The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Cultural Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Classification of Languages and Dialects into Rhythm Classes and the Production of Non-native English Prosody: A Comparative Study


Affiliations
1 Institut Superieur des Langues de Tunis, Tunisia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The world's languages are generally classified into two categories on the basis of their rhythmic organization. The most well-known classification, proposed by Pike (1945), is the "stress-timed" language classification, in which stresses tend to recur at regular time intervals. English is one example of such a language category. "Syllable-timed" languages, where all syllables - stressed or unstressed - are produced at equal duration, are exemplified by French. Later, a third group was equally proposed: "mora-timed" languages, exemplified by Japanese and Tamil. "A mora is a unit of timing. Each mora takes the same length of time to say" (Ladefoged, 1975). However, the main problem in categorizing these types of languages was trying to find experimental evidence or acoustic correlates of language rhythm in the speech signal. Since the late 1960s, linguists have been trying to provide empirical support for the "isochrony/regularity theory" with varying degrees of success. The most that can be said for its legitimization is that a tendency toward isochrony is best felt at a perceptual level. In this research, it was hypothesized that a perceptual study could generate more convincing results relevant to rhythm typology. This approach has been adopted by using discrimination experiments based on spectral inversion in order to decide the rhythmic status of many languages as well as many Arabic and English dialects. Based upon the results of this study, it made sense for listeners to use rhythm as an essential cue to classify languages and dialects according to their rhythmic properties. Listeners were also able to perceive rhythmic differences between languages and dialects belonging to the same rhythm class. This implies the possibility of subclasses of broad rhythmic categories (Ghazali et al., 2002; Hamdi et al., 2005; Ben Abda, 2004). When non-native speakers of English produced read and spontaneous speech, they tended to use some of their first language prosodic features in the production of English suprasegmentals, which resulted in differences between native and non-native English in terms of rhythm and stress.

Keywords

Rhythmic Typology, Suprasegmentals, Prosodic Transfer.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abercrombie, David. Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1967.

  • Ben Abda, Imen. The Perception of Rhythm in English and Tunisian Arabic: a Comparative Study. (Unpublished master's thesis). Institut Supérieur des Langues de Tunis, Tunis, 2004.

  • Blesser, B. "Speech Perception under Conditions of Spectral Transformation: Phonetic Characteristics". Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 15 (1972): 4-41.

  • Boersma, Paul., & Weenink, David. Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Available from www.praat.org, 1992-2001

  • Burgess, John., & Spencer, Sheila. "Phonology and Pronunciation in Integrated Language Teaching and Teacher Education". System 28 (2000): 191-215.

  • Capiliez, Marc. Experimental Research into the Acquisition of English. Rhythm and Prosody by French Learners. (Master 2). Université Lille 3, 2011.

  • Chen, Chi-Fen, et al. "A New Perspective on Teaching English Pronunciation: Rhythm". Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on English Teaching, ERIC, Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 638, 1996.

  • Chen, Yang, et al. "A study of Sentence Stress Production in Mandarin Speakers in American English". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109, 4 (2001): 1681-1690.

  • Fujisaki, Hiroya, et al. "Comparison of Acoustic Features of Word Accent in English and Japanese". Journal of the Acoustic Society of Japan 7 (1986): 57-63.

  • Ghazali, Salem, et al. "Speech Rhythm Variation in Arabic Dialects". In 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, 2002.

  • Hamdi, Rym, et al. " Syllable Structure in Spoken Arabic: a Comparative Investigation". In proceedings of Inter speech 2005 - Euro speech - 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Lisbonne, Portugal, 2005.

  • Henry, Guillaume, et al. "Tools Devoted to the Acquisition of the Prosody of Foreign Language". Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrucken, Germany, 2007, 1593-1596.

  • Kohler, Klaus. J. C. "Segmental Reduction in connected Speech in German: Phonological Facts and Phonetic Explanations". In Hardcastle, W.J. & Marchal, A. (eds.) Speech Production and Speech Modelling. Dordrecht:Kluwer, (1990): 69-92.

  • Ladefoged, Peter. A Course in Phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975.

  • Pike, Kenneth.L. The intonation of American English. USA: Michigan University Press, 1945.

  • Rehor, Claudia & Paetzold, Matthias. "The phonetic Realization of Function words in German spontaneous Speech". In A. P. Simpson and M. Patzold (Eds.), Sound Patterns of Connected Speech: Description, Models, and Explanation, AIPUK 31(1996): 5-10.

  • Takayuki, Arai, & Greenberg, Steven. "The Temporal Properties of Spoken Japanese are Similar to those of English". Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech) 2, 1997: 1011-1014, Rhodes.

  • Vaissiere, Jacqueline. "Rhythm, Accentuation and Final Lengthening in French". In J. Sundberg, L. Nord, & R. Carlson (eds), Music, Language, Speech and Brain, Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series. Macmillan, 1991: 108-120.

  • Whitworth, Nicole. "Speech Rhythm Production in Three German-English Bilingual families". In Nelson, D, (ed.) Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 9 (2002): 175-205.


Abstract Views: 248

PDF Views: 2




  • The Classification of Languages and Dialects into Rhythm Classes and the Production of Non-native English Prosody: A Comparative Study

Abstract Views: 248  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Imen Ben Abda
Institut Superieur des Langues de Tunis, Tunisia

Abstract


The world's languages are generally classified into two categories on the basis of their rhythmic organization. The most well-known classification, proposed by Pike (1945), is the "stress-timed" language classification, in which stresses tend to recur at regular time intervals. English is one example of such a language category. "Syllable-timed" languages, where all syllables - stressed or unstressed - are produced at equal duration, are exemplified by French. Later, a third group was equally proposed: "mora-timed" languages, exemplified by Japanese and Tamil. "A mora is a unit of timing. Each mora takes the same length of time to say" (Ladefoged, 1975). However, the main problem in categorizing these types of languages was trying to find experimental evidence or acoustic correlates of language rhythm in the speech signal. Since the late 1960s, linguists have been trying to provide empirical support for the "isochrony/regularity theory" with varying degrees of success. The most that can be said for its legitimization is that a tendency toward isochrony is best felt at a perceptual level. In this research, it was hypothesized that a perceptual study could generate more convincing results relevant to rhythm typology. This approach has been adopted by using discrimination experiments based on spectral inversion in order to decide the rhythmic status of many languages as well as many Arabic and English dialects. Based upon the results of this study, it made sense for listeners to use rhythm as an essential cue to classify languages and dialects according to their rhythmic properties. Listeners were also able to perceive rhythmic differences between languages and dialects belonging to the same rhythm class. This implies the possibility of subclasses of broad rhythmic categories (Ghazali et al., 2002; Hamdi et al., 2005; Ben Abda, 2004). When non-native speakers of English produced read and spontaneous speech, they tended to use some of their first language prosodic features in the production of English suprasegmentals, which resulted in differences between native and non-native English in terms of rhythm and stress.

Keywords


Rhythmic Typology, Suprasegmentals, Prosodic Transfer.

References