Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Program Assessment and Evaluation for Continuous Quality Improvement


Affiliations
1 Professor, Department of CSE, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Tirupati, India
2 Associate Professor, Department of CSE, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Tirupati, India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Measurement of educational system/outcomes is a very complex, tedious and rigorous process. Immeasurable educational system/outcomes, means that the educational system is not properly understood or that the measurement system is not properly defined or benchmark measurement techniques are not yet developed. If educational system and its outcomes are not properly measured, then the educational system in itself is not properly understood, the goals of educational system are vaguely set and there is no process of review and refinement of quality of educational system. The intangibles of educational system must be clearly understood, well-defined and crisply measured to achieve the goals of outcome-based education and redirect the future of educational system. Measuring scholarship of knowledge in students and academic success of institutions is the key to deliver potentially skilled graduates to the society and the nation. Measurement of outcomes of education provides reliable insights for understanding the impact of education on stakeholders. This paper presents a model for measuring outcomes attainments for one-to-many model course outcome-program outcome mapping and also presents a sample of how to use assessment result s for continuous quality improvement.

Keywords

Outcome Based Education, Continuous Quality Improvement, Outcomes Assessment, Program Assessment and Evaluation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • ABET Accreditation, https://www.abet.org/accreditation/, retrieved Oct 2019.
  • Admuthe, L.S., Loni, D.Y. (2016) Course Outcome-Program Outcome Mapping Matrix & Attainment-Issues and Model Based Solutions for Tier II Category, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations.
  • AICTE Recommendations for Examination Reforms (2018), https://www.aicteindia.org/sites/default/files/ExaminationReform s.pdf , retrieved Jul 2019.
  • Allen, M. J. (2004), Assessing Academic Programs in Higher Education. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company.
  • Carelli, J. (2019) Seeking ABET Accreditation: A Case Study in Outcome Assessment. In Proceedings of International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering, 81-87.
  • Contreras, E. (2004), Evaluation of University Learning, University Teaching, Orientations for Teacher Training, ICE, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, 129-152.
  • Evans, C. (2013), Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education, Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120.
  • Harmanani, H.M. (2017) An outcome-based assessment process for accrediting computing programmes, European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 844-859.
  • Huba, M. E., and Freed J. E. (2000), Learnercentered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning, Allyn & Bacon, 160 Gould St., Needham Heights, MA 02494.
  • Jadhav, M.R., Kakade, A.B., Jagtap, S.R. and Patil, M.S., (2020) Impact assessment of outcome based approach in engineering education in India, Procedia Computer Science, 172, 791-796.
  • Kulkarni, V.A., Ahuja, B.B. and Dhanvijay, M.R. (2017) CO-PO Mapping and Attainment Booklet for Tier-II Students with Rubrics Assessment, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(3), 28-34.
  • NBA SAR National Board of Accreditation Self Assessment Report for Engineering Undergraduate Program, Jan 2016, https://www.nbaind.org/Downloads/Documents, retrieved Oct 2019.
  • Rajak, A., Shrivastava, A.K., Shrivastava, D.P. (2018) Automating Outcome Based Education for the Attainment of Course and Program Outcomes, In 2018 Fifth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT) 373-376, IEEE.
  • Subbaraman, S., Dharmadhikari, V.B. and Patil, B.G. (2016) Computing Attainment of Program Outcomes by Associating Credit Based Weight Factor of the Components of Curriculum, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations.
  • Sudheer, K., V. V. N. Sujit, N. V. G. Prasad, and K. Ravichand. (2016) A Novel Method of Learning Outcome Assessment in Outcome Based Education, In 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), 328-331, IEEE.

Abstract Views: 3

PDF Views: 0




  • Program Assessment and Evaluation for Continuous Quality Improvement

Abstract Views: 3  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Gurram Sunitha
Professor, Department of CSE, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Tirupati, India
J. Avanija
Associate Professor, Department of CSE, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Tirupati, India

Abstract


Measurement of educational system/outcomes is a very complex, tedious and rigorous process. Immeasurable educational system/outcomes, means that the educational system is not properly understood or that the measurement system is not properly defined or benchmark measurement techniques are not yet developed. If educational system and its outcomes are not properly measured, then the educational system in itself is not properly understood, the goals of educational system are vaguely set and there is no process of review and refinement of quality of educational system. The intangibles of educational system must be clearly understood, well-defined and crisply measured to achieve the goals of outcome-based education and redirect the future of educational system. Measuring scholarship of knowledge in students and academic success of institutions is the key to deliver potentially skilled graduates to the society and the nation. Measurement of outcomes of education provides reliable insights for understanding the impact of education on stakeholders. This paper presents a model for measuring outcomes attainments for one-to-many model course outcome-program outcome mapping and also presents a sample of how to use assessment result s for continuous quality improvement.

Keywords


Outcome Based Education, Continuous Quality Improvement, Outcomes Assessment, Program Assessment and Evaluation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2021%2Fv34i3%2F150016