Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Structural and Magnetic Fabric Studies of Recess Structures in the Western Himalaya: Implications for 1905 Kangra Earthquake


Affiliations
1 Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun - 248 001, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Kinematic information from deformation structures and magnetic fabrics are used to infer recent tectonics around Kangra and Dehradun recesses, western Himalaya. Three types of magnetic fabrics (Type I&II, III, and IV) are identified based on the angle between K3 axis and bedding pole. It was observed that Kangra recess shows more mature fabric type IV as compared to Dehradun recess, where orientation of K3 axes and tectonic fabric reveals dominance of superposed deformation. In the vicinity of Dehradun recess, normal faults occur in un-indurated Quaternary fan deposits confirming their recent formation. The observations are in conformity with earlier studies that during the 1905 Kangra earthquake, the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) (or one of its subsidiary thrusts) near Kangra showed thrusting whereas the MBT near Dehradun underwent either normal faulting or post seismic adjustments characteristic of normal faulting. The thrusting could be a result of subsurface processes whereas the normal faulting was a result of prevailing surface strains.

Keywords

Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility, Himalayan Seismicity, Magnetic Fabric Type, Superimposed Deformation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • AMBRASEYS, N. and DOUGLAS, J. (2004) Magnitude calibration of North Indian earthquakes. Geophys. Jour. Int., v.159, pp.165- 206.
  • AUDEN, J.B. (1937) The structure of the Himalaya in Garhwal. Rec. Geol. Surv. India, v.71, pp.407-433.
  • AUBOURG, C., ROCHETTE, P. and VIALON, P. (1991) Subtle stretching lineation revealed by magnetic fabric of Callovian-Oxfordian black shales (French Apls). Tectonophysics, v.185, pp.211-223
  • AUBOURG, C., ROCHETTE, P. and BERGMULLER, F. (1995) Composite magnetic fabric is weakly deformed black shales. Tectonophysics, v.87, pp.267-278
  • AVERBUCH, O., LAMOTTE, D.F. and KISSEL, C. (1992) Magnetic fabric as a structural indicator of the deformation path within a fold-thrust structrue: a test case from the Corbieres (NE, Pyrenees, France). Jour. Struct. Geol., v.14(4), pp.461-474.
  • ARUR, M.G. and HASIJA, N.L. (1986) Crustal movement studies across Ganga tear fault (in Siwaliks) at Haridwar in Uttar Pradesh, India. Proc. Internat. Symp. on Neotectonics in South Asia, Survey of India, Dehra Dun, pp.18-21.
  • BILHAM, R. and WALLACE, K. (2005) Future MW >8 earthquakes in the Himalaya: implications from the 26 Dec. 2004 MW = 9.0 earthquake on India’s eastern plate margin. Geol. Surv. India, Spec. Publ., Lucknow, v.85, pp.1-14.
  • BORRADAILE, G.J. (1987) Anisotropy of magnetic Susceptibility: rock composition vs strain. Tectonophysics, v.138, pp.327-329.
  • BORRADAILE, G.J. (1991) Correlation of strain with anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS). Pageoph, v.135, pp.15-29
  • BORRADAILE, G.J. and TARLING, D. H. (1981) The influence of deformation mechanisms on magnetic fabrics in weakly deformed rocks. Tectonophysics, v.77, 151-168.
  • BORRADAILE, G.J. and HENRY, B. (1997) Tectonic applications of magnetic susceptibility and its anisotropy. Earth Sci. Rev., v.42, pp.49-93.
  • BORRADAILE, G.J. and HAMILTON, T. (2004) Magnetic fabrics may proxy as neotectonics stress trajectories, Polis rift, Cyprus. Tectonics, v.23, TC 1001, pp.1-11.
  • CHATTERJI, G.C. and SWAMI NATH, J. (1977) The stratigraphy and structure of parts of the Simla Himalaya-a synthesis. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, v.106, pp.408-488.
  • DEVRANI, U. and DUBEY, A.K. (2009) Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility and petrofabric studies in the Garhwal Synform, Outer Lesser Himalaya: Evidence of pop-up klippen. Island Arc., v.18, pp 428-443.
  • DUBEY,A.K. (1997) Simultaneous development of noncylindrical folds, frontal ramps and transfer faults in a compressional regime: experimental investigations of Himalayan examples. Tectonics, v.16, pp.336-346.
  • DUBEY, A.K. (2004) Structural evolution of the Himalaya: field studies, experimental models, and implications for seismicity. Himalayan Geol., v.25, pp.33-50.
  • DUBEY, A.K. and BHAT, M.I. (1991) Structural evolution of the Simla area, NW Himalayas: implications for crustal thickening. Jour. Southeast Asian Earth Sci., v.6, pp.41-53.
  • DUBEY, A.K., MISRA, R. and BHAKUNI, S.S. (2001) Erratic shortening from balanced cross-sections of the western Himalayan foreland basin: causes and implications for basin evolution. Jour. Asian Earth Sci., v.19, pp.765-777.
  • DUBEY, A.K., BHAKUNI, S.S. and SELOKAR, A.D. (2004) Structural evolution of the Kangra recess, Himachal Himalaya; a model based on magnetic and petrofabric strains. Jour. Asian Earth Sci., v.24, pp.245-258.
  • DUBEY, A.K. and JAYANGONDAPERUMAL, R. (2005) Pop-up klippen in the Mussoorie Syncline Lesser Himalaya: evidence from field and model deformation studies. In: P.S. Saklani (Ed.), Himalaya (Geological Aspects), Satish Serial Publishing House, Delhi, v.3, pp.203-222.
  • GAHALAUT, V. K. and CHANDER, R. (1997) Evidence for an Earthquake Cycle in NW Outer Himalaya Near 78°E Longitude from Precision Leveling Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., v.24(3), pp.225-228.
  • GUPTA, H.K. and GUPTA, G.D. (Eds.) (1995) Uttarkashi earthquake (20 October, 1991). Mem. Geol. Soc. India, no.30, 233p.
  • HAMILTON, N. and REES,A.F. (1970) The use of magnetic fabric in paleocurrent estimation. In: S.K. Runcorn (Ed.), Palaeogeophysics. Academic Press, London, pp.445-463.
  • HOUGH, S.E., BILHAM, R., AMBRASEYS, N. and FELDL, N. (2005) The 1905 Kangra and Dehra Dun earthquakes. Geol. Surv. India, Spec. Publ., no.85, pp.15-22.
  • HOUSEN, B.A. and VAN DER PLUIJM (1991) Slaty cleavage development and magnetic anisotropy fabrics (AMS and ARMA). Jour. Geophys. Res., v.96, pp.9937-9946.
  • HOUSEN B. A., TOBIN, H.J., LABAUME, P., LEITCH, E.C., MALTMAN, A. and ODP LEG 156 SHIPBOARD SCIENCE PARTY (1996) Strain decoupling across the decollement of the Barbados accretionary prism. Geology, v.24(2), pp.127-130.
  • JAYANGONDAPERUMAL, R. and DUBEY, A.K. (2001) Superposed folding of blind thrust and formation of klippen: results of anisotropic magnetic susceptibility from the Lesser Himalaya. Jour. Asian Earth Sci., v.19, pp.713-725.
  • KANDPAL, G.C., JOSHI, K.C., JOSHI, D.D., SINGH, B.K. and SINGH, J. (2006) Signature of Quaternary tectonics in a part of Dehra Dun valley, Uttaranchal. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.67, pp.147-150.
  • KISSEL, C., BARRIER, E., LAJ, C. and LEE, T.Q. (1986) Magnetic fabric in 'undeformed’ marine clays from compressional zones. Tectonics, v.5, pp.769-781.
  • KUMAR, S., WESNOUSKY, S.G., ROCKWELL, T.K., BRIGGS, R.W., THAKUR,V.C. and JAYANGONDAPERUMAL, R. (2006) Paleoseismic evidence of great surface rupture earthquakes along the Indian Himalaya. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.111, B03304, doi: 10.1029/ 2004JB003309.
  • LEE,T.Q. and ANGELIER, J. (2000) Tectonic significance of magnetic susceptibility fabrics in Plio-Quaternary mudstones of southwestern foothills, Taiwan. Earth Planets Space, v.52, pp.527-538
  • LYON-CAEN, H. and MOLNAR, P. (1983) Constraints on the structure of the Himalaya from an analysis of gravity anomalies and a flexural model of the lithosphere. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.88, pp.8171-8191.
  • MAJUMDER, S. and MAMTANI, M.A. (2009) Magnetic fabric in the Malanjkhand Granite (central India)-implications for regional tectonics and Proterozoic suturing of the Indian shield. Phys. Earth and Planet. Int., v.172, pp.310-323.
  • MAMTANI, M.A. and SENGUPTA, A. (2009) Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility analysis of deformed kaolinite: implications for evaluating landslides. Inter. Jour. Earth Sci., v.98, pp.1721-1725.
  • MANDAL, P., RASTOGI, B.K. and KOUSALYA, M. (2002). A fault model for the Chamoli earthquake from after shock studies. Himalayan Geol., v.23, pp.25-38.
  • MIDDLEMISS, C.S. (1910) The Kangra earthquake of 4th April 1905. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, v.37, pp.409 (Reprinted, 1981).
  • MUKHERJI, M.A., CHAUDHURI, A.K. and MAMTANI, M.A. (2004) Regional scale strain variations in Banded Iron Formations of eastern India: results from anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility studies. Jour. Struct. Geol., v.26, pp.2175-2189.
  • NAKATA, T. (1972) Geomorphic History and Crustal movements of the Foot-Hills of the Himalaya. Sci. Reports, Tohoku Univ., 7th Series (Geography), v. 22, pp.40-177.
  • OWENS,W.H. (1993) Magnetic fabric studies of samples from Hole 808c, Nankai trough. In: I.A. Hill, J.V. Taira Firth et al. (Eds.), Proc, Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific results, Ocean Drilling Program, v.13, pp.301-310.
  • PARES, J. M. (2004) How deformed are weakly deformed mud rocks? Insights from magnetic anisotropy. In: F. Martin-Hernandez, C. Aubourg and M. Jackson (Eds.), Magnetic Fabrics: Methods and Applications. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., v. 238, pp.191-203.
  • PARES, J.M. and VAN DER PLUIJM, B. (2002) Evaluating magnetic lineations (AMS) in deformed rocks. Tectonophysics, v.350, pp.283-298.
  • PARÉS, J.M., VAN DER PLUIJM, B.A. and DINARES-TURELL, J. (1999) Evolution of magnetic fabrics during incipient deformation of mudrocks (Pyrenees, northern Spain). Tectonophysics, v.307, pp.1-14
  • PILGRIM, G.E. and WEST,W.D. (1928) The structure and correlation of the Simla rocks. Memoir of the Geological Survey of India, v.53, pp.1-140.
  • RAIVERMAN, V. (2002) Foreland Sedimentation in Himalayan Tectonic Regime: A Relook at the Orogenic Process. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, pp.378.
  • RAIVERMAN, V., KUNTE, S.V. and MUKHERJEA, A. (1983) Basin geometry, Cenozoic sedimentation and hydrocarbon prospects in Northwestern Himalaya and Indo-Gangetic plains. Petroleum Asia Jour., v.6, pp.67-92.
  • RAJAL, B.S., VIRDI, N.S. and HASIJA, N.L. (1986) Recent crustal uplift in the Doon valley. Proc. Internat. Symp. on Neotectonics in South Asia, Survey of India, Dehra Dun, pp.146-157.
  • RAUTELA, P. and SATI, D. (1996) Recent crustal adjustments in Dehra Dun valley, western Uttar Pradesh, India. Curr. Sci., v.71, pp.776-780.
  • ROBION, P., GRELAUD, S. and FRIZON DE LAMOTTE, D. (2007) Prefolding magnetic fabrics in fold-and-thrust belts: Why the apparent internal deformation of the sedimentary rocks from the Minervois basin (NE-Pyrenees, France) is so high compared to the Potwar basin (SW-Himalaya, Pakistan)?. Sedimentary Geol., v.196,pp.181-200
  • ROCHETTE, P.,AUBOURG, C. and PERRIN, M. (1999) Is this magnetic fabric normal? A review and case studies in volcanic formations. Tectonophysics, v.307, pp.219-234.
  • SCHWEHR, K. and TAUXE, L. (2003) Characterization of softsediment deformation: Detection of cryptoslumps using magnetic methods. Geology, v.31,pp.203-206
  • SEN, K., MAJUMDER, S. and MAMTANI, M.A. (2005) Degree of magnetic anisotropy as a strain intensity gauge in ferromagnetic granites. Jour. Geol. Soc. London, v.162, pp.583-586.
  • SRIKANTIA, S.V. and SHARMA, R.P. (1976) Geology of the Shali Belt and the adjoining areas. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, v.106, pp.31-166.
  • SRIVASTAVA, D.C. and JOHN, G. (1999) Deformation in the Himalayan frontal fault zone: evidence from small-scale structures in Mohand-Khara area, NW Himalaya. Gondwana Research Group Memoir, Osaka, Japan, v.6, pp.273-284.
  • TARLING, D.H. and HROUDA, F. (1993) The Magnetic Anisotropy of Rocks, Chapman and Hall, London, 212p.
  • THAKUR, V.C. and PANDEY, A.K. (2004) Late Quaternary tectonic evolution of Dun in fault bend/propagated fold system, Garhwal Sub-Himalaya. Curr. Sci., v.87, pp.1567-1576.
  • VALDIYA, K.S. (1980) Geology of the Kumaun Lesser Himalaya. Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehra Dun, 291p.

Abstract Views: 169

PDF Views: 0




  • Structural and Magnetic Fabric Studies of Recess Structures in the Western Himalaya: Implications for 1905 Kangra Earthquake

Abstract Views: 169  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

R. Jayangondaperumal
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun - 248 001, India
A. K. Dubey
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun - 248 001, India
K. Sen
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun - 248 001, India

Abstract


Kinematic information from deformation structures and magnetic fabrics are used to infer recent tectonics around Kangra and Dehradun recesses, western Himalaya. Three types of magnetic fabrics (Type I&II, III, and IV) are identified based on the angle between K3 axis and bedding pole. It was observed that Kangra recess shows more mature fabric type IV as compared to Dehradun recess, where orientation of K3 axes and tectonic fabric reveals dominance of superposed deformation. In the vicinity of Dehradun recess, normal faults occur in un-indurated Quaternary fan deposits confirming their recent formation. The observations are in conformity with earlier studies that during the 1905 Kangra earthquake, the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) (or one of its subsidiary thrusts) near Kangra showed thrusting whereas the MBT near Dehradun underwent either normal faulting or post seismic adjustments characteristic of normal faulting. The thrusting could be a result of subsurface processes whereas the normal faulting was a result of prevailing surface strains.

Keywords


Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility, Himalayan Seismicity, Magnetic Fabric Type, Superimposed Deformation.

References