Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Studies on the Assessment of Major Nutrients and Microbial Population of Termite Mound Soil


Affiliations
1 Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam (T. N.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Assessment of major nutrients of open and closed type of termite mound soil showed that available nitrogen and phosphorus were comparatively higher both in the surface and sub-surface layer than normal soil. Bacterial population was high in the sub-surface soil collected from closed termite mound (75.5 × 105 cfu/g of soil) and open termite mound (65.5 × 105 cfu/g of soil) compared to the normal soil (30.5 × 105 cfu/g of soil). Likewise, Actinomycetes population was also observed to be high in the sub-surface soil of both open and closed type of termite mounds.

Keywords

Termite Mound, Soil Nutrients, Bacteria, Fungi, Actinomycetes.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ackerman, I.L., Teixera, W.G., Riha, S.J., Lehmann, J. and Fernandes, E.C.M. (2007). The impact of mound-building termites on surface soil properties in a secondary forest of Central Amazonia. Appl.Soil Ecol., 37: 267–276.
  • Batjes, N.H. (1996). Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European J. Soil Sci., 47 (2): 151-163.
  • Bignell, D.E. and Eggleton, P. (2000). Termites in ecosystems. In: Termites: evolution, sociality, symbiosis, ecology. Abe, T., Bignell, D.E. and Higashi, M. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA. pp. 363–387.
  • Classen, A.T., Overby, S.T., Hart, S.C. and Koch, G.W. (2007). Season mediates herbivore effects on litter and soil microbial abundance and activity in a semi-arid woodland. Plant & Soil, 295 (1) : 217–227.
  • Dhembare, A.J. (2013). Physico-chemical properties of termite mound soil. Archiv. Appl. Sci. Res., 5 (6) : 123–126.
  • Eggleton, P. (2000). Global patterns of termite diversity. In: Termites: evolution, sociality, symbiosis, ecology. Abe, T., Bignell, D.E. and Higashi, M. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA. pp. 25–51.
  • Emerson, A.E. (1956). Geographical origins and dispersions of termite genera. Fieldiana Zool., 37: 465-521.
  • Howse, P.E. (1970). Termite: A study in social behaviour. Rentokil Ltd. West Sussex, U. K. No: 25-29, 163–176.
  • Jankowski. S.J. and Freiser, H. (1961). Flame photometric methods of determining the potassium tetraphenylborate. Anal. Chem., 33 (6): 773–775.
  • Jouquet, P., Mamou, L., Lepage, M. and Velde, B. (2002). Effect of termites on clay minerals in tropical soils: fungus-growing termites as weathering agents. European J. Soil Sci., 53 (4): 521–528.
  • Jouquet, P., Barre, P., Lepage, M. and Velde, B. (2005). Impact of subterranean fungus-growing termites (Isoptera, Macrotermitiane) on chosen soil properties in a West African savanna. Biology &Fertility of Soils, 41(5): 365-370.
  • Jouquet, P., Traore, S., Choosai, C., Hartmann, C. and Bignell, D. (2011). Influence of termites on ecosystem functioning. Ecosystem services provided by termites. European J. Soil Biology, 47(4): 215-222.
  • Lobry, de Bruyn and Conacher (1990). Soil modification by termites in the Central wheat-belt of Western-Australia. Australian J. Soil Res., 33 (1): 179–193.
  • Noirot, C. (1969). Glands and secretions. In:Biology of termites, Krishna, K. and Weesner, F.M. (eds.), Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York. pp. 200- 220.
  • Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Wantanable, F.S. and Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with Sodium bicarbonate. United State Dept. of Agric. CIRC., Washinton, D.C., 1954, 939.
  • Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1985). Statistical methods for agricultural workers (IInd Ed.), Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
  • Parkinson, D., Gray, T.R.G. and Williams, S.T. (1971). Ecology of soil micro-organisms. Blackwell, Oxford, 116 p.
  • Subbaiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Curr. Sci., 25: 259.
  • Su, N.Y. and Scheffrahn, R.H. (2000). Termites as pests of buildings. In: Termites: evolution, sociality, symbioses, ecology, Abe, T., Bignell, D.E. and Higashi, M. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. pp. 437–453.
  • Wood, T.G. and Johnson, R.A. (1986). The biology, physiology, and ecology of termites. In: Economic impact and control of social insects, Vinson, S.B. (ed.), Praeger Publications, New York. pp. 1-68.

Abstract Views: 183

PDF Views: 0




  • Studies on the Assessment of Major Nutrients and Microbial Population of Termite Mound Soil

Abstract Views: 183  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

P. Pretheep Kumar
Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam (T. N.), India
M. Tilak
Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam (T. N.), India
K. Sivakumar
Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam (T. N.), India
K. Saranya
Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam (T. N.), India

Abstract


Assessment of major nutrients of open and closed type of termite mound soil showed that available nitrogen and phosphorus were comparatively higher both in the surface and sub-surface layer than normal soil. Bacterial population was high in the sub-surface soil collected from closed termite mound (75.5 × 105 cfu/g of soil) and open termite mound (65.5 × 105 cfu/g of soil) compared to the normal soil (30.5 × 105 cfu/g of soil). Likewise, Actinomycetes population was also observed to be high in the sub-surface soil of both open and closed type of termite mounds.

Keywords


Termite Mound, Soil Nutrients, Bacteria, Fungi, Actinomycetes.

References