Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development of Geomorphic Response Runoff Model for June Month for Small Watersheds


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture (MPKV), Dhule (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Computation of runoff due to effective rainfall is essential to estimate soil erosion and sediment load in streams. Moreover, the estimation of runoff distribution with time and peak runoff rate are needed in several hydrologic applications, including design of hydraulic structures, flood prevention works and design of drainage systems. Computation of runoff due to effective rainfall is essential. This requires comprehensive knowledge of the various hydrological phenomena occurring in the catchment. All the watersheds cannot be gauged, as it would be costly and time consuming. Therefore, the indirect method of runoff quantification has to be resorted. The geomorphic parameters are quite useful as they reflect all the causative factors of the runoff. In the present study ten watersheds from Tapi catchment, Maharashtra, India were selected for development of geomorphic response models for prediction of June monthly runoff. Twelve geomorphic parameters were selected for development of model out of which two parameters, Sa and Rb are screened out in the principal component analysis. Remaining ten parameters are grouped into three physically significant components. The data sets was used to regress the runoff factor, R /√ A , on three independent parameters (one each from already established components and rainfall factor, P /√ A . It is observed that percentage deviation ranges from 0.3 to 7.0 using monthly runoff model for June. Therefore, developed runoff can be conveniently used for prediction of June month runoff from unguaged watersheds of the basin having similar physiographic conditions.

Keywords

Geomorphic Response Model, Geomorphological Parameters, Runoff, Sediment Production Rate, PCA.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Binjolkar, P. and Keshari, A.K. (2007). Estimating geomorphological parameters using GIS for Tilaiya reservoir catchment. IE(I) J. – CV., 88 : 21-26.
  • Borah, D.K. and Bere, M. (2003). Watershed scale hydrology and non point source pollution models: Review of mathematical bases. Trans. ASAE, 46 (6) : 1553-1560.
  • Gosain, A.K., Mani., A. and Dwivedi, C. (2009). Hydrological modelling-Literature Review – Climawater, 4 : 1-24.
  • Horton, R.E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basin, hydrological approach to quantitative morphology. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 56: 275-370.
  • Jain, M.K. and Kothyari, U. C. (2000). Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS. J. Hydrol. Sci., 45(5): 771-786.
  • Kumar, R., Lohani, A. K., Kumar, S., Chattergi, C. and Nema. R. K. (2001). GIS based morphometric analysis of Ajay river basin upto Saraha gauging site of south Bihar. J. Appl. Hydrol., 24 (4): 45-54.
  • Kumar, V. (1991). Deterministic modeling of annual runoff and sediment production rate for small watersheds of Damodar Valley Catchment, Indian J. Soil Cons., 19 (1 & 2): 66-74.
  • Leopold, L.B. and Miller, J.P. (1956). Ephemeral streams – Hydrualic factors and their relation to drainage net. U.S. Geol. Surv. Proc.: 282-A.
  • Olivera, F. and Maidment, D. (1999). Geographical information system (GIS) - based spatially distributed model for runoff routine.Water Resour. Res., 35(4):1155-1164.
  • Pandey, A., Chaudhary, V.M. and Mal, B.C. (2004). Morphological analysis of watershed management using GIS. Hydrol. J. IAH., 27 (2 & 3): 71-84.
  • Sharma, S. K., Rajput, G. S., Tignath, S. and Pandey, R. P. (2010). Morphometric analysis and prioritization of a watershed using GIS. J. Indian Water Res. Soc., 30 (2): 33-39.
  • Singh, P.K., Kumar, V., Purohit, R.C., Kothari, M. and Dashora, P.K. (2009). Application of principle component analysis in grouping geomorphic parameters for hydrological modelling.Water Res. Manage., 23: 325-339.
  • Strahler, A.N. (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 38 : 913-920.

Abstract Views: 214

PDF Views: 0




  • Development of Geomorphic Response Runoff Model for June Month for Small Watersheds

Abstract Views: 214  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sandip P. Nikam
Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture (MPKV), Dhule (M.S.), India

Abstract


Computation of runoff due to effective rainfall is essential to estimate soil erosion and sediment load in streams. Moreover, the estimation of runoff distribution with time and peak runoff rate are needed in several hydrologic applications, including design of hydraulic structures, flood prevention works and design of drainage systems. Computation of runoff due to effective rainfall is essential. This requires comprehensive knowledge of the various hydrological phenomena occurring in the catchment. All the watersheds cannot be gauged, as it would be costly and time consuming. Therefore, the indirect method of runoff quantification has to be resorted. The geomorphic parameters are quite useful as they reflect all the causative factors of the runoff. In the present study ten watersheds from Tapi catchment, Maharashtra, India were selected for development of geomorphic response models for prediction of June monthly runoff. Twelve geomorphic parameters were selected for development of model out of which two parameters, Sa and Rb are screened out in the principal component analysis. Remaining ten parameters are grouped into three physically significant components. The data sets was used to regress the runoff factor, R /√ A , on three independent parameters (one each from already established components and rainfall factor, P /√ A . It is observed that percentage deviation ranges from 0.3 to 7.0 using monthly runoff model for June. Therefore, developed runoff can be conveniently used for prediction of June month runoff from unguaged watersheds of the basin having similar physiographic conditions.

Keywords


Geomorphic Response Model, Geomorphological Parameters, Runoff, Sediment Production Rate, PCA.

References