International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Row Orientation on Radiation Interception and Growth Dynamics of Wheat


Affiliations
1 School of Climate Change and Agricultural Meteorology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The field experiments were conducted at Research Farm, School of Climate Change and Agricultural Meteorology during 2012-13 and 2013-14. This study was planned to know importance of row orientation in radiation interception and growth dynamics of wheat crop. Three wheat varieties viz., HD 2967, PBW 550 and PBW 343 were sown under two row orientation i.e. North-South (N-S) and East-West (E-W) on 25th November during both crop seasons. PAR interception, dry matter accumulation and leaf area index were recorded at periodic intervals during both crop seasons. The PAR interception was more in east-west row orientation as compared to north-south row orientation in all the three varieties. Among different varieties, HD 2967 intercepted maximum photosynthetically active radiation due to highest leaf area index of crop. Relationships were developed between PAR interception and dry matter accumulation and leaf area index. Highly significant co-efficient of determination (R2) were found and these R2-values indicated that PAR interception significantly influence dry matter accumulation as well as leaf area index of crop.

Keywords

Row Orientation, PAR Interception, Leaf Area Index, Dry Matter Accumulation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abbate, P. E., Dardanelli, J. L., Cantareo, M. G., Maturano, M., Mecion, R. J. M. and Suero, E. E. (2004). Climatic and water availability effects on water use efficiency in wheat. Crop Sci., 44 (2): 474-483.

  • Anonymous (2014). Department of Agriculture, Punjab. CHANDIGARH, INDIA.

  • Biscoe, P. V. and Gallagher, J.N. (1978).Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. J. Agric. Sci., 91(01):47-60ยท DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600056616

  • Calderini, D.F., Dreccer, M.F. and Slafer, G. A. (1997). Consequences of breeding on biomass, radiation interception and radiation use efficiency in wheat. Field Crop Res., 52: 271-281.

  • Chen, C. and Neill, K. (2006). Response of spring wheat yield and protein to row spacing, plant density and nitrogen application in central Montana. Fertilizer Fact: No. 37. Montana State University, Agricultural Experiment Station and Extension Service.

  • El-Maksoud Abd, M. F. (2008). Effect of row orientation and plant arrangement on growth, yield and yield componenets of two maize cultivaes. J. Appl. Sci. Res., 4 : 1182-1190.

  • Fang, Q.X., Chen, Y.H., Li, Q.Q., Yu, S.Z., Luo, Y., Yu, Q. and Ouyang Z. (2006). Effects of soil moisture on radiation utilization during late growth stages and water use efficiency of winter wheat. Acta. Agron. Sin., 32: 861-866.

  • Gallagher, J. N. and Biscoe, P. V. (1978). A physiological analysis of cereal yield and partitioning of dry matter. Agric. Prog., 53: 51-70.

  • Gifford, R.M., Thorne, J.H., Witz, W.D. and Giaquinta, R.T. (1984). Crop productivity and photoassimilate partitioning. Science, 225: 801-808.

  • Hundal, S. S., Kaur, P. and Malikpuri, S. D. S. (2003). Agroclimatic models for prediction of growth and yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 73 (3): 142-44.

  • Hussain, A., Wajid, A., Maqsood, M., Ahmad, A. and Rafiq, M. (2002). Effect of drought on wheat yield and radiation use efficiency. In: Proc. Nat. Symp. On Drought and Water Resources in Pakistan, pp: 75-80. March 18, 2002, Lahore Pakistan.

  • Jha, Somnath, Sehgal, V.K. and Subbarao, Y. V. (2012). Effect of direction of sowing and crop phenotype on radiation interception, use efficiency, growth and productivity of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) J. Agric. Phy. 12 : 37-43.

  • Joshi, A. K., Mishra, B., Chatrath, R., Ortiz Ferrara, G. and Singh, R. P. (2007). Wheat improvement in India: Present status, emerging challenges and future prospects. Euphytica, 157 (3): 457-64.

  • Kanton, R. A. L. and Dennett, M. D. (2004).Water uptake and use by morphologically contrasting maize/pea cultivars in sole and intercrops in temperate conditions. Experimental. Agric., 40 : 201-14.

  • Lunagaria, M. M. and Shekh, A.M. (2006). Radiation interception, light extinction co-efficient and leaf area index of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop as influenced by row orientation and row spacing. J. Agric. Sci., 2 : 43-54.

  • Maddoni, G.A. and Otegui Maria, E. (1996). Leaf area, light interception and crop development in maize. Field Crop Res., 48 : 81-87.

  • Milford, G.F.J., Biscoe, P.V., Jaggard, K.W., Scott, R.K. and Draycott, A.P. (1980). Physiological potential for increasing yields of sugar beet. In: R.G. Hurd, P.V. Biscoe and C. Dennis (eds.). Opportunities for increasing crop yields, pp: 71-83. London: Pitman.

  • Monteith, J.L. (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, Series, B 281 : 277-294.

  • Monteith, J.L. (1981). Does light limit crop production. In: C.B. Johnson (ed.). Physiological processes limiting plant productivity butterworths, pp: 23-38. London.

  • Nagarajan, S. (2005). Can India produce enough wheat even by 2020. Curr. Sci., 89 : 1467-1471.

  • Otegui Maria, E. and Bonhomme, Raymond (1998). Grain yield components in maize: I. Ear growth and kernel set. Field Crop Res., 56 : 246-257.

  • Pandey, V., Chaudhari, G. B., Patel, H. R., Vadodaria, R. P., Bhatt, B.K. and Shekh, A. M. (2004). Radiation interception and light use efficiency in wheat crop. J. Agromet., 6 : 43-46.

  • Perry, M.L. and Swaminathan, M. S. (1992). Climate change on food production. Mintzer (ed) Confronting climate change-risk, implications and responses. pp. 113-125. Cambridge University Press .

  • Plenet, D., Mollier, A. and Pellerin, S. (2000). Growth analysis of maize field crops under phosphorus deficiency.II. Radiation-use efficiency, biomass accumulation and yield components. Plant Soil, 224 : 259-272.

  • Ram, H., Buttar, G. S., Bhagat, I., Sharma, I., Mavi, G. S. and Jindal, M. M. (2013). Influence of varieties and seeding rates on growth, productivity, disease reaction and economics of wheat in Northwest India. J. Agric. Sci., 8 : 122-135.

  • Reddy, S. R. (2006). Agronomy of field crops. pp. 143-88. Kalyani Publishers.

  • Singer, J.W., Meek, D.W., Sauer, T. J., Prueger, J. H. and Hatfield, J.L. ( 2011). Variability of light interception and radiation use efficiency in maize and soybean. Field Crop Res., 121: 147-152.

  • Wajid, A., Hussain, A., Ahmad, A., Rafiq, M., Goheer, A. R. and Ibrahim, M. (2004). Effect of sowing date and plant density on growth, light interception and yield of wheat under semi-arid conditions. Internat. J. Agric. & Biol., 6: 1119-1123.


Abstract Views: 192

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Row Orientation on Radiation Interception and Growth Dynamics of Wheat

Abstract Views: 192  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sarabjot Kaur Sandhu
School of Climate Change and Agricultural Meteorology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), India
L. K. Dhaliwal
School of Climate Change and Agricultural Meteorology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), India

Abstract


The field experiments were conducted at Research Farm, School of Climate Change and Agricultural Meteorology during 2012-13 and 2013-14. This study was planned to know importance of row orientation in radiation interception and growth dynamics of wheat crop. Three wheat varieties viz., HD 2967, PBW 550 and PBW 343 were sown under two row orientation i.e. North-South (N-S) and East-West (E-W) on 25th November during both crop seasons. PAR interception, dry matter accumulation and leaf area index were recorded at periodic intervals during both crop seasons. The PAR interception was more in east-west row orientation as compared to north-south row orientation in all the three varieties. Among different varieties, HD 2967 intercepted maximum photosynthetically active radiation due to highest leaf area index of crop. Relationships were developed between PAR interception and dry matter accumulation and leaf area index. Highly significant co-efficient of determination (R2) were found and these R2-values indicated that PAR interception significantly influence dry matter accumulation as well as leaf area index of crop.

Keywords


Row Orientation, PAR Interception, Leaf Area Index, Dry Matter Accumulation.

References