Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Do Engineering Educators Read?: Appraising a University Reading Program


Affiliations
1 University of Saint Louis, Tuguegarao City, Philippines
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper sought to find out how effective implementing a reading program called Project Read Everything About your Field, Digest, and Share (Project READS) among the School of Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology Education (SEAITE) faculty members of the University of Saint Louis, Philippines, because of the underutilization of library resources. As it has been five years since its implementation, the need to find out how well the Project Implementation was necessary. This descriptive study then presents the evaluation of the Project READS program of the among full-time and part-time engineering educators. The results reveal that most of them are engaged in professional readings along their field of specialization. Moreover, Project READS is effective and sustainable. Suggestions to further improve the Project's implementation are also advanced to fully appreciate this professional reading project's effect on engineering educators and learners.

Keywords

Project READS, Reading Program, Effectiveness of a Reading Program in Engineering and Architecture.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bean, R. M. (2004). Professional development: Key to effective reading instruction. New England Reading Association Journal, 40(2), 12.

  • Bruford R. (2014). The Importance of professional reading, 25 June 2014. https://richardbruford.com/2014/06/25/theimportanceof-professional-reading/

  • Caspe, M., Lopez, M. E., Chu, A., & Weiss, H. B. (2011). Teaching the teachers: Preparing educators to engage families for student achievement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.

  • Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 23(2), 145-170.

  • Cunningham, Don & Stewart, Jill (2012). Perceptions and Practices: A Survey of Professional Engineers and Architects", International Scholarly Research Notices vol. 2012, Article ID 617137, 10 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/617137

  • Doubek, M. B., & Cooper, E. J. (2007). Closing the gap through professional development: Implications for reading research. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(3), 411-415.

  • Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7),636-644.

  • https://managementhelp.org/evaluation/program-evaluation-guide.htm#anchor1575679

  • https://www.greatschoolspartnership.org/resource s/glossary-of-education-reform/

  • https://www.edglossary.org/professionaldevelopment/

  • https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2017/may/20/secret-teacher-were-not-reading-so-why-do-we-assume-children-will

  • Karl, Peter (2018). The Biggest Thing Holding Back Your Engineering Career (It's not better code.) https://www.drift.com/blog/engineersshouldread/

  • Kim, C., & Fortner, R. (2007). Educators' views of collaboration with scientists. American Secondary Education, 29-53.

  • Macalister, J. (2010). Investigating teacher attitudes to extensive reading practices in higher education: Why isn't everyone doing it?. Relc Journal, 41(1), 59-75.

  • McNiff, J. (2010). Action research for professional development: Concise advice for new action researchers. Dorset: September books.

  • Moats, L. C. (2004). Science, language, and imagination in the professional development of reading teachers. The voice of evidence in reading research, 269-287.

  • Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of educational research, 81(3), 376-407.

  • Pattaguan, E.J.P., Surla, R.A., & Tindowen, D.J.(2019) Teachers' professional reading program in higher education: an evaluation. Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(10): 2082-2088.

  • Powell, MP (2005). Teachers and Professional Reading: A Study of Reading Experience and Administrative Support across Traditional, Paideia, and PDS Schools. Retrieved from https://baylor-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2104/3001/MichellePettijohn.phd.pdf?sequence=4

  • Rudland, Neale & Kemp, Coral (2004) The professional reading habits of teachers: Implications for student learning, Australasian Journal of Special Education,28:1, 4-17, DOI: 10.1080/1030011040280102

  • Singh, K., & Shifflette, L. M. (1996). Teachers' perspectives on professional development. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(2), 145-160.

  • Smith, E. T. (2003). Changes in faculty reading behaviors: the impact of electronic journals on the University of Georgia. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,29(3), 162-168.

  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24(1), 80-91.


Abstract Views: 210

PDF Views: 105




  • Do Engineering Educators Read?: Appraising a University Reading Program

Abstract Views: 210  |  PDF Views: 105

Authors

Emmanuel James P. Pattaguan
University of Saint Louis, Tuguegarao City, Philippines

Abstract


This paper sought to find out how effective implementing a reading program called Project Read Everything About your Field, Digest, and Share (Project READS) among the School of Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology Education (SEAITE) faculty members of the University of Saint Louis, Philippines, because of the underutilization of library resources. As it has been five years since its implementation, the need to find out how well the Project Implementation was necessary. This descriptive study then presents the evaluation of the Project READS program of the among full-time and part-time engineering educators. The results reveal that most of them are engaged in professional readings along their field of specialization. Moreover, Project READS is effective and sustainable. Suggestions to further improve the Project's implementation are also advanced to fully appreciate this professional reading project's effect on engineering educators and learners.

Keywords


Project READS, Reading Program, Effectiveness of a Reading Program in Engineering and Architecture.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2021%2Fv35i2%2F155834