International Journal of Agricultural Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment of Hydrological Processes in a Small Watershed Using Swat


Affiliations
1 Department of Land and Water Resources Conservation Engineering, Kelappaji College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Tavanur, Malappuram (Kerala), India
2 Kelappaji College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Tavanur, Malappuram (Kerala), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Water availability is declining and the demand is increasing, leaving the gap between these two more wide day by day. Quantifying the elements of hydrologic processes at micro watershed scale and at weekly or monthly temporal scale is the prerequisite for water resources development of a locality. Hydrologic modeling is a very powerful technique in planning water resources of a locality. Valancheri watershed, which is a sub basin of Bharathapuzha river basin, Kerala is taken for the study. As the study watershed is ungauged one, calibration was done for Kunthipuzha basin which is having similar characteristics with the study area and the calibrated parameters were transferred to the study watershed (Regionalization technique). The model was calibrated for the period 2000-2006 and validated for 2007-2009. Performance of the model was satisfactory with NSE=0.81, R2=0.82 for calibration period and R2=0.95, NSE=0.82 for validation period. The calibrated model was used to predict the hydrologic elements of the Valancheri watershed at micro watershed level. The simulation results were great use in planning water resources development of the locality.

Keywords

Watershed Model, SWAT, ArcGIS, Hydrological Response Units, Water Balance Components.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S. and Williams, J.R. (1998). Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34 (1): 73-89.

  • Arnold, J.G. and Fohrer, N. (2005). SWAT 2000: Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrological Processes, 19(3): 563-572.

  • Arnold, J.G., Moriasi, D.N., Gassman, P.W., Abbaspour, K.C., White, M.J., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C., Harmel, R.D., Van Griensvan, A., Van Liew, M.W., Kannan, N. and Jha, M.K. (2012). SWAT: model use, calibration and validation. Trans. ASABE., 55(4):1491-1508.

  • Beven, K.J. and Kirkby, M.J. (1979). A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 24(1): 43-69.

  • Borah, D.K. and Bera, M. (2003). Watershed-scale hydrologic and non point-source pollution models: Review of mathematical bases. Trans. ASAE, 40: 1553-1566.

  • Emam, A.R., Kappas, M., Nguyen, L.H.K. and Renchin, T. (2016). Hydrological modeling in an ungauged basin of Central Vietnam using SWAT model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 1-32.

  • Gassman, P.W., Reyes, M.R., Green, C.H. and Arnold, G. (2007). The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications and future research directions, Trans. ASABE, 50 (4): 1211-1250.

  • Gitau, M.W. and Chaubey, I. (2010). Regionalization of Swat parameters for use in ungauged watersheds. Water, 2: 849-871.

  • Gosain, A.K., Rao, S. and Arora, A. (2011). Climate change impact assessment of water resources of India. Curr. Sci., 101 : 356-371.

  • Laflen, J.M., Lane, L.J. and Foster, G.R. (1991). WEPP: A new generation of erosion prediction technology. J. Soil. Water. Conserv., 46: 34-38.

  • Leta, O.T., Kadi, A., Dulai, H. and Ghazal, A. (2016). Assessment of climate change impacts on water balance components of Heeia watershed in Hawaii. J. Hydrol., 8: 182-197.

  • Malunjkar, V.S., Shinde, M.G., Ghotekar, S.S. and Atre, A.A. (2015). Estimation of surface runoff using SWAT model. Int. J. Inventive Engg. Sci., 3(4):12-15.

  • Nash , J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10 : 282-290.

  • Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R. and King, K.W. (2005). SWAT theoretical documentation version 2005. Soil and Water Research Laboratory, ARS, Temple Texas, USA.

  • Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R. and Williams, J.R. (2011). Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Technical report No.406, Texas Water Resources Institute.

  • Pechlivanidis, I.G., Jackson, B.M., Mcintyre, N.R. and Wheater, H.S. (2011). Catchment scale hydrological modeling: A Review of model types, calibration approaches and uncertainty analysis methods in the context of recent developments in technology and applications. Glob. NEST J. 13 (3) : 193-214.

  • Saleh, A. and Du, B. (2004). Evaluation of SWAT and HSPF within basin programme for Upper North Bosque River watershed in central Texas. Trans. ASAE., 47(4): 1039-1049.

  • Santhi, C., Arnold, J.G., Williams, J.R., Dugas, W.A., Srinivasan, R. and Hauck, L.M. (2001). Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and non point sources. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(5): 1169-1188.

  • Spruill, C.A., Workman, S.R. and Taraba, J.L. (2001). Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model. Trans. ASAE., 43(6): 1431-1439.

  • Van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grunwald, S., Bishop, T., Di luzio, M. and Srinivasan, R. (2006). A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J. Hydrol., 324: 10-23.


Abstract Views: 217

PDF Views: 0




  • Assessment of Hydrological Processes in a Small Watershed Using Swat

Abstract Views: 217  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

V. Tejaswini
Department of Land and Water Resources Conservation Engineering, Kelappaji College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Tavanur, Malappuram (Kerala), India
K. K. Sathian
Kelappaji College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Tavanur, Malappuram (Kerala), India

Abstract


Water availability is declining and the demand is increasing, leaving the gap between these two more wide day by day. Quantifying the elements of hydrologic processes at micro watershed scale and at weekly or monthly temporal scale is the prerequisite for water resources development of a locality. Hydrologic modeling is a very powerful technique in planning water resources of a locality. Valancheri watershed, which is a sub basin of Bharathapuzha river basin, Kerala is taken for the study. As the study watershed is ungauged one, calibration was done for Kunthipuzha basin which is having similar characteristics with the study area and the calibrated parameters were transferred to the study watershed (Regionalization technique). The model was calibrated for the period 2000-2006 and validated for 2007-2009. Performance of the model was satisfactory with NSE=0.81, R2=0.82 for calibration period and R2=0.95, NSE=0.82 for validation period. The calibrated model was used to predict the hydrologic elements of the Valancheri watershed at micro watershed level. The simulation results were great use in planning water resources development of the locality.

Keywords


Watershed Model, SWAT, ArcGIS, Hydrological Response Units, Water Balance Components.

References