Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Crop-Livestock Integration:The Ensuing Conflicts and Resolution Strategies among Rural Dwellers in Ogun State, Nigeria


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Crop and livestock production constitute main economies of the rural households with most of them cultivating arable crops and rearing small farm animals for both consumption and marketing. It is however chagrin to observe that the small farm animals are conflict-laden owing to their behavioural instincts and free range management system in the rural areas. Interaction with the rural dwellers in the study area through the use of interview guide and field observation showed that the small farm animals infringe on social and economic rights of the rural dwellers in terms of grazing the cultivated farms, feeding on or soiling of agro-produce undergoing processing, littering of the environment with faeces by sheep and goats; scattering of cultivated heaps or mounds in search of food, feeding on emerging seedlings, overturning and soiling of processed foods by local chickens. The ensuing conflicts in this regard often take the form of inter-personal, interfamily and community-to-person conflict. For resolution of the conflicts, statistical test of the study hypotheses showed that restraint of the farm animals from roaming about and siting of farms away from the villages had mutual acceptability among the rural dwellers. It was concluded that the rearing of small farm animals on free range constitute a conflict potential at the micro level of the rural areas; and was recommended that the small farm animal should be kept under intensive or semi-intensive management system.

Keywords

Crop Cultivation, Small Farm Animals, Conflict Ensuing Behaviours, Conflict Action, Communal Resolution Strategies.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Asiyanbola, R. A. (2009), Identity Issues in Urban Ethno-communal Conflict in Africa: An Empirical Study of Ife-Modakeke Crisis in Nigeria, African Sociological Review 13(2), 81 - 100.
  • Bailey, K.D. (1982), Methods of Social Research. (2ne edn), The Free Press: New York.
  • Barash, D.P. and Webel, C.P. (2002), Peace and Conflict Studies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Bassey, C. O. (2007), Introduction: The Nexus of Conflict and Development Crisis in Africa. In C. O. Bassey & O. O. Oshita (Eds.) Conflict Resolution, Identity Crisis and Development in Africa, XV, Malthouse Press Limited: Lagos.
  • Blackburn, H. (1998), Livestock Production, The Environment and Mixed Farming System, In A. J. Nell (Ed.) Livestock and the Environment International Conference Proceedings, FAO/World Bank/USAID, Wageningen. pp 114-123.
  • Blench, R. (2010), Conflict Between Pastoralists and Cultivators in Nigeria, A Review Paper Prepared for DFID, Nigeria, Retrieved, December 11, 2016 from http://www.rogerblench.info/RBOP.htm
  • Breusers, M. & Nederlof, S. (1998), Conflict or Symposium? Disentangling Farmer-heardsman Relations: The Mossi and Fulbe of the Central Plateau, Burkina Faso, Journal of Modern African Studies, 36(3), 367 – 381.
  • Collins, R. (1990), Conflict Theory and the Advance of Macro-historical Sociology, In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Synthesis, New York Columbia University Press. pp 68 – 87.
  • Coppock, D. L., Desta, S., Tezerra, S. & Gebru, G. (2006), An Innovation System in the Rangelands: Using Collective Action to Diversify Livelihoods among Settled Pastoral Women in Ethiopia, Paper Presented at Innovation Africa Symposium, Held in Kampala, Uganda.
  • de Haan, C., Steinfield, H., Blackburn, H. (1997), Livestock and the Environment: Finding a Balance. Food and Agriculture Organisation/World Bank/United States Agency for International Development.
  • Ekong, E. E. (2003), Rural Sociology: An Introduction and Analysis of Rural Nigeria, Dove Educational Publishers, Uyo, Nigeria.
  • Folarin, S. F. (n.d.). Types and Causes of Conflict, Chapter Three. Retrieved May 27, 2016, from http:// eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/3241/1/Folarin%2025.pdf
  • Gish, O. (2005), Livestock Health Delivery System, International Journal of Animal Health Services, 3: 74 – 80.
  • Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company,
  • Idowu, I. A. (1988), Links Between Agricultural Research and Extension in Nigeria, Hamburg.Verlag, Weltarchiv GmbH 296 pp.
  • Jeong, H. (2000), Peace and Conflict Studies: An Introduction, Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Lawal-Adebowale, O. A. & Oyegbami, A. (2004), Determinants of Seasonal Arable Crop Production Among Selected Farmers in Ogun State, Moor Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(1), 49 – 58.
  • Meadows, R. (1995), Livestock Legacy, Environmental Health Perspectives, 103(12), 1096 – 1100.
  • Morell, J. (2009), Thanks, But This Isn’t For Us. Penguin. London.
  • Lungu, J. C. N. (n.d.). Mixed Crop-livestock Production Systems of Smallholder Farmers in Sub-humid and Semi-arid areas of Zambia. pp 13 –139. Retrieved November 12, 2016 from http://www.iaea.org/inis/ collection/NCLCollectionStore/Public/ 33/032/33032980.pdf
  • New World Encyclopaedia (2008), Conflict Theory, Retrieved August 1, 2016 from http:// www.newworldencyclopaedia.org/entry/conflict_theory
  • Nicholson, M. (1992), Rationality and the Analysis of International Conflict, Cambridge 12: University Press.
  • Oksen, P. (2000), Cattle, Conflict and Change: Animal Husbandry and Fulani-farmer Interactions in Boulgou Province, Burkina Faso, PhD Thesis, Roskild University, Denmark, 230pp.
  • Oladoyin, A. M. (2001), State and Ethno-communal Violence in Nigeria: The Case of Ife-Modakeke, Africa Development, 26 (1 & 2), 195 – 223.
  • Oluwatayo, I. B. & Oluwatayo, T. B. (2012), Small Ruminants as a Source of Financial Security: A Case Study of Women in Rural Southwest Nigeria, Institute for Money, Technology and Financial Inclusion, Working Paper 1. pp 1-21.
  • Oyeniyi, A. (2011), Conflict and Violence in Africa: Causes, Sources and Types, Transcend Media Service, Retrieved April 2016 from https://www.transcend.org/tms/?p=10359
  • Ragle, J. (2007), Fighting Fair: To Resolve Conflict, Counselling and Mental Health Centre: University of Texas, Retrieved November 17, 2016 from http://www.utexas.edu/fighting/fighting.html#anchor94395.
  • Roessler, R., Drucker, A. G., Scarpa, R., Markemann,A., Lemke, U., Thuy, L. T. & Valle Zárate. A. (2007), Using Choice Experiments to Assess Smallholder Farmers’ Preferences for Pig Breeding Traits in Different Production Systems in North–West Vietnam, Ecological Economic 66: 184 – 192.
  • Rossel, J. &. Collins, R. (2001), Conflict Theory and Interaction Rituals, In J. H. Turner (Ed.). Handbook of Sociological Theory, New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp 509 – 531.
  • Rothchild, D. (1997), Managing Ethnic Conflict in Africa, Brooking Institution Press. Washington, D.C:
  • Shinar, D. (2003), The Peace Process in Cultural Conflict: The Role of the Media, Conflict and Communication Online, 2(1), 1 – 10.

Abstract Views: 221

PDF Views: 0




  • Crop-Livestock Integration:The Ensuing Conflicts and Resolution Strategies among Rural Dwellers in Ogun State, Nigeria

Abstract Views: 221  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Lawal Adebowale
Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria

Abstract


Crop and livestock production constitute main economies of the rural households with most of them cultivating arable crops and rearing small farm animals for both consumption and marketing. It is however chagrin to observe that the small farm animals are conflict-laden owing to their behavioural instincts and free range management system in the rural areas. Interaction with the rural dwellers in the study area through the use of interview guide and field observation showed that the small farm animals infringe on social and economic rights of the rural dwellers in terms of grazing the cultivated farms, feeding on or soiling of agro-produce undergoing processing, littering of the environment with faeces by sheep and goats; scattering of cultivated heaps or mounds in search of food, feeding on emerging seedlings, overturning and soiling of processed foods by local chickens. The ensuing conflicts in this regard often take the form of inter-personal, interfamily and community-to-person conflict. For resolution of the conflicts, statistical test of the study hypotheses showed that restraint of the farm animals from roaming about and siting of farms away from the villages had mutual acceptability among the rural dwellers. It was concluded that the rearing of small farm animals on free range constitute a conflict potential at the micro level of the rural areas; and was recommended that the small farm animal should be kept under intensive or semi-intensive management system.

Keywords


Crop Cultivation, Small Farm Animals, Conflict Ensuing Behaviours, Conflict Action, Communal Resolution Strategies.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd.v37i1.170383