Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Bio-Efficacy of New Molecules against Sucking Pests in Summer Cowpea


Affiliations
1 Department of Entomology, Junagadh Agriculture University, Junagadh (Gujarat), India
2 Millet Research Station (J.A.U.), Jamnagar (Gujarat), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Investigations was conducted to evaluate bio-efficacy of some new molecules of insecticides against major sucking pests of summer cowpea at Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during summer 2016 with ten treatments and three replications. Among the tested insecticides, dinotefuran 0.006 per cent, acetamiprid 0.004 per cent and dimethoate 0.03 per cent were found most effective against jassids. The treatments of acetamiprid 0.004 per cent, dimethoate 0.03 per cent and spiromesifen 0.08 per cent were found most effective in reducing the whitefly population. The application of dinotefuran 0.006 per cent acetamiprid 0.004 per cent and dimethoate 0.03 per cent proved effective in recording minimum aphid population. The highest grain yield of cowpea 853 kg/ ha was recorded from the treatment of dinetofuran 0.006 per cent which was statistically at par with acetamiprid 0.004 per cent (816 kg/ha), spiromesifen 0.08 per cent (795 kg/ha), dimethoate 0.03 per cent (790 kg/ha) and flonicamid 0.02 per cent (752 kg/ha). On the basis of economics, acetamiprid 0.004 per cent (1: 21.8) proved to be most economically viable treatment followed by dimethoate 0.03 per cent (1:21.2), spiromesifen 0.08 per cent (1:9.8), dinetofuran 0.006 per cent (1:9.4), chlorfenapyr 0.0075 per cent (1:5.8), clothianidin 0.003 per cent (1:5.5) and flonicamid 0.02 per cent (1:4.8).

Keywords

Cowpea, Bioefficacy, Sucking Pests, Dinotefuran, Flonicamid.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anonymous (2014). Mission for integrated development of horticulture, NEW DELHI, INDIA.
  • Atwal, A.S. (1976). Agricultural pests of India and South East Asia. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, pp. 207-272.
  • Bharpoda, T.M., Patel, N.B., Thumar, R.K., Bhatt, N.A., Ghetiya, L.V., Patel, H.C. and Borad, P. K. (2014).Evaluation of insecticides against sucking insect pests infesting Bt cotton BG-2. Bioscan, 9 (3) : 977-980.
  • Gaurkhede, A.S., Bhalkare, S.K., Sadawarte, A.K. and Undirwade, D. B. (2015). Bio efficacy of new chemistry molecules against sucking pest of Bt transgenic cotton. Internat. J. Plant Protec., 8 (1): 7-12.
  • Gowtham, V., Dilipsundar, N., Balaji, K. and Karthikeyan, S. (2016). Study on the effectiveness of pesticides against cowpea aphid. Internat. J. Plant Protec., 9 (1) :146-149.
  • Kotadia, V.S. and Bhalani, P. A. (1992). Residual toxicity of some insecticides against Aphis craccivora Koch on cowpea crop.GAU Res. J.,17(2): 161-164.
  • Mahalakshmi, M. S., Sreekanth, M., Adinarayana, M. and Rao, Y. K. (2015). Efficacy of some novel insecticide molecules against incidence of whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci Genn.) and occurrence of yellow mosaic virus (YMV) disease in urdbean. Internat. J. Pure App. Biosci., 3(5): 101-106.
  • Parmar, S. G., Naik, M. M., Pandya, H. V., Rathod, N. K., Patel, S. D., Dave, P. P. and Saiyad, M. M. (2015). Bio-efficacy of some insecticides against pest complex of black gram.Internat. J. Plant Protec., 8(1): 162-168.
  • Ranjeet, K., Rita, S. and Leena, S. (2015). Bio-efficacy of synthetic insecticides against white fly (Bemisia tabaci) infesting Bt cotton. Res. J. Recent. Sci., 4: 1-2.
  • Roshan, L. and Babu, L. J. (2015). Bio-efficacy of insecticides and biorationals against the incidence of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) and yellow mosaic virus in mungbean.African J. Agric. Res., 10 (10): 1050-1056.
  • Sharma, H. C. and Franzmann, B. A. (2000). Biology of the legume pod borer, Marucavitrata and its damage to pigeonpea and adzuki bean. Internat. J. Tro. Ins. Sci., 20 (2) : 99-108.
  • Shreevani, G. N., Sreenivas, A. G.,Bheemanna, M. and Hosamani, A. C. (2012). Toxicity studies of neonicotinyls against sucking pests on Bt cotton. Karnataka J.Agric. Sci., 25 (4) : 540-542.
  • Singh, S.R. and Van Emden, H. F. (1976). Insect pests of grain legumes, Ann. Revi. Entomol., 24: 255-278.
  • Sinha, S.R., Singh, R. and Sharma, R.K. (2007). Management of insect pests of okra through insecticides and intercropping. Ann. Plant Protec. Sci., 15: 321-324.
  • Swaminathan, M. S. (2007). Natural resources management for an evergreen revolution.The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture, pp-20.

Abstract Views: 237

PDF Views: 0




  • Bio-Efficacy of New Molecules against Sucking Pests in Summer Cowpea

Abstract Views: 237  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

T. Anandmurthy
Department of Entomology, Junagadh Agriculture University, Junagadh (Gujarat), India
G. M. Parmar
Millet Research Station (J.A.U.), Jamnagar (Gujarat), India
G. Arvindarajan
Department of Entomology, Junagadh Agriculture University, Junagadh (Gujarat), India

Abstract


Investigations was conducted to evaluate bio-efficacy of some new molecules of insecticides against major sucking pests of summer cowpea at Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during summer 2016 with ten treatments and three replications. Among the tested insecticides, dinotefuran 0.006 per cent, acetamiprid 0.004 per cent and dimethoate 0.03 per cent were found most effective against jassids. The treatments of acetamiprid 0.004 per cent, dimethoate 0.03 per cent and spiromesifen 0.08 per cent were found most effective in reducing the whitefly population. The application of dinotefuran 0.006 per cent acetamiprid 0.004 per cent and dimethoate 0.03 per cent proved effective in recording minimum aphid population. The highest grain yield of cowpea 853 kg/ ha was recorded from the treatment of dinetofuran 0.006 per cent which was statistically at par with acetamiprid 0.004 per cent (816 kg/ha), spiromesifen 0.08 per cent (795 kg/ha), dimethoate 0.03 per cent (790 kg/ha) and flonicamid 0.02 per cent (752 kg/ha). On the basis of economics, acetamiprid 0.004 per cent (1: 21.8) proved to be most economically viable treatment followed by dimethoate 0.03 per cent (1:21.2), spiromesifen 0.08 per cent (1:9.8), dinetofuran 0.006 per cent (1:9.4), chlorfenapyr 0.0075 per cent (1:5.8), clothianidin 0.003 per cent (1:5.5) and flonicamid 0.02 per cent (1:4.8).

Keywords


Cowpea, Bioefficacy, Sucking Pests, Dinotefuran, Flonicamid.

References