Performance-Governance Tax Administration Reform Model as an Instrument for Tax Revenue Generation in Nigeria
The paper aims to developed tax administration reform model for revenue generation in Nigeria. To achieve this, literatures on the previous tax administration models and principles were reviewed and analysed. It can be concluded that an excellent tax policy in every economy is worthless if it cannot be effectively and efficiently implemented. One method of improving tax administration undertaking on revenue generation is to introduce a good model of how it is supposed to be and then compare the actual tax administration operations in the economy to examine how it deviates from the model. Along this, the paper developed a model called “Performance-Governance tax administration model” which aim to enhance tax administration efficiency and effectiveness in Nigeria.
- i. Afuberoh, D., & Okoye, E. (2014). The impact of taxation on revenue generation in Nigeria: a study of Federal capital territory and selected States. International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research (IJPAMR), 2(2), 2247.
- ii. Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of good governance worldwide: what is the trigger?. Organization Studies, 25(3), 415-443.
- iii. Alli, B. D.(2009). Managing the tax reform process in Nigeria. Nigeria Account, 4(2) 45-51.
- iv. Aminu, A. A., & Eluwa, D. I. (2014). The impact of tax reforms on government revenue generation in Nigeria. Ekonomski ISocijalni Razvoj, 1(1), 1-10.
- v. Australian National Audit Office (1998). Better practice principles for performance information. Canberra: Australian National Office.
- vi. Bird, R. M., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Alm, J. (2003). Public finance in developing and transitional countries, Edward Elgar Publishing.
- vii. Fasoranti, M. M. (2013). Tax productivity and economic growth. Lorem Journal of Business and Economics (LJBE), 1(1), 110.
- viii. Fjeldstad, O. H. (2006). Tax evasion and fiscal corruption: Essays on compliance and tax administrative practices in East and South Africa. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.
- ix. Frampton, D. (1993), Practical Tax Administration, The Looseleaf Company, Melksham, Wilts.
- x. Gallagher, M. (2005). Benchmarking tax systems. Public Administration and Development, 25(2), 125-144.
- xi. Gill, J. B. S. (2003). The nuts and bolts of revenue administration reform, World Bank. Washington DC., USA. The World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTTPA/Resources/NutsBolts.pdf
- xii. Gill, Jit B.S. (2000). A diagnostic model for revenue administration. World Bank, Technical Paper No. 472, Washington, D.C., USA.
- xiii. Globadian, A., & Ashworth, J. (1994). Performance measurement in local government concept and practice, International Journal of Production & Production Management, 14(5), 35-51.
- xiv. Gordon, R., & Li, W. (2009). Tax structures in developing countries: Many puzzles and a possible explanation. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7), 855-866.
- xv. James, S., Svetalekth, T., & Wright, B. (2007). Tax charters, performance indicators and the case for amore strategic approach to tax administration. Retrieved from http://businessschool.exeter.ac.uk/documents/discussion_papers/management/2007/0712.pdf
- xvi. Mba, O. (2012). Transparency and accountability of tax administration in the UK: The nature and scope of taxpayer confidentiality. British Tax Review, (2), 187-225.
- xvii. Odusola, A. (2006). Tax policy reforms in Nigeria. Research Paper No. 2006/03 United Nations University-World Institute for Development Economics Research.
- xviii. OECD (1999). Principles of Good Tax Administration – Practice Note. Paris: OECD.
- xix. OECD (2001). ‘Performance Measurement in Tax Administration - Practice Note’. Committee of Fiscal Affairs Forum on Strategic Management, OECD, Paris.
- xx. Prasopoulou, E. (2011). In quest for accountability in Greek public administration: The case of the Taxation Information System (TAXIS).
- xxi. Rakner, L., & Gloppen, S. (2003). Tax reform and democratic accountability in sub-Saharan Africa. In Beyond Structural Adjustment the Institutional Context of African Development (pp. 77-100). Palgrave, Macmillan US.
- xxii. Sabates, R., & Schneider, A. (2003). Taxation, Accountability and the Poor. In Seminar Report, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
- xxiii. Schacter, M. (1999). Means... ends... indicators: performance measurement in the public sector. Policy Brief, April, No.3. Institute on Governance.
- xxiv. Shah, H. (2006). Accountability for performance: the case of a tax administration Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick, England.
- xxv. Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17-28.
- xxvi. Therkildsen, O. (2004). Autonomous tax administration in sub-Saharan Africa: the case of the Uganda revenue authority. In Forum for Development Studies, 31 (1), 59-88.
Abstract Views: 185
PDF Views: 5