Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment of Facilities, Knowledge and Counseling on Handwashing of Elementary School Students in the District of North Bogor


Affiliations
1 National Institute of Research and Development, Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
 

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the district of North Bogor to find out the relationship of facilities, knowledge and counseling to the level of behavior of the handwashing of elementary school students. This research is a quantitative study, accompanied by observations of the availability of handwashing facilities in schools. Data characteristics, facilities, counseling, behavior and knowledge of students were collected using a questionnaire. Three hundred fifty-five students (51.8% were male) registered in this study. The average age of students is 10 years (73.0%). The availability of facilities such as hand washing facilities (100%), toilets (100%), clean water (97.7%), running water (82.0%) and soap (91.3%) in schools is quite complete. The behavior of students using soap when washing their hands (76.1%), after defecating small (88.7%), and after handling animals (82.0%). Students’ knowledge about correct hand washing (73.8%), the exact duration of handwashing (22.8%). In the logistic regression analysis, gender, age and counseling were not significantly related to student behavior. However, facilities (P=0.011) and knowledge (P=0.037) are related to students’ handwashing behavior. Observation found that the availability of washbasket facilities in five schools was in good condition and functioning normally as well as the standard operational procedures for handwashing in schools, but placed in a location that is not visible to students. In short, students’ handwashing behavior is still lacking, especially among students who are in schools with inadequate facilities and have less knowledge about handwashing.


Keywords

Attitude, Counseling, Facilities, Handwashing with Soap, Knowledge, Students.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, et al.Global, regional and national causes of child mortality: An updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012; 379(9832):2151–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(12)60560-1
  • Rachmat B, Susilowati A. Prevalence and determinants of fatigue among private high school students in Bogor Tengah Sub-District, Indonesia, 2016. J Ecophysiol Occup Heal. 2019; 19:136–43. https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2019/24190
  • Moonie S, Sterling DA, Figgs LW, Castro M. The relationship between school absence, academic performance and asthma status. J Sch Health. 2008; 78(3):140–8. PMid: 18307609. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00276.x
  • Dyer DL, Shinder A, Shinder F. Alcohol-free instant hand sanitizer reduces elementary school illness absenteeism. Fam Med. 2000; 32(9):633–8.
  • Haller L, Hutton G, Bartram J. Estimating the costs and health benefits of water and sanitation improvements at global level.J Water Health. 2007; 5(4):467–80. PMid: 17878561. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2007.008
  • Aiello AE, Coulborn RM, Perez V, Larson EL. Effect of hand hygiene on infectious disease risk in the community setting: A meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(8):1372–81.PMid: 18556606 PMCid: PMC2446461. https://doi.org/10.2105/ AJPH.2007.124610
  • World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. World Health. 2009.
  • Jensen DA, Danyluk MD, Harris LJ, Schaffner DW. Quantifying the effect of hand wash duration, soap use, ground beef debris and drying methods on the removal of Enterobacter aerogenes on hands. J Food Prot. 2015; 78(4):685–90. PMid: 25836392.https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-245
  • Burton M, Cobb E, Donachie P, Judah G, Curtis V, Schmidt WP. The effect of handwashing with water or soap on bacterial contamination of hands. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011; 8(7):97–104. PMid: 21318017 PMCid: PMC3037063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8010097
  • Luby SP, Aeboatwalla M, Bowen A, Kenah E, Sharker Y, Hoekstra RM. Difficulties in maintaining improved handwashing behavior, Karachi, Pakistan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009; 81(1):140–5. PMid: 19556579. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2009.81.140
  • Luby SP, Agboatwalla M, Feikin DR, Painter J, Billhimer W, Altaf A, et al. Effect of handwashing on child health: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 366(9481):225–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66912-7
  • Talaat M, Afifi S, Dueger E, El-Ashry N, Marfin A, Kandeel A, et al. Effects of hand hygiene campaigns on incidence of laboratoryconfirmed influenza and absenteeism in schoolchildren, Cairo, Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011; 17(4):619–25. PMid:21470450 PMCid:PMC3377412. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1704.101353
  • Bieri FA, Gray DJ, Williams GM, Raso G, Li YS, Yuan L, et al.Health-education package to prevent worm infections in Chinese schoolchildren. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:1603–12. PMid: 23614586. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1204885
  • Seale AC, Mwaniki M, Newton CR, Berkley JA. Maternal and early onset neonatal bacterial sepsis: Burden and strategies for prevention in sub-Saharan Africa. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2009; 9(7):428–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S14733099(09)70172-0
  • Laxminarayan R, Chow J S-SS. Chapter 2. Intervention costeffectiveness: Overview of main messages. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries (2nd Ed). Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank; 2006. Chapter 2. Co-published by Oxford University Press, New York; 2006.
  • Jasper C, Le TT, Bartram J. Water and sanitation in schools: A systematic review of the health and educational outcomes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2012; 9(8):2772–87. PMid: 23066396 PMCid: PMC3447586. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9082772
  • Garn JV, Greene LE, Dreibelbis R, Saboori S, Rheingans RD, Freeman MC. A cluster-randomized trial assessing the impact of school water, sanitation and hygiene improvements on pupil enrolment and gender parity in enrolment. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2013; 3(4):592–601. PMid: 24392220 PMCid: PMC3876875.https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2013.217
  • Rosen L, Manor O, Engelhard D, Brody D, Rosen B, Peleg H, et al. Can a handwashing intervention make a difference? Results from a randomized controlled trial in Jerusalem preschools.Prev Med (Baltim). 2006; 42(1):27–32. PMid:16300823.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.09.012
  • WHO/UNICEF. Drinking water, sanitation and hygiene in schools. Global baseline report 2018 WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water supply , Sanitation and Hygiene. Unicef. 2018.
  • National Institute of Health Research and Development. National Report on Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) 2013. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia; 2013.
  • National Institute of Health Research and Development. National Report on Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) 2018. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia; 2018.
  • National Institute of Health Research and Development. National Report on Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) 2007. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia; 2008.
  • Ogston SA, Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Klar J, Lwanga SK.Adequacy of sample size in health studies. Biometrics. 1991; 47(1):347–8. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532527
  • Boone HN, Boone DA. Analyzing Likert data. J Ext. 2012;
  • Menard S. Applied logistic regression analysis. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. 2011.
  • Coombes Y, Devine J. Introducing FOAM: A framework to analyze handwashing behaviors to design effective handwashing programs. Working paper. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1596/27924
  • Rabbi SE, Dey NC. Exploring the gap between hand washing knowledge and practices in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional comparative study. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13(1):89. PMid: 23363772 PMCid: PMC3564897. https://doi.org/10.1186/14712458-13-89
  • CDC. Show me the science - Why wash your hands? [internet].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018 [cited 2020 Apr 29]. https://www.cdc.gov/handwashing/why-handwashing.html
  • Borchgrevink CP, Cha JM, Kim SH. Hand washing practices in a college town environment. J Environ Health. 2013; 75(8):18–24.
  • Lee MS, Hong SJ, Kim YT. Handwashing with soap and national handwashing projects in Korea: Focus on the National Handwashing Survey, 2006-2014. Epidemiol Health. 2015; 37: e2015039. PMid: 26725224 PMCid: PMC4652062. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2015039
  • Jacqueline D. Beyond tippy-taps: The role of enabling products in scaling up and sustaining handwashing. Waterlines. 2010; 29(4):304–14.
  • Leontsini E, Winch PJ. Increasing handwashing with soap: Emotional drivers or social norms? Lancet Globe Heal [Internet].2014; 2(3):e118-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S2214-109X(14)70030-0
  • Nizame FA, Leontsini E, Luby SP, Nuruzzaman M, Parveen S, Winch PJ, et al. Hygiene practices during food preparation in Rural Bangladesh: Opportunities to improve the impact of handwashing interventions. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016; 95(2):288–97. PMid: 27296388 PMCid: PMC4973173. https:// doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0377
  • Luby SP, Halder AK, Tronchet C, Akhter S, Bhuiya A, Johnston RB. Household characteristics associated with handwashing with soap in rural Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009; 81(5):882– 7. PMid:19861626. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2009.09-0031
  • Oswald WE, Hunter GC, Kramer MR, Leontsini E, Cabrera L, Lescano AG, et al. Provision of private, piped water and sewerage connections and directly observed handwashing of mothers in a peri-urban community of Lima, Peru. Trop Med Int Heal. 2014; 19(4):388–07. PMid: 24438038 PMCid: PMC4098569. https:// doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12262
  • Hirai M, Graham JP, Mattson KD, Kelsey A, Mukherji S, Cronin AA. Exploring determinants of handwashing with soap in Indonesia: A quantitative analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(9):868. PMid: 27598178 PMCid: PMC5036701.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13090868
  • White S. How can handwashing implementers consistently integrate the latest evidence in their work? [Internet]. The Global Handwashing Partnership. 2019 [cited 2020 Apr 22]. p. 1. https:// globalhandwashing.org/how-can-handwashing-implementers-consistently-integrate-the-latest-evidence-in-their-work/
  • Dreibelbis R, Kroeger A, Hossain K, Venkatesh M, Ram PK.Behavior change without behavior change communication: Nudging handwashing among primary school students in Bangladesh. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(1):E129.PMid: 26784210 PMCid: PMC4730520. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph13010129
  • Pfattheicher S, Strauch C, Diefenbacher S, Schnuerch R. A field study on watching eyes and hand hygiene compliance in a public restroom. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2018; 48(4):188–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12501
  • Watson J, Dreibelbis R, Aunger R, Deola C, King K, Long S, et al.Child’s play: Harnessing play and curiosity motives to improve child handwashing in a humanitarian setting. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019; 222(2):177–82. PMid: 30219482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.09.002
  • Curtis VA, Danquah LO, Aunger R V. Planned, motivated and habitual hygiene behaviour: An eleven country review.Health Educ Res. 2009; 24(4):655–73. PMid: 19286894 PMCid: PMC2706491. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyp002
  • Scott E, Herbold N. An in-home video study and questionnaire survey of food preparation, kitchen sanitation and hand washing practices. J Environ Health. 2010; 72(10):8–13.
  • Biran A, Schmidt WP, Wright R, Jones T, Seshadri M, Isaac P, et al.The effect of a soap promotion and hygiene education campaign on handwashing behaviour in rural India: A cluster randomised trial. Trop Med Int Heal. 2009; 14(10):1303–14. PMid: 19708896.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02373.x
  • Contzen N, Meili IH, Mosler HJ. Changing handwashing behaviour in Southern Ethiopia: A longitudinal study on infrastructural and commitment interventions. Soc Sci Med.2015; 124:103–14. PMid: 25461867 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.006
  • Rheinländer T, Samuelsen H, Dalsgaard A, Konradsen F. Teaching minority children hygiene: Investigating hygiene education in kindergartens and homes of ethnic minority children in Northern Vietnam. Ethn Heal. 2015; 20(3):258–72. PMid: 24875851.https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2014.921887
  • Biran A, Tabyshalieva A, Salmorbekova Z. Formative research for hygiene promotion in Kyrgyzstan. Health Policy and Planning.2005; 20(4):213–21. PMid: 15965033. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czi024
  • Mbouthieu Teumta GM, Niba LL, Ncheuveu NT, Ghumbemsitia MT, Itor POB, Chongwain P, et al. An institution-based assessment of students’ hand washing behavior. Biomed Res Int.2019; 2019:7178645. PMid: 31950052 PMCid: PMC6949676.https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7178645
  • Anderson JL, Warren CA, Perez E, Louis RI, Phillips S, Wheeler J, et al. Gender and ethnic differences in hand hygiene practices among college students. Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36(5):361–8.PMid: 18538703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2007.09.007
  • Thumma J, Aiello AE, Foxman B. The association between handwashing practices and illness symptoms among college students living in a university dormitory. Am J Infect Control.2009; 37(1):70–2. PMid: 18834732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2007.12.008
  • Suen LKP, So ZYY, Yeung SKW, Lo KYK, Lam SC. Epidemiological investigation on hand hygiene knowledge and behaviour: A cross-sectional study on gender disparity. BMC Public Health.2019; 29(1):401. PMid: 30975130 PMCid: PMC6460727.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6705-5
  • Prah J, Abdulai MS, Lasim OO, Emmanuel Walker AA-A.Assessment of hygiene practices among students at the University of Cape Coast, Ghana. Int Res J Public Heal. 2018; 2(21):1–9.
  • Sultana M, Alam Mahumud R, Razzaque Sarker A, Mahmud Hossain S. Hand hygiene knowledge and practice among university students: Evidence from private universities of Bangladesh. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2016; 2016:13–20.PMid: 26929673 PMCid: PMC4758791. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S98311
  • Ergin A, Bostanci M, Onal O, Bozkurt AI, Ergin N. Evaluation of students’ social hand washing knowledge, practices and skills in a university setting. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2011; 19(4):222–7.PMid: 22432398. https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a3664
  • Devamani C, Norman G. A simple microbiological tool to evaluate the effect of environmental health interventions on hand contamination. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(11):11846–59. PMid: 25407420 PMCid: PMC4245647.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111111846
  • van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020; 1–13. PMCid: PMC7121658. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.09.20033217

Abstract Views: 26

PDF Views: 1




  • Assessment of Facilities, Knowledge and Counseling on Handwashing of Elementary School Students in the District of North Bogor

Abstract Views: 26  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Totih Ratna Sondari
National Institute of Research and Development, Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Basuki Rachmat
National Institute of Research and Development, Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Amir Suudi
National Institute of Research and Development, Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Bhaskarani Widjiastuti
National Institute of Research and Development, Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Ida
National Institute of Research and Development, Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


This cross-sectional study was conducted in the district of North Bogor to find out the relationship of facilities, knowledge and counseling to the level of behavior of the handwashing of elementary school students. This research is a quantitative study, accompanied by observations of the availability of handwashing facilities in schools. Data characteristics, facilities, counseling, behavior and knowledge of students were collected using a questionnaire. Three hundred fifty-five students (51.8% were male) registered in this study. The average age of students is 10 years (73.0%). The availability of facilities such as hand washing facilities (100%), toilets (100%), clean water (97.7%), running water (82.0%) and soap (91.3%) in schools is quite complete. The behavior of students using soap when washing their hands (76.1%), after defecating small (88.7%), and after handling animals (82.0%). Students’ knowledge about correct hand washing (73.8%), the exact duration of handwashing (22.8%). In the logistic regression analysis, gender, age and counseling were not significantly related to student behavior. However, facilities (P=0.011) and knowledge (P=0.037) are related to students’ handwashing behavior. Observation found that the availability of washbasket facilities in five schools was in good condition and functioning normally as well as the standard operational procedures for handwashing in schools, but placed in a location that is not visible to students. In short, students’ handwashing behavior is still lacking, especially among students who are in schools with inadequate facilities and have less knowledge about handwashing.


Keywords


Attitude, Counseling, Facilities, Handwashing with Soap, Knowledge, Students.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh%2F2020%2F25275