International Journal of Agricultural Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Long-Term Geochemical Assessment of Groundwater in a Hardrock Aquifer System


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (W.B.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Groundwater is one of the most vital natural resource supporting the survival of human civilization. Lowering of groundwater levels accompanied by deteriorating groundwater quality worldwide has created a serious concern about sustainability of water supply in the 21st century. Rapid urbanization and unplanned management of day-to-day activities has led to the release of harmful substances to groundwater resources depleting the qualitative aspect of groundwater. In this study, the concentration of 13 groundwater-quality parameters for the confined aquifer of 14 blocks in the study area located in South India were analyzed critically using premonsoon and post-monsoon groundwater-quality data for 34 years. Both statistical and graphical methods were employed to analyze the spatial and temporal variability in the concentration of groundwater-quality parameters. Two groundwater quality diagrams (Piper diagram and Schoeller diagram) were prepared for the geochemical classification of groundwater of the aquifer. Groundwater quality was also analyzed for irrigation suitability. The results indicated statistically significant long-term variation in the concentration of pH, F-, Ca2+, Mg2+ and K+. Also, a majority of the groundwater-quality parameters’ concentration was found to be spatially significant. Piper diagram revealed that groundwater in the study area is mainly of Na-Cl- and Ca-Mg-SO4 2- types with Na+, and Cl- and HCO3 - as dominant cation and anions, respectively. It was found that the concentration of Total Dissolved Solids and Total Hardness in the confined aquifer exceed their maximum permissible limits for drinking water. The US Salinity Laboratory diagram revealed high salinity in the groundwater with low sodium hazard. In terms of magnesium hazard, groundwater of the entire area is unsuitable for irrigation.

Keywords

Groundwater Quality, Geochemical Classification, Spatio-Temporal Variation, Hydrochemical Facies.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahmad, Z. and Qadir, A. (2011). Source evaluation of physicochemically contaminated groundwater of Dera Ismail Khan area, Pakistan. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 175: 9-21.

  • Aksoy, A.O. and Scheytt, T. (2007). Assessment of groundwater pollution around Torbali, Izmir, Turkey.Environmental Geology, 53(1): 19-25.

  • Alley, W.M. (1993). Regional ground-water quality. John Wiley & Sons, New York, U.S.A.

  • Anbazhagan, S. and Nair, A.M. (2004).Geographic information system and groundwater quality mapping in Panvel Basin, Maharashtra, India. Environmental Geology, 45(6): 753-761.

  • Agca, N. (2014). Spatial variability of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and irrigation in the Amik Plain (South Turkey). Environmental Earth Sciences, 72(10): 4115-4130.

  • Arumugham, K. and Elangovan, K. (2009). Hydrochemical characteristics and groundwater quality assessment in Tirupur Region , Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ. Geology, 58: 1509-1520.

  • Ayers, R.S. and Westcot, D.W. (1989). Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29 (Rev. 1), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome, Italy.

  • Babiker, I.S. Mohamed, M.A.A., Terao, H., Kato, K. and Ohta, K. (2004). Assessment of groundwater contamination by nitrate leaching from intensive vegetable cultivation using geographical information system. Environment International, 29 (3): 1009-1017.

  • Bjerg, P.L. and Christensen, T.H. (1992). Spatial and temporal small-scale variation in groundwater quality of a shallow sandy aquifer. J. Hydrology, 131: 133-149.

  • Bozdaç, A. and Göçmez, G. (2013). Evaluation of groundwater quality in the Cihanbeyli basin, Konya, Central Anatolia, Turkey. Environmental Earth Sciences, 69(3): 921-937.

  • CGWB (2008). District groundwater brochure, Tiruchirapalli District, Tamil Nadu. Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, South Eastern Coastal Region, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

  • CGWB (2010). State Profile: Groundwater Scenario of Tamil Nadu. Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

  • Doneen, L.D. (1964). Water quality for agriculture. Department of Irrigation, University of Calfornia, Davis.

  • Eaton, F.M. (1950). Significance of carbonate in irrigation water. Soil Science, 69 (2): 123-133.

  • Ghosh, T. and Kanchan, R. (2014). Geoenvironmental appraisal of groundwater quality in Bengal alluvial tract, India/ : A geochemical and statistical approach. Environmental Earth Science, 72 : 2475-2488.

  • Güler, C., Thyne, G.D., McCray, J.E. and Turner, A.K. (2002). Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeology J., 10 : 455-474.

  • Jassas, H. and Merkel, B. (2015). Assessment of hydrochemical evolution of groundwater and its suitability for drinking and irrigation purposes in Al-Khazir Gomal Basin, Northern Iraq. Environ. Earth Sci., 74(9): 6647-6663.

  • Kumar, M., Kumari, K., Ramanathan, A.L. and Saxena, R. (2007). A comparative evaluation of groundwater suitability for irrigation and drinking purposes in two intensively cultivated districts of Punjab, India. Environmental Geology, 53: 553-574.

  • Liu, C.W., Lin, K.H. and Kuo, Y.M. (2003). Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Science of the Total Environment, 313 : 77-89.

  • Machiwal, D. and Jha, M.K. (2010). Tools and techniques for water quality interpretation. Chapter 9, In: G. Krantzberg, A. Tanik, J.S.A. do Carmo, A. Indarto and A. Ekda (editors), Advances in Water Quality Control, Scientific Research Publishing, USA, pp. 211-251.

  • Madhnure, P. (2016). An integrated hydrogeological study to support sustainable development and management of groundwater resources/ - a case study from the Precambrian Crystalline Province, India. Hydrogeology J., 24: 475-487.

  • Mehta, K.V. (2010). Physico-chemical characteristics and statistical study of groundwater of some places of Vadgam taluka in Banaskantha district of Gujarat state (India). J. Chemical Pharmaceutical Research, 2(4): 663-670.

  • Mondal, N.C., Singh, V.S., Saxena, V.K. and Prasad, R. K. (2008). Improvement of groundwater quality due to fresh water ingress in Potharlanka Island, Krishna delta , India. Environmental Geology, 55: 595-603.

  • Moral, F., Cruz-Sanjulián, J.J. and Olías, M. (2008). Geochemical evolution of groundwater in the carbonate aquifers of Sierra de Segura (Betic Cordillera, southern Spain). J. Hydrology, 360 : 281-296.

  • Nag, S.K. and Suchetana, B. (2016).Groundwater quality and its suitability for irrigation and domestic purposes - a study in Rajnagar Block, Birbhum District, West Bengal, India. J. Earth Science & Climate Change, 7(2). doi:10.4172/21577617.1000337.

  • Nas, B. and Berktay, A. (2010).Groundwater quality mapping in urban groundwater using GIS. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 160: 215-227.

  • Park, S.C., Yun, S.T., Chae, G.T., Yoo, I.S., Shin, K.S., Heo, C.H. and Lee, S.K. (2005). Regional hydrochemical study on salinization of coastal aquifers, western coastal area of South Korea. J. Hydrology, 313: 182-194.

  • Ragunath, H.M. (1987). Groundwater. Wiley Eastern, New Delhi, India.

  • Raju, N.J. (2007). Hydrogeochemical parameters for assessment of groundwater quality in the upper Gunjanaeru River basin, Cuddapah District, Andhra Pradesh, South India. Environmental Geology, 52: 1067-1074.

  • Schoeller, H. (1962). Leseaux Souterraines. Mason and Cie., Paris.

  • Sharma, P., Sarma, H.P. and Mahanta, C. (2012). Evaluation of groundwater quality with emphasis on fluoride concentration in Nalbari district, Assam, Northeast India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 65(7): 2147-2159.

  • Shiklomanov, I.A. (1993). Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World’s Fresh Water Resources. Oxford University Press, New York, U.S.A.

  • Singh, K.P., Malik, A., Mohan, D. and Sinha, S. (2004). Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India): a case study. Water Research, 38: 3980-3992.

  • Sojobi, A.O. (2016). Evaluation of groundwater quality in a rural community in North Central of Nigeria. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 188 (3): 1-17.

  • Stigter, T.Y., van Ooijen, S.P.J., Post, V.E.A., Appelo, C.A.J. and Carvalho Dill, A.M.M. (1998). A hydrogeological and hydrochemical explanation of the groundwater composition under irrigated land in a Mediterranean environment, Algarve, Portugal. J. Hydrology, 208 : 262-279.

  • Subramani, T., Elango, L. and Damodarasamy, S.R. (2005). Groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural use in Chithar River Basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Environmental Geology, 47: 1099-1110.

  • SWS (2014). Manual of Aqua Chem. A Professional Application for Water Quality Data Analysis, Plotting, Reporting and Modeling.

  • Szabolcs, I. and Darab, C. (1964). The Influence of Irrigation Water of High Sodium Carbonate Content of Soils. Proceedings of 8th International Congress of ISSS, 2 : 803-812.

  • Tushaar, S. (2009). Taming the Anarchy: Groundwater Governance in South Asia. Resources for the Future, Washington DC and International Water Management Institute, Colombo.

  • Tyagi, S. K. Datta, P. S. and Pruthi, N. K. (2009). Hydrochemical appraisal of groundwater and its suitability in the intensive agricultural area of Muzaffarnagar district, Uttar Pradesh, India Environ. Geol., 56 : 901–912.

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (1999). Global Environment Outlook 2000, Earthscan, UK.

  • USDA (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and Alkali soils. Handbook No. 60, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

  • USEPA (1996). Guidance for data quality assessment: Practical methods for data analysis. EPAQA/G9, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Office of Research and Development, Washington D.C.

  • Walton, W.C. (1970). Groundwater resources evaluation. McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A.

  • Wilcox, L.V. (1955). Classification and use of irrigation waters. USDA Circular No.969.

  • World Bank (2010). Deep Wells and Prudence: Towards Pragmatic Action for Addressing Groundwater Overexploitation in India. World Bank Report-51676, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

  • Yammani, S. (2007). Groundwater quality suitable zones identification/ : Application of GIS, Chittoor area , Andhra Pradesh , India. Environmental Geology, 53: 201-210.

  • WEBLOGRAPHY

  • http://publications.iwmi.org


Abstract Views: 214

PDF Views: 0




  • Long-Term Geochemical Assessment of Groundwater in a Hardrock Aquifer System

Abstract Views: 214  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Amina Khatun
Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (W.B.), India
Madan Kumar Jha
Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (W.B.), India

Abstract


Groundwater is one of the most vital natural resource supporting the survival of human civilization. Lowering of groundwater levels accompanied by deteriorating groundwater quality worldwide has created a serious concern about sustainability of water supply in the 21st century. Rapid urbanization and unplanned management of day-to-day activities has led to the release of harmful substances to groundwater resources depleting the qualitative aspect of groundwater. In this study, the concentration of 13 groundwater-quality parameters for the confined aquifer of 14 blocks in the study area located in South India were analyzed critically using premonsoon and post-monsoon groundwater-quality data for 34 years. Both statistical and graphical methods were employed to analyze the spatial and temporal variability in the concentration of groundwater-quality parameters. Two groundwater quality diagrams (Piper diagram and Schoeller diagram) were prepared for the geochemical classification of groundwater of the aquifer. Groundwater quality was also analyzed for irrigation suitability. The results indicated statistically significant long-term variation in the concentration of pH, F-, Ca2+, Mg2+ and K+. Also, a majority of the groundwater-quality parameters’ concentration was found to be spatially significant. Piper diagram revealed that groundwater in the study area is mainly of Na-Cl- and Ca-Mg-SO4 2- types with Na+, and Cl- and HCO3 - as dominant cation and anions, respectively. It was found that the concentration of Total Dissolved Solids and Total Hardness in the confined aquifer exceed their maximum permissible limits for drinking water. The US Salinity Laboratory diagram revealed high salinity in the groundwater with low sodium hazard. In terms of magnesium hazard, groundwater of the entire area is unsuitable for irrigation.

Keywords


Groundwater Quality, Geochemical Classification, Spatio-Temporal Variation, Hydrochemical Facies.

References