wiggins, J. B. (2001). Box spread and put-call parity tests for the S&P 500 Index LEAPS market. Journal of Derivatives, 8, 62-71.
- Bhattacharya, M. (1983). Transactions data tests of efficiency of the Chicago board options exchange. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(2), 161-185.
- Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1972). The valuation of option contracts and a test of market Efficiency. Journal of Finance, 27, 399-418.
- Blomeyer, E. C., & Boyd, J. C. (1995). Efficiency tests of options on treasury bond futures contracts at the Chicago Board of Trade. International Review of Financial Analysis, 4, 169-181.
- Brown, R. L., & Easton, S. A. (1992). Empirical evidence on put-call parity in Australia: A reconciliation and further evidence. Australian Journal of Management, 17, 11-20.
- Brunetti, M., & Torricelli, C. (2005). Put-call parity and cross-markets efficiency in the index options markets: Evidence from the Italian market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 14, 508-532.
- Capelle-Blancard, G., & Chaudhury, M. (2001). Efficiency tests of the French Index (CAC 40) options market (working paper). Montreal, Canada: McGill Finance Research Center.
- Cassese, G., & Guidolin, M. (2004). Pricing and informational efficiency of the MIB30 Index Options Market. An analysis with high-frequency data. Economic Notes, 33, 275-321.
- Chesney, M., Gibson, R., & Louberge, H. (1994). Arbitrage trading and index option pricing at SOFFEX: An empirical study using daily and intradaily data. Cahiers du Department d'Economique, Faculte des Sciences Economiques, Universite de Geneve.
- Dixit, A., Yadav, S. S., & Jain, P. K. (2009). Violation of lower boundary conditions and market efficiency: An investigation into Indian options Market. Journal of Derivatives and Hedge Funds, 15(1), 3-14.
- Dixit, Alok., Yadav, S. S., & Jain, P. K. (2011). Testing lower boundary conditions for index options using futures prices: Evidences from the Indian options market. Vikalpa, 36(1), 15-31.
- Draper, P., & Fung, J. K. W. (2002). A study of arbitrage efficiency between the FTSE-100 Index futures and options contracts. Journal of Futures Markets, 22, 31-58.
- Evnine, J., & Rudd, A. (1985). Index options: The early evidence. Journal of Finance, 40, 743-756.
- Finucane, T. J. (1991). Put-call parity and expected returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26, 445-457.
- Fung, J. K. W., & Chan, K. C. (1994). On the arbitrage free pricing relationship between index futures and index options: A note. Journal of Futures Markets, 14, 957-962.
- Fung, J. K. W., Cheng, L. T. W., & Chan, K. C. (1997). The intraday pricing efficiency of Hang Seng Index options and futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets, 17, 327-331.
- Fung, J. K. W., & Fung, A. K. W. (1997). Mispricing of futures contracts: A study of index futures versus index options contracts. Journal of Derivatives, 5, 37-44.
- Fung, J. K. W., & Mok, H. M. K. (2001). Index options-futures arbitrage: A comparative study with bid/ask and transaction data. Financial Review, 36, 71-94.
- Garay, U., Ordonez, M. C., & Gonzalez, M. (2003). Tests of the put-call parity relation using options on futures on the S&P 500 Index. Derivatives Use, Trading and Regulation, 9, 259-280.
- Jensen, M.C. (1978). Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 6(1), 95-101.
- Kamara, A., & Miller, T. W. (1995). Daily and intradaily tests of European put-call parity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30, 519-539.
- Keane, S. (1983). Stock market efficiency. Philip Allan Publishers Limited.
- Klemkosky, R. C., & Resnick, B. G. (1979). Put-call parity and market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 34, 1141-1155.
- Lee, J. H., & Nayar, N. (1993). A transactions data analysis of arbitrage between index options and index futures. Journal of Futures Markets, 13, 889-902.
- Li, S. (2006). The arbitrage efficiency of Nikkei 225 options market: A putcall parity analysis. Monetary and Economics Studies, 24(2), 33-54.
- Lung, K. L. W., & Marshall, A. (2002). A study of mispricing and parity in the Hang Seng futures and options markets. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 5, 373-394.
- Merton, R. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141-183.
- Mittnik, S., & Rieken, S. (2000). Put-call parity and the information efficiency of the German DAX Index options market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 9, 259-279.
- Ofek, E., Richardson, M., & Whitelaw R. F. (2004). Limited arbitrage and short sales restrictions: Evidence from the options markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 74, 305-342.
- Phillips, S., & Smith, C. Jr. (1980). Trading costs for listed options: The implications for market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(2), 179-201.
- Rubinstein, M. (1985). Nonparametric tests of alternative option pricing models using all reported trades and quotes on thirty most active CBOE option class from August 23. Through August 31, 1978. Journal of Finance, 3, 425-442
- Stoll, H. R., (1969). The relationship between put and limits of arbitrage. Journal of Finance, 24, 801-824
- www.nse-india.com; www.rbi.org.in
- Strategies of Indian Firms in Coping With Forex Risk Management: An Inquiry Through Case-Research Method
Abstract Views :259 |
PDF Views:90
Authors
Affiliations
1 Shanti Business School, Ahmedabad, IN
2 GH Patel Institute of Management Studies, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidya Nagar, IN
1 Shanti Business School, Ahmedabad, IN
2 GH Patel Institute of Management Studies, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidya Nagar, IN
Source
SDMIMD Journal of Management, Vol 6, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 13-23Abstract
More and more Indian firms are becoming global in their operations - through exports and imports, by setting up manufacturing plants abroad and through joint-ventures and tie-ups. In this process most of them are dealing with multiple currencies. This has increased the overall exposure of Indian firms to foreign exchange-rate fluctuations. How have they been coping with the risk associated with the exchange-rate fluctuations? In order to explore this, the authors have engaged the case-research method. The authors studied 64 cases for this purpose. Of these 27, firms have been handling forex exposure and/or have had at least one near-crisis situation in the past. The remaining 37 cases are Indian firms from sectors like Textiles, IT, Gems and Jewelry, Pharma, Engineering, FMCG and Energy. The study focused on the context of these firms, their business model, the sources of forex exposure and the policies and practices of managing forex exposure risk. The authors have tried to identify the basic factors underlying the forex exposure and to identify patterns, if any, in the coping-strategy. They conclude that the insights would help formulate a generic strategy.Keywords
Case-Research Method, Forex Risk Management, Coping-Strategy.- Funding Preferences of Young Entrepreneurs of Gujarat: An Empirical Study
Abstract Views :183 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Anand Institute of Management, Gujarat Technological University, Anand, Gujarat, IN
2 G H Patel Post Gradure Institute of Business Management, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, IN
1 Anand Institute of Management, Gujarat Technological University, Anand, Gujarat, IN
2 G H Patel Post Gradure Institute of Business Management, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, IN
Source
Journal of Entrepreneurship & Management, Vol 2, No 1 (2013), Pagination: 1-12Abstract
This study makes an attempt to explore the funding preferences of young entrepreneurs of Gujarat towards financing their ventures. For this research, ventures in the knowledge based sector have been selected. The findings revealed that in the initial stages of venture development, these entrepreneurs utilized their personal savings and funds from their family and friends. They have all practiced bootstrapping extensively during the early years. There were not many cases of external funding. The awareness of these entrepreneurs towards risk capital such as angel and venture capital funding was found to be less. The study concludes with various suggestions for better penetrations of early stage financing and support mechanism in Gujarat such as strengthening the role of incubation centres, organizing business plan competitions and raising awareness of the entrepreneurs towards risk (equity) capital options.Keywords
Venture Capital, Angel Investors, Bootstrapping Techniques, Incubation Centres, Entrepreneurs.References
- Brettel, M. (2003). Business Angels in Germany: A Research Note. Venture Capital, 5(3), pp. 251-268.
- Brewer, E. III. & Genay, H. (1994). Funding Small Businesses through SBIC Programme. Retrieved from http://qa.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/ economic_perspectives/1994/ep_may_jun1994_part2_brewer.pdf (accessed on March 20, 2012)
- Bygrave, W. & Timmons, J. (1992). Venture Capital at the Crossroads. USA: Harvard Business School Press.
- Fried, V. & Hisrich, R. (1994). Towards a Model of Venture Capital Investment Decision-Making.
- Financial Management, Fall, 23(3), pp. 28-37.
- Hindle, K. & Lee, L. (2002). An Exploratory Investigation of Informal Venture Capitalists of Singapore. Venture Capital, 4(2), pp. 169-181.
- Kumar, V. (2002). Venture Stage Priorities of Indian Venture Capitalists: An Exploratory Analysis of Principal Components. ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 8(2), pp. 40-53.
- Kumar, V. & Kaura, M. (2003). Venture Capitalists’ Screening Criteria. Vikalpa, April-June, 28(2), pp.49-59
- Landstorm, H. (1993). Informal Risk Capital in Sweden and Some Institutional Comparisons. Journal of Business Venturing, November, 8(6), pp. 525-540.
- Mahembe, E. (2011). Literature Review on Small and Medium Enterprises’ Access to Credit and Support in South Africa. A Report Prepared for National Credit Regulator (NCR). Retrieved from http://www.ncr.org.za/pdfs/Literature%20Review%20on%20 SME%20Access%20to%20Credit%20in%20South%20Africa_Final%20Report_NCR_Dec%20 2011.pdf (accessed on March 15, 2012)
- Mishra, A. (2005). Indian Venture Capitalists (VCs) Investment Evaluation Criteria. Retrieved from http://129.3.20.41/eps/fin/papers/0507/0507002.pdf (accessed on April, 2009).
- Pandey, I. M. & Jang, A. (1996). Venture Capital for Financing Technology Financing in Taiwan.Technovation, September, 16(9), pp. 499-514.
- Pathak, N. Alternative Sources of Funding for SMEs in India. Retrieved from http://www.milagrow.in/ksolutions/ knowledge-bank/alternative-sources-fundingsmes-india (accessed on May 10, 2012)
- Povaly, S. (2007). Private Equity Exits. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
- Prasad, D., Bruton. G. & Vozikis, G. (2000). Signaling Value to Business Angels: The Proportion of Entrepreneur’s Net-worth Invested in a New Venture as a Decision Signal. Venture Capital, 2(3), pp.167-82.
- Reitan, B. & Sorheim, R. (2000). The Informal Venture Capital Market in Norway: Investor’s Characteristics, Behaviour and Investment Preferences. Venture Capital, 2(2), pp. 129-141.
- Saetre, A. (2003). Entrepreneurial Perspectives on Informal Venture Capital. Venture Capital, 5(1), pp.71-94.
- Sagari, S. (1992). Venture Capital Lessons from the Developed World for Developing Markets.
- International Finance Corporation Discussion, Paper 13.
- Seshasayee, R. (2012). Financing SMEs: An Industry Perspective. Retrieved from http://www.businessworld.in/businessworld/businessworld/content/Financing-SMEs-Industry-Perspective.
- html?print=yes (accessed on May 15, 2012)
- Sharma, N. (2002). Strategic Management of Venture Capital: An Indian Perspective. New Delhi: New Century Publications.
- Silva, J. (2004). Venture Capitalists’ Decision-Making in Small Equity Markets: A Case Study Using Participant Observation. Venture Capital, AprilSeptember, 6(2/3), pp. 125-145.
- Sorheim, R. & Landstorm, H. (2001). Informal Investors: A Categorization with Policy Implications.
- Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, October, 13(4), pp. 351-370.
- Sriraman, V. Enhancing Competitiveness of the Bottom of the Pyramid - The Role of Small and Medium Enterprises and Rural Artisan Clusters In India.Retrieved from http://innovation.gov.in/innovation/ inntoolkit/media/Enhancing_Competitiveness.pdf (accessed on April 11, 2012)
- Srinivas, Y. (2005). Bank Finance to the SME SectorIssues and Perspective. The Chartered Accountant.
- (pp. 436-439). Retrieved from http://icai.org/resource_ file/10443436-439.pdf (accessed on April 20, 2012)
- Sweeting, R. (1991). UK Venture Capital Funds and the Funding of New Technology-Based Businesses: Process and Relationships. Journal of Management Studies, November, 28(6), pp. 601-622.
- Tyebjee, T. & Bruno, A. (1984). A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity. Management Science, 30(9), pp. 1051-1066.
- Van Osnabrugge, M. (2000). A Comparison of Business Angels and Venture Capital Investment Procedures: An Agency Theory Based Analysis, Venture Capital, 2(2), pp. 91-109.
- Yuen-Ping, H. & Poh-Kam, W. (2005). Availability of Financing, Regulatory Business Costs and National Entrepreneurial Propensity. Retrieved from http://129.3.20.41/eps/io/papers/0504/0504025.pdf (accessed on April 10, 2012)
- Zimmere, T. & Norman, M. (2005). Essentials of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management.
- New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Private Limited.
- Webography
- Risk Capital and MSMEs in India. Retrieved from http:// www.msmementor.in/SIDBI_Publications/Risk%20 Capital%20and%20MSMEs%20in%20India.pdf (accessed on April 20, 2012)