Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Design and Field Performance of Power Operated Paddy Weeder


Affiliations
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.), India
2 Department of Farm Machinery and Power, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Improper weed control methods can cause about 30–35 per cent reduction in crop yield. The power operated paddy weeder was designed and developed for weeding of paddy crops. In Konkan region, paddy is the major crop cultivated under wet land condition. The hand weeding method using labours is widely adopted at present for paddy. It is costly and drudgerious. Manually operated cono weeders are being used in some of the pockets of Konkan. It’s capacity is less (upto 0.12-0.15 ha/day) and its operation is also heavy due to its weight (7.8 kg). Therefore developed power weeder was designed. It was consisted of engine, gear box, propeller shaft, rotor with blade and main frame and float. The reduction gear box (ratio- 32.5:1) was used to reduce the speed to 200 rpm. The two types of rotors were developed viz., L shape blade and hexagonal serrated blade. The serrated blade has resulted into 9.41 per cent higher weeding efficiency than L shape blade. The L shape blade has resulted into 1.02 per cent minimum plant damage than serrated blade. The lowest fuel consumption of power weeder was found with of L shape blade as 0.576 l/h at 40 DAS while the maximum fuel consumption was found on using of serrated blade as 0.68 l/h at 20 DAS. The maximum field capacity was found with L shape blade (0.0266 ha/h) than serrated blade (0.0213 ha/h) at 40DAS which is 30.39 per cent higher.

Keywords

Paddy Weeder, L- Shape Blade, Serrated Blade, Weeding Efficiency, Plant Damage
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anonymous (2015). Director of Agriculture Pune, rice production, rice productivity of India.2014-2015.
  • Basavaraj, Surendrakumar A. and Divaker Durairaj C. (2016). Study of agronomical and soil parameters in paddy field for development of paddy weeder Internat. J. Agric. Sci., 8 (30): 1627-1631.
  • Bernacki, H., Haman, J. and Kanafojski, Cz. (1972). Text book of Agricultural machines, theory and construction. Vol. I, Scientific publication, Central Institute of Scientific,Technical and Economic Information, Warsaw, Poland.pp. 426- 428.
  • Gite, L.P. and Yadav, B.G. (1985). Ergonomic consideration in the design of mechanical weeders. Proceedings on Design Course of Agricultural machines Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, India.
  • Gite, L.P. and Yadav, B.G. (1990). Optimum handle height for a push pull type manually operated dry land weeder, Ergonomics, 33.
  • Kepner, R. A., Bainer, R. and Barger, E. L. (1978). Text book of Principles of farm machinery, 3rd edition, AVI Publication Co., INC., Westport, Connecticut.
  • Khodabakhshi, A., Kalantari, D and Mousavi, S.R. (2013). Effects of design parameters of rotary tillers on unevenness of the bottom of the furrows. Internat. J. Agron. & Plant Production, 4(5):1060-1065.
  • Mott, R. (1985). Machine elements in mechanical design. Merill Publishing Company, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Nag, P.K. and Dutt, P. (1979). Effectives of some simple agricultural weeders with reference to physiological responses. J. Human Ergonomics, 8 :13-21.
  • Nganilwa, Z.M., Makungu, P.J. and Mpanduji, S.M. (2003). Development and Assessment of an Engine Powered Hand Held Weeder in Tanzania. International Conference on Industrial Design Engineering, UDSM, Dares Salam.
  • Ratnaweera, A.C., Rajapakse, N.N., Ranasinghe, C.J., Thennakoon, T.M.S., Kumara, R.S., Balasooriya, C.P. and Bandara, M.A. (2010). Design of power weeder for low land rice cultivation. International conference on sustainable built environment (ICSBE), Kandy, 13- 14, December, 2010. pp. 468475.
  • Sahay, Jagdishwar (2010). Text book of Element of Agricultural Engineering. 4th Edition A. K. Jain standard publications distributors New Delhi. pp 80.
  • Sharma, D.N. and Mukesh, S. (2010). Text book of Farm Machinery Design, Principles and Problems, 2nd Edition. pp 15.
  • Shirsat, N. A., Chavan, S.S., Aware, V.V., Shahare, P.U., Dhande, K.G. and Aware, Seema V. (2016). Cono weeder: An economic hand tool for women labour in paddy field. Agric. Update, 11 (2) : 154-157.
  • Tayade, N.H. (2016). Performance evaluation of Ambika paddy weeder for paddy in farmer’s field. J. Crop & Weed, 12(3): 178-179.

Abstract Views: 10

PDF Views: 0




  • Design and Field Performance of Power Operated Paddy Weeder

Abstract Views: 10  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

P.U. Shahare
Department of Farm Machinery and Power, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.), India
D. G. Jadhav
Department of Farm Machinery and Power, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.), India
V.V. Aware
Department of Farm Machinery and Power, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.), India
N.A. Shirsat
Department of Farm Machinery and Power, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.), India

Abstract


Improper weed control methods can cause about 30–35 per cent reduction in crop yield. The power operated paddy weeder was designed and developed for weeding of paddy crops. In Konkan region, paddy is the major crop cultivated under wet land condition. The hand weeding method using labours is widely adopted at present for paddy. It is costly and drudgerious. Manually operated cono weeders are being used in some of the pockets of Konkan. It’s capacity is less (upto 0.12-0.15 ha/day) and its operation is also heavy due to its weight (7.8 kg). Therefore developed power weeder was designed. It was consisted of engine, gear box, propeller shaft, rotor with blade and main frame and float. The reduction gear box (ratio- 32.5:1) was used to reduce the speed to 200 rpm. The two types of rotors were developed viz., L shape blade and hexagonal serrated blade. The serrated blade has resulted into 9.41 per cent higher weeding efficiency than L shape blade. The L shape blade has resulted into 1.02 per cent minimum plant damage than serrated blade. The lowest fuel consumption of power weeder was found with of L shape blade as 0.576 l/h at 40 DAS while the maximum fuel consumption was found on using of serrated blade as 0.68 l/h at 20 DAS. The maximum field capacity was found with L shape blade (0.0266 ha/h) than serrated blade (0.0213 ha/h) at 40DAS which is 30.39 per cent higher.

Keywords


Paddy Weeder, L- Shape Blade, Serrated Blade, Weeding Efficiency, Plant Damage

References