The Nature and Origin of Plant Viruses with an Incursion into Virus Nomenclature

Eversince, the chemical nature of not only the anisometric tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) but also the crystalline viruses like bushy stunt of tomato, tobacco necrosis virus, turnip yellow mosaic virus and others have been characterized, sap transmissible viruses have been shown to be good antigens and that their antisera had group specificity aiding identification. Whilst symptomatology alone was found unreliable and of insufficient means for diagnosis and classification of viruses, serology, chemical and physical structure of viruses and the modes of transmission have played an important role in virus nomenclature. However, it is premature to think of orthodox binomial and trinomial nomenclature as practised in fungal classification playing a role in virus terminology, Anisometric and crystalline viruses are comparatively simple chemical entities (as compared with animal viruses) and are essentially nucleoproteins where the RNA (ribonucleic acid) core has a shell of protein in a helical pattern serving as a protective coating. The infectivity of the nucleic acid alone (which is hardly 6% of the nucleoproteiri) has been proved beyond doubt whereas, the protein (which is the bulk of the virus) does not count for infectivity but plays an important role in serological reactions and consequently is of immense value in grouping viruses. Nevertheless, size, shapes and structure of viruses are of considerable significance as a tool in virus classification of rodshaped particles. Spherical virus particles, however, have not lent themselves to this approach. A somewhat similar approach to classification has been made by using specific vector-virus relationships.

In the speculative field of origin of viruses, the free gene or plasmagene theory of Darlington seems to find little support at present. Nonetheless, a biochemical approach is still valid and as all the ribonucleic acid (RNA) in the TMV appears to be present in a single polynucleotide chain, a break in this chain has to be transmitted intact to the recipient cell to enable reduplication. That the RNA may be replicated in the cells is, therefore, not to be regarded as a shortlived messenger carrying genetic information from nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) to protein. Stretching this argument one could conceive of a further step to the self-perpetuating RNA molecule capable of directing protein synthetic mechanisms in recipient cells to specific products.