Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ghosh, Jayanta
- The SEPs Debate and Surrounding Issues: Part -IV
Abstract Views :97 |
PDF Views:72
Authors
Affiliations
1 Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi — 110 007, Delhi, IN
2 West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Salt Lake City — 700 106, Kolkata, IN
1 Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi — 110 007, Delhi, IN
2 West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Salt Lake City — 700 106, Kolkata, IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 28, No 4 (2023), Pagination: 323-333Abstract
The domain of SEPs is highly engrossed with multitude of issues, as it is generally understood. Most of the issues come from patent holders' anti-competitive behavior, which includes unilateral rejection to license, patent ambushes, patent hold-ups, strategic injunctive relief, royalty staking, and breach of F/RAND Commitments, both inside and outside of SSOs (national & international). One of the key tenets of standards is that they be universally recognized and applied once they have been approved. Suppliers view standards as a way to meet consumer needs while also offering a chance to pave the way for innovation through compatibility, complementarily and interoperability. Standards thus have an impact on both innovation and the dissemination of technology since they create a technological infrastructure with a significant public benefit component. The previous article provided the readers with a comprehensive introduction to SEPs and their implications in the modern intellectual property landscape. This issue of this yearlong series will take the baton further to dwell on the issues circumventing around this domain of SEPs.Keywords
SEP, SSO, F/RAND, ASI, BIS, ETSI.References
- ILO, Non-Standard Employment around World, Understanding the Challenges and Shaping Prospects, Geneva (2016).
- Pılena A & Mežinska I, Standardization as catalyst for open & responsible innovation, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2017, 187.
- https://blog.ipleaders.in/law-of-contracts-notes/ (accessed on 2 June 2022).
- Yogesh P, Standard Essential Patens: Prolegomena, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2014) 59.
- Geradin D, Pricing abuses by essential patent holders in standard-setting context: View from Europe, Antitrust Law Journal, 76 (2009) 329.
- Bharadwaj A, Devaiah V H & Gupta I, Multi-dimensional Approaches Towards New Technology, Springer Open, 2018.
- Emeterio M, Antitrust deterrence of patent holdup: Refocusing on competition as a driver of technological innovation, UC Irvine Law Review, 2022, 12.
- https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/4-621-1358?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&fir stPage=true (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Chien C, 'Holding Up' & 'Holding Out', Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 2014, 21.
- Dornis T W, SEP & F/RAND Licensing-At crossroads of economic theory & legal practice, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2020.
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (accessed on 25 June 2022).
- Micromax v Ericsson, Case No. 50/2013, Competition Commission of India, 12 November 2013.
- https://voxeu.org/article/licensing-standard-essential-patents (accessed on 2 July 2022).
- Epstein R A & Noroozi K B, Why incentives for "Patent Holdout" threaten to dismantle F/RAND, and why it matters, University of Chicago Law School Chicago, 2017.
- Simcoe T, Graham S & Feldman M, 'Competing on standards? Entrepreneurship, intellectual property, and platform, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18 (2009) 775.
- Sidak J, What aggregate royalty do manufacturers of mobile phones pay to license Standard-Essential Patents? The Criterion Journal on Innovation, 1 (2016) 701.
- No.13-1489 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
- https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2020/11/17/F/RAND-royalty-base-statements-and-cellular-wireless-standard-essential-patents-part-iii/id=127397/ (accessed on 13 July 2022).
- Ericsson v Micromax, CS(OS) 442/2013, 12 November 2014.
- Galetovicy A & Guptaz K, Royalty stacking and Standard Essential Patents: Theory and evidence from the world mobile wireless industry, June 2016.
- CRS Report for Congress, Availability of Injunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patent Holders, 2013.
- Sidak J, Is a FRAND royalty a point or a range? Criterion Journal on Innovation, 2 (2017) 401.
- https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2015/03/article_0003.html (accessed on 1 July 2022).
- Justus B, Technology Standards & Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to Searle Center Database, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2018, 27.
- Baron J, Contreras J L, et al., Making rules: The Governance of the Standard Development Organizations & their Policies on IPR, JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 29655 EN, March 2019.
- Antony T, Competition Policy Roots of Intellectual Property Law: A Reflection, 2021, 10.1017/9781108157827.008.
- Copyright Infringement and Exemption Clause on Indian Copyright Law: Issues and Challenges
Abstract Views :55 |
PDF Views:34
Authors
Affiliations
1 The WB National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata - 700 106, IN
2 DPIIT IPR Chair, The WB National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata - 700 106, IN
1 The WB National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata - 700 106, IN
2 DPIIT IPR Chair, The WB National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata - 700 106, IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 29, No 1 (2024), Pagination: 43-49Abstract
The production or use of copyrighted material without permission of the copyright holder is copyright infringement. Copyright laws grant the owner of the copyright exclusive rights to their own creations, imaginations, and ideas for a limited time. Intellectual property rights protection and enforcement will promote social and economic well-being, protect individual rights, and promote trade, competition, and innovation. Exception and limitations in Copyright Laws are provisions that allow the use of copyrighted works without prior authorisation or a license from its owner in the public interest. But there has been seen that copyright infringement is taking place in the society. As the Clubs, bars and five stars restaurants are playing music by DJs of the famous singers and earning huge money day by day. It is pure economic exploitation of the creativity as per laws where singers should get the royalty benefit out of the income. If these people would get royalty, then they could pay some amount of royalty in the name of taxes to the government which would help and benefit in the country’s economy. There is relation between copyright and economy as it is for public welfare because copyright means human being’s creativity and the vice versa economy mean public income. So the aim of this research work is to share probable suggestions for the different issues on copyright exemptions clause under Indian copyright laws. This would also helpful to stop the economic exploitation of the singer as well as to raise country’s income which leads to public welfare.Keywords
Copyright, Economy, Public, Welfare, Exemption ClauseReferences
- Hettinger E C, Justifying intellectual property, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1989, 31.
- Greenhalgh C & Rogers M, Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth, Princeton University Press, 2010.
- Hoti S, McAleer M & Slottje D, Intellectual property litigation activity in the USA, Journal of Economic Surveys, 20 (4) (2006) 715-729.
- Konan D E, La Croix S J Roumasset J A & Heinrich J, Intellectual property rights in the Asian‐Pacific Region: Problems, patterns, and policy, Asian‐Pacific Economic Literature, 9 (2) (1995) 13-35.
- Landes W M & Posner R A, An economic analysis of Copyright Law, The Journal of Legal Studies, 18 (2) (1989) 325.
- Andersen B, Kozul‐Wright, R & Kozul‐Wright Z, Rents, rights n'rhythm: cooperation, conflict and capabilities in the music industry, Industry and Innovation, 14 (5) (2007) 513.
- Garhammer M, Pace of life and enjoyment of life, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3 (3) (2002) 217.
- Taylor T D, Strange Sounds: Music, Technology and Culture, Routledge, 2014.
- Mashelkar R A, General D & Bhawan A, Intellectual property rights and the Third World, Current Science, 81 (8) (2001) 955.
- World Intellectual Property Organization, Para vii.9.
- Stojkov A, Naumovski G & Naumovski V, Economics of copyright: Challenges and perspectives, Mizan Law Review, 7 (1) (2013) 126-138.
- David P A, Intellectual property institutions and the panda’s thumb: Patents, copyrights, and trade secrets in economic theory and history, Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology, 19 (1993) 29.
- Lerner J, The architecture of innovation: The economics of creative organizations, Harvard Business Press, 2012.
- Kaldor N, The economic aspects of advertising, The Review of Economic Studies, 18 (1) (1950) 1.
- Landes W M & Posner R A, The economic structure of Intellectual Property Law, Harvard University Press, 2003.
- Okediji R L, Regulation of creativity under the WIPO internet treaties, Fordham L Rev, 77 (2008) 2379.
- Brown M F, Can culture be copyrighted? Current Anthropology, 39 (2) (1998) 193-222.
- Joyce C, Ochoa T T, Carroll M W, Leaffer M A & Jaszi P Copyright law Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2016, 542.
- Fisher W, Theories of intellectual property, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
- Schröder R & Lenoble J, Theories of Justice, Copyright and Music: Is the modern copyright system fair? Faculté de droit et de criminologie, Université catholique de Louvain, 2015, Prom.: Lenoble, Jacques. http:// hdl.handle.net/2078.1/ thesis:3344
- Gordon W J, A property right in self-expression: Equality and individualism in the natural law of intellectual property, The Yale Law Journal, 102 (7) (1993) 1533.
- Liebowitz S J & Watt R, How to best ensure remuneration for creators in the market for music? Copyright and its alternatives, Journal of Economic Surveys, 20 (4) (2006) 513.
- Elkin-Koren N, Copyright policy and the limits of freedom of contract, Berkeley Tech Law Journal, 12 (1997) 93.
- Loren L P, Redefining the market failure approach to fair use in an era of Copyright permission systems, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (1997) 1.
- Maskus K E, Intellectual property rights in the global economy, Peterson Institute, 2000.
- Towse R, Copyright and artists: A view from cultural economics, Journal of Economic Surveys, 20 (4) (2006) 567-585.
- Besen S M & Raskind L J, An introduction to the law and economics of intellectual property, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1) (1991) 3.
- (1935) ILR16LAH103.
- 1995 IIAD Delhi 905.
- Lysloff R T, Musical community on the Internet: An on-line ethnography, Cultural Anthropology, (2003) 233.
- Bard R L & Kurlantzick L S, Public performance right in recordings: How to alter the Copyright system without improving it, Geo Wash Law Review, 43 (1974) 152.
- 228 F. 1021 (1915).
- Frith S, Copyright and the music business, Popular Music, 7 (1) (1988) 57.
- 2012 (50) PTC460 (Del).