International Journal of Plant Protection

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Variability in Sensitivity among Different Host Origin-Macrophomina phaseolina Isolates to Azoxystrobin Fungicide


Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Pathology, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur (Bihar), India
2 Pulses Research Center, Mokama (Bihar), India
3 Jute Research Station, Katihar (Bihar), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The charcoal rot fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina, was isolated from chickpea, pigeonpea, groundnut and jute ischolar_main tissues collected from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. Variability in isolates was recognized i.e. feathery growth for pigeonpea and jute isolates, and restricted growth for chickpea and soybean isolates. The sensitivity of M. phaseolina from the four hosts was tested for azoxystrobin, a respiration inhibitor (QoI group) fungicide. The minimum inhibitory concentration was lower (10 ppm) for isolates with restricted growth and higher (between 100 and 150 ppm) for isolates with feathery growth. Concentrations of this fungicide pose significant impact (P < 0.01) on time requirement for growth of isolate. We found strong effectiveness of azoxystrobin to inhibit the growth of slow-growing population of M. phaseolina. Moreover, this fungicide can also exploit for the fast-growing population of M. phaseolina but more time will be required, to act on such isolates, for better result of azoxystrobin. Our results indicate that the response of different isolates varied to concentrations of azoxystrobin; this could be interpreted that the fungicidal application may be performed only after the quantitative estimation of the prevailing population type in the field as because various populations of M. phaseolina may be available in an area. Therefore, our results advocate for judicious use of fungicide (azoxystrobin) application, which ultimate restrict the hazardous impact on soil health.

Keywords

Azoxystrobin, Charcoal Rot, Fungicide, Macrophomina phaseolina.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Almeida, A.M.R. (2001).Macrophomina phaseolina em soja: Sistemas de semeadura, sobrevivência em restos de cultura e diversidade genética. Londrina: Embrapa Soja.

  • Everett, K.R., Owen, S.G. and Cutting, J.G.M. (2005). Testing efficacy of fungicides against post harvest pathogens of avocado (Persea americana cv. Hass). New Zealand J. Plant Prot., 58: 89-95.

  • Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. NEW YORK, U.S.A.

  • Gupta, R.N., Kushwaha, C. and Ghatak, A. (2014). Pre-requisite exploration of Macrophomina phaseolina populace is obligatory prior to fungicide application. National Seminar on Indian Agriculture and Rural Development in Changing Global Scenario, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P.) India. Souvenir NSKVKBHU, 196 : 77.

  • Harrison, S. and Tedford, E. (2002). Quadris, a novel fungicide for disease control in rice. In: Proceeding of the temperate rice conference, B. IRRI, India. pp. 289-294.

  • Hsiang, T., Cooks, S. and Zhao, Y. (2004). Studies on biology and control of daylily rust in Canada. Daylily J., 59: 47-57.

  • Iqbal, U. and Mukhtar, T. (2014). Morphological and pathogenic variability among Macrophomina phaseolina isolates associated with mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] from Pakistan. Sci. World J., doi: 10.1155/2014/950175.

  • Kaur, S., Dhillon, G.S., Brar, S.K., Vallad, G.E., Chand, R. and Chauhan, V.B. (2012). Emerging phytopathogen Macrophomina phaseolina: biology, economic importance and current diagnostic trends. Critical Rev. in Microbiol., 1-16. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2011.640977.

  • Kushwaha, C., Rani, N. and Bhagat, A.P. (2017). Nature, dissemination and epidemiological consequences in charcoal rot pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina. In: The Phytopathogen: Evolution and Adaptation. Eds: Ghatak, A., and Ansar, M. Apple Academic Press, USA. ISBN – 13:978-1-315-36613-5.

  • Mayek-Perez, N., Lopez-Castaneda, C., Gonzalez-Chavira, M., Garch-Espinosa, R., Acosta-Gallegos, J., De la Vega, O.M., and Simpson, J. (2001). Variability of mexican isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina based on pathogenesis and AFLP genotype. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 59: 257-264.

  • Pearson, C.A.S., Schwenk, F.W., Crowe, F.J. and Kelley, K. (1984). Colonization of soybean ischolar_mains by Macrophomina phaseolina. Plant Dis., 68(12): 1086-1088.

  • Reuveni, M. and Sheglov, D. (2002). Effect of azoxystrobin, polyoxin B (polar) and trioxystrobin on germination and growth of Alternaria alternata and decay in red delicious apple fruit. Crop Prot., 21: 951-955.

  • Reuveni, R., Nachmias, A. and Krikun, J. (1983). The role of seed borne inoculum on the development of Macrophomina phaseolina on melon. Plant Dis., 67: 280-281.

  • Saleh, A.A., Ahmed, H.U., Todd, T.C., Travers, S.E., Zeller, K.A., Leslie, J.F. and Garrett, K.A. (2010). Related nest of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates from tall grass prairie, maize, soybean and sorghum. Mol. Ecol., 19(1): 79-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04433.x.

  • Savary, S., Nelson, A., Sparks, A.H., Willocquet, L., Duveiller, E., Mahuku, G., Forbes, G., Garrett, K.A., Hodson, D., Padgham, J., Pande, S., Sharma, M., Yuen, J. and Djurle, A. (2011). International agricultural research tackling the effects of global and climate changes on plant diseases in the developing world. Plant Dis., 95(10): 1204-1216.

  • Singh, S.K., Nene, Y.L. and Reddy, M.V. (1990). Influence of cropping system on Macrophomina phaseolina population in soil. Plant Dis., 74: 812-814.

  • Su, G., Suh, S.O., Schneider, R.W. and Russin, J.S. (2001). Host specialization in the charcoal rot fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina. Phytopathology 91: 120-126.

  • Sundravadana, S., Alice, D., Kuttalam, S. and Samiyappan, R. (2007). Efficacy of azoxystrobin on Colletotrichum gloeosporiodes Penz. growth and on controlling mango anthracnose. J. Agril. Biol. Sci., 2(3): 10-15.

  • Topps, J.H. and Wain, R.L. (1957). Investigation of fungicides. III. The fungitoxicity crop science 12: 847-850 of 3 and 5 alkyl salicglanlilide and para choloro anilines. Ann. Appl. Biol., 45: 506-511.

  • Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Li, D., Huang J., Wei W., Lv, H. and Zhang, X. (2011). Variations in the isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina from sesame in China based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and pathogenicity. African J. Microbiol. Res., 5(31): 5584-5590.


Abstract Views: 214

PDF Views: 1




  • Variability in Sensitivity among Different Host Origin-Macrophomina phaseolina Isolates to Azoxystrobin Fungicide

Abstract Views: 214  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Abhijeet Ghatak
Department of Plant Pathology, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur (Bihar), India
Chanda Kushwaha
Department of Plant Pathology, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur (Bihar), India
Ramesh Nath Gupta
Pulses Research Center, Mokama (Bihar), India
Kunal Pratap Singh
Jute Research Station, Katihar (Bihar), India
Mohammad Ansar
Department of Plant Pathology, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur (Bihar), India

Abstract


The charcoal rot fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina, was isolated from chickpea, pigeonpea, groundnut and jute ischolar_main tissues collected from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. Variability in isolates was recognized i.e. feathery growth for pigeonpea and jute isolates, and restricted growth for chickpea and soybean isolates. The sensitivity of M. phaseolina from the four hosts was tested for azoxystrobin, a respiration inhibitor (QoI group) fungicide. The minimum inhibitory concentration was lower (10 ppm) for isolates with restricted growth and higher (between 100 and 150 ppm) for isolates with feathery growth. Concentrations of this fungicide pose significant impact (P < 0.01) on time requirement for growth of isolate. We found strong effectiveness of azoxystrobin to inhibit the growth of slow-growing population of M. phaseolina. Moreover, this fungicide can also exploit for the fast-growing population of M. phaseolina but more time will be required, to act on such isolates, for better result of azoxystrobin. Our results indicate that the response of different isolates varied to concentrations of azoxystrobin; this could be interpreted that the fungicidal application may be performed only after the quantitative estimation of the prevailing population type in the field as because various populations of M. phaseolina may be available in an area. Therefore, our results advocate for judicious use of fungicide (azoxystrobin) application, which ultimate restrict the hazardous impact on soil health.

Keywords


Azoxystrobin, Charcoal Rot, Fungicide, Macrophomina phaseolina.

References