Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Gupta, R. P.
- Field Efficacy of New Generation Insecticides for the Management of Spotted Pod Borer, Maruca vitrata(Fab.) in Cowpea
Abstract Views :431 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Entomology, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda (U.P.), IN
2 National Horticultural Research and Development Foundation, Nasik (M.S.), IN
1 Department of Entomology, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda (U.P.), IN
2 National Horticultural Research and Development Foundation, Nasik (M.S.), IN
Source
International Journal of Plant Protection, Vol 13, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 36-39Abstract
The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata(Fab.) causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the field efficacy of new generation insecticides against spotted pod borer. Field experiments were conducted at Regional Research Station, Nasik (Maharashtra) on cowpea during Kharif,2009 and 2010. Among the new generations tested, flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (4.79%) was observed significantly higher, in reducing the damage caused by the spotted pod borer in cowpea, on number basis followed by indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 0.5 ml/l (7.99%) and spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (8.70%). The highest marketable yield (91.49 q/ha) was recorded in flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l followed by spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (91.39 q/ha). However, the maximum cost benefit ratio (1:3.2) was recorded in thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/l followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/l (1:2.3), spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (1:1.9), emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.5 g/l (1:1.3), flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (1:1.1). On the basis of efficacy, flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l was observed to be very effective against Maruca vitratain cowpea followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/l and spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l.Keywords
Cowpea, New Generation Insecticides, Management,Maruca vitrata.
References
- Ahlawat, I.P.S. and Shiva Kumar, B.G. (2005). Kharifpulses. In Textbook of Field Crops production. Dr. R. Prasad (Ed.) Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
- Ashok Kumar, C.T. and Shivaraju, C. (2009). Evaluation of newer insecticide molecules against pod borer of black gram. Karnataka J.Agric. Sci., 22:521-523
- Grigolli, J., Lourenção, A. and Ávila, C. (2015).Field efficacy of chemical pesticides against Maruca vitrataFabricius (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) infesting soybean in Brazil. American J. Plant Sci., 6: 537-544.
- Jackai, L.E.N. and Daoust, R.A. (1986).Insect pests of cowpeas. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 3 : 195 -119.
- Jackai, L.E.N. (1985). Cowpea entomology research at IITA and its impact on food production in the tropics. Nigeria J. Ent., 6 : 87-97.
- Jackai, L.E.N. (1993).The use of neem in controlling cowpea pests. IITA Research No., 7:5-11
- Mallikarjuna, J. (2009).Studies on pod borers of dolichos bean, Lablab purpureusL. (Sweet) and their management. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India
- Pandey, S.N., Singh, R., Sharma, V.K. and Kanwat, P.W. (1991).Losses due to insect pests in some Kharifpulses. Indian J. Ent., 53 : 629-631.
- Patel, P.S., Patel, I.S., Panickar, B. and Ravindrababu, Y. (2012). Management of spotted pod borer, Maruca vitratain cowpea through newer insecticides. Trend Biosciences, 5(2) : 149-151.
- Rajput, S.K. and Rana, D.S. (2016).Crop diversification with vegetable cowpea for improving productivity, resource use efficiency, soil and human health. Indian Farming, 66 (1): 5-9.
- Singh, V. and Singh, B. (1992).Tropical grain legume as important human foods. Economic Botany, 1646 : 310-321.
- Suh, J.B., Jackai, L.E.N. and Hammond, W.N.O. (1986). Observations on pod sucking bug populations on cowpea at Mokwa, Nigeria. Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin, 33: 17-19.
- Swamy, S.V. S.G., Ramana, M.V. and Krishna, Y.R. (2010). Efficacy of insecticides against the spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer), in black gram [ Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] grown in rice fallow. Pest Mgmt. & Economic Zool., 18(1/2) : 157-164.