Indian Science Cruiser

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Antinutritional Factors the ‘Biomolecules’ Mediated Natural and Induced Host Defence in Food Crops


Affiliations
1 Department of Botany, Bankura Christian College, Bankura-722101, West Bengal, India
2 Regional Centre of Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, ICAR, Bhubaneswar-751019, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Tuber crops is one of the major food crops which provide food to millions of people around the globe. Especially the tropical tuber crops viz. cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.), taro (colocasia esculenta L.), yams (Dioscorea alata, Dioscorea rotundata and Dioscorea esculenta) and chinese potato (Solenostemon rotundifolius) are now getting worldwide importance as economical source of energy. Tubers of all these crops are also rich in vitamins and minerals and can be a good source of dietary supplement. Leaves rich in protein, vitamins and minerals are used as fodder.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • L W Kitch, R E Shade and L L Murdock, Resistance to cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculata) larva in pods of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), Entomol Exp Appl., 60, 183–192, 1991.

  • T O Tayo, Anatomical basis of cowpea resistance to pod borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer), Insect Sci Appl., 10, 631–638, 1989.

  • P Koona, E O Osisanya, L E N Jackai, M Tamo, J Reeves and J D A’Hughes, Pod surface characteristics in wild and cultivated Vigna species and resistance to the coreid bug Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stal. (Hemiptera: Coreidae), Insect Sci Appl., 22, 1–8, 2002.

  • O Edwards and B K Singh, Resistance to insect pests: What do legumes have to offer?, Euphytica , 147, 273–285, 2006.

  • F D Dakora and D A Phillips, Diverse functions of isoflavonoids in legumes transcend anti-microbial definitions of phytoalexins, Physiol Mol Plant Pathol., 49, 1–20, 1996.

  • B J Burden and D M Norris, Role of the isoflavonoid coumestrol in the constitutive antixenosic properties of “Davis” soybeans against an oligophagous insect, theMexican bean beetle, J Chem Ecol., 18, 1069–1082, 1992.

  • I E Liener and M L Kakade, In I E Liener (Ed.), Protease inhibitors in toxic constituents of plant foodstuff, New York, Academic Press, pp. 7–71, 1980.

  • M Nakase, T Adachi, A Vrisu, T Miyashita, A M Alvarez, S Nagasaka, et al., Rice (Oryza sativa) alpha amylase inhibitors of 14–16 kDa are potential allergens and products of multigene family, Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 44, 9, 2624–2628, 1996.

  • N R Reddy and M D Pierson, Reduction in antinutritional toxic components in plant by fermentation, Food Research International, 27, 281–290, 1994.

  • G N Medoua, M I Lape, T Agbor-Egbe and C M F Mbofung, Antinutritional factors changes occurring in trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) tubers after harvest, Food Chemistry, 102, 716– 720, 2007.

  • T C Elden, Effects of proteinase inhibitors and plant lectins on the adult alfalfa weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), J Entomol Sci., 35, 62–69, 2000.

  • D C Stamopoulos, Influence of the Leguminosae secondary substances on the ecology and biology of Bruchidae, Entomologia Hellenica, 5, 61–67, 1987.

  • Y Nakamura, A Kaihara, K Yoshii, Y Tsumura, S Ishimitsu and Y Tonogai, Content and composition of isoflavonoids in mature and immature beans and bean sprouts consumed in Japan, J Health Sci., 47, 394–406, 2001.

  • T C Osborne, M D Burwo and F A Bliss, Bean arcelin 2. Genetic variation, inheritance and linkage relationships of a novel seed protein of Phaseolus vulgaris L., Theor Appl Genet., 71, 847–855, 1986.

  • J Romero-Andreas, B S Yandell and F A Bliss, Bean arcelin 1. Inheritance of a novel seed protein of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and its effect on seed composition, Theor Appl Genet., 72, 123–128, 1986.

  • K Zhu-Salzman, P K Hammen, R A Salzman, H Koiwa, R A Bressan, L L Murdock and P M Hasegawa, Calcium modulates protease resistance and carbohydrate binding of a plant defense legume lectin, Griffonia simplicifolia lectin II (GSII), Comp Biochem Physiol., 132, 327–334, 2002.

  • F Fitches, A M R Gatehouse and J A Gatehouse, Effects of snowdrop lectin (GNA) delivered via artificial diet and transgenic plants on the development of tomato moth (Lacanobia oleracea) larvae in laboratory and glasshouse trials, J Insect Physiol., 43, 727–739, 1997.

  • A M R Gatehouse, G M Davison, C A Newell, A Merryweather, W D O Hamilton, E P J Burgess, R J C Gilbert and J A Gatehouse, Transgenic potato plants with enhanced resistance to the tomato moth, Lacaobia oleracea: Growth room trials, Mol Breed., 3, 49–63, 1997.

  • E Stoger, S Williams, P Christou, R E Down and J A Gatehouse, Expression of the insecticidal lectin from snowdrop (Galanthus nivalis agglutin; GNA) in transgenic wheat plants: Effects on predation by the grain aphid Sito bion avenae, Mol Breed., 5, 65– 73, 1999.

  • X Foissac, N T Loc, P Christou, A M R Gatehouse and J A Gatehouse, Resistance to green leaf hopper (Nephotettix virescens) and brown plant hopper (Nilaparvata lugens) in transgenic rice expressing snowdrop lectin (Galanthus nivalis agglutin, GNA), J Insect Physiol., 46, 573–583, 2000.

  • R E Down, L Ford, S D Woodhouse, G M Davison, M E N Majerus, J A Gatehouse and A M R Gatehouse, Tritrophic interactions between transgenic potato expressing snowdrop lectin (GNA), and aphid pest (peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulz.)) and a beneficial predator (2-spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata L.), Transgenic Res., 12, 229–241, 2003.

  • R L Morton, H E Schroeder, K S Bateman, M J Chrispeels, E Armstrong and T J V Higgins, Bean α-amylase inhibitor 1 in transgenic peas (Pisum sativum) provides complete protection from pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum) under field conditions, Proc Natl Acad Sci., 97, 3820–3825, 2000.

  • B K Sarmah, A Moore, W Tate, L Movgiv, R L Morton, D P Rees, P Chiaiese, M J Chrispeels, L M Tabe and T J V Higgins, Transgenic chickpea seeds expressing high levels of a bean α-amylase inhibitor, Mol Breed, 14, 73–82, 2004.

  • S Louis, B Delobel, F Gressent, I Rahioui, L Quillien, A Vallier and Y Rahbe, Molecular and biological screening for insecttoxic seed albumins from four legume species, Plant Sci., 167, 705– 714, 2004.

  • F Gressent, I Rahioui and Y Rahbe, Characterization of a high-affinity binding site for the pea albumin 1b entomotoxin in the weevil Sitophilus, Eur J Biochem., 270, 2429–2435, 2003.

  • D P Bown, H S Wilkinson and J A Gatehouse, Regulation of expression of genes encoding digestive proteases in the gut of a polyphagous lepidopteran larva in response to dietary protease inhibitors, Physiol Entomol., 29, 278–290, 2004.

  • K Zhu-Salzman, H Koiwa, R A Salzman, R E Shade and J -E Ahn, Cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculates uses a three component strategy to overcome a plant defensive cysteine protease inhibitor, Insect Mol Biol., 12, 135–145, 2003.

  • J Moon, R A Salzman, J Ahn, H Koiwa and K Zhu-Salzman, Transcriptional regulation in cowpea bruchid guts during adaptation to a plant defence protease inhibitor, Insect Mol Biol., 13, 283–291, 2004.

  • L Jouanin, M. Boande-Bottino, C Girard, G Morrot and M Giband, Transgenic plants for insect resistance, Plant Sci., 131, 1–11, 1998.

  • P Pompermayer, A R Lopes, W R Terra, J R P Parra, M C Falco and M C Silva-Filho, Effects of soybean proteinase inhibitor on development, survival, and reproductive potential of the sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis, Entomol. Exp. Appl , 99, 79–85, 2001.

  • M T McManus, E P J Burgess, P Bruce, L M Watson, W A Laing, C R Voisey and D W R White, Expression of the soybean (Kunitz) trypsin inhibitor in transgenic tobacco: Effects on larval development of Spodoptera littoralis, Transgen Res., 8, 383–395, 1999.

  • E A Bell, K P W C Perera, P B Nunn, M S J Simmonds and W M Blaney, Non-protein amino acids of Lathyrus latifolius as feeding deterrents and phagostimulants in Spodoptera littoralis, Phytochemistry, 43, 1003–1007, 1996.

  • O L Franco, D J Rigden, F R Melo and m F GrossideS´, Plant α-amylase inhibitors and their interaction with insect α-amylases. Structure, function and potential for crop protection, Eur. J. Biochem., 269, 397–412, 2002.

  • K Konno, C Hirayama and H Shinbo, Glycine in digestive juice: a strategy of herbivorous insects against chemical defense of host plants, J. Insect. Physiol., 43, 217–224, 1997

  • M Ishimoto and M J Chrispeels, Protective mechanism of the Mexican bean weevil against high levels of α-amylase inhibitor in the common bean, Plant Physiol , 111, 393–401,1996.

  • X Li, M A Schuler and M R Berenbaum, Jasmonate and salicylate induce expression of herbivore cytochrome P450 genes, Nature, 419, 712–715, 2002a.

  • X Li, M R Berenbaum and M A Schuler, Plant allelochemicals differentially regulate Helicoverpa zea cytochrome P450 genes, Insect Mol Biol., 11, 343–351, 2002b.

  • S P Ghosh, T Ramanujam, J S Jos, S N Moorthy and R G Nair (Eds.), 1988. Tuber crops, Oxford IBH, pp.305-358, 1988.

  • D T Coxon, S K Ogundava and C Dennis, Antifungal phenanthrenes in yam tubers, Phytochem., 21, 1389-1392, 1982.

  • S L Clement, Insect resistance in the wild relatives of food legumes and wheat, In: J.A. McComb (Ed.), Plant Breeding for the 11th Millennium. Proceedings of the 12th Australasian Plant Breeding Conference, Perth, WA, 15–20 September, 2002.

  • R A Dixon, C J Lamb, S Masoud, V J H Sewalt and N L Paiva, Metabolic engineering: Prospects for crop improvement through the genetic manipulation of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and defense responses – a review, Gene, 179, 61–71, 1996.

  • P A Kumar, A Mandaokar, K Sreenivasu, S K Chakrabrati, S R Sharma, S Bisaria, S R Sharma, S Kaur and P R Sharma, Insect-resistant transgenic brinjal plants, Mol. Breed., 4, 33-37, 1998.

  • P N Mwangi and E Adrian, Assessing risks and benefits: Bt maize in Kenya, Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 48, 6-9, 2001.

  • B E Tabashnik, Evaluation of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 39, 47-49, 1994.

  • P A Kumar, Bacillus thuringiensis and insect pest management in agriculture, Proc. of AP Akademi of Sciences, Vol 6, No 1, 29-36, 2002.


Abstract Views: 359

PDF Views: 5




  • Antinutritional Factors the ‘Biomolecules’ Mediated Natural and Induced Host Defence in Food Crops

Abstract Views: 359  |  PDF Views: 5

Authors

Arpita Banerjee
Department of Botany, Bankura Christian College, Bankura-722101, West Bengal, India
Archana Mukherjee
Regional Centre of Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, ICAR, Bhubaneswar-751019, India
Korada Rajasekhara Rao
Regional Centre of Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, ICAR, Bhubaneswar-751019, India
Arijit Sinhababu
Department of Botany, Bankura Christian College, Bankura-722101, West Bengal, India

Abstract


Tuber crops is one of the major food crops which provide food to millions of people around the globe. Especially the tropical tuber crops viz. cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.), taro (colocasia esculenta L.), yams (Dioscorea alata, Dioscorea rotundata and Dioscorea esculenta) and chinese potato (Solenostemon rotundifolius) are now getting worldwide importance as economical source of energy. Tubers of all these crops are also rich in vitamins and minerals and can be a good source of dietary supplement. Leaves rich in protein, vitamins and minerals are used as fodder.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.24906/isc%2F2018%2Fv32%2Fi4%2F176486