Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Out of Focus or Inappropriate Paradigm Choice:What Happened to Management Research?


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, India
 

“Out of Focus or Inappropriate Paradigm Choice: What Happened to Management Research?” was published as a discussion article in Jidnyasa – Journal of Applied Management, 8(1) 2016 on which two commentaries – one by Dr. Kuldeep Kumar and the other by Dr. Ritika Mahajan – were published in Jidnyasa 8(2) 2016. Since no further commentary was received subsequently it was decided to close the discussion with a response from the author of the original article.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • 1. Aldag, R. J. and S. R. Fuller (1995). 'Research Advisory Boards to Facilitate Organizational Research', Journal of Management Inquiry, 4, pp. 41—51.
  • Hodgkinson, G, P, and P. Herriot (2002), The Role of Psychologists in Enhancing Organizational Effectiveness. In: I, T. Robertson, M. Callinan and D. Bartram (eds). Organizational Effectiveness: The Role of Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 45-60.
  • Levitt, M. A. (1996). Research can be a Pain in the Neck. Academic Emergency Medicine, 3, pp 563 -564.
  • Michel, Berry. (1995) Research and the Practice of Management: A French View. Organization Science 6(1): 104-116.
  • Omerod, Richard (1996). On the Nature of OR – Entering the Fray. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, pp 1 – 17.
  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). The Double Hurdles for Management Research. In: T. Clark (ed.). Advancement in Organizational Behavior: Essays in Honour of Derek S. Pugh. Ashgate, Hants.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, pp 599 – 620.
  • Porter, L. W. and Mckibbin, L.E. (1998). Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into 21st Century. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schon, D. A. (1995). 'The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology', Change, 27, pp. 26-35.
  • Shrivastava, P. and I. I. Mitroff (1984). 'Enhancing Organizational Research Utilization: The Role of Decision Makers' Assumptions', Academy of Management Review, 9, pp. 18-26.
  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Tsoukas, H. (1994). Refining Common Sense: Types of Knowledge in Management Studies. Journal of Management Studies, 31(6), pp 761 – 780.
  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Whitley, R. (1984). The Scientific Status of Management Research as a Practically Oriented Social Science. Journal of Management Studies, 21(4), pp 369 – 390.

Abstract Views: 254

PDF Views: 130




  • Out of Focus or Inappropriate Paradigm Choice:What Happened to Management Research?

Abstract Views: 254  |  PDF Views: 130

Authors

Subrata Chakraborty
Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, India

Abstract


“Out of Focus or Inappropriate Paradigm Choice: What Happened to Management Research?” was published as a discussion article in Jidnyasa – Journal of Applied Management, 8(1) 2016 on which two commentaries – one by Dr. Kuldeep Kumar and the other by Dr. Ritika Mahajan – were published in Jidnyasa 8(2) 2016. Since no further commentary was received subsequently it was decided to close the discussion with a response from the author of the original article.

References