Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Environment and Well-Being among Tribal and Non-Tribal


Affiliations
1 Department ofPsychology, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara, Bihar, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study presents the positive and negative impacts of environment regarding attitudes and behaviours among adolescents. And the study leads to insist on the importance of bringing the resolution in the curriculum to increase environmentalism in society of tribal and non tribal both groups. The study reported attitudes towards environment among tribal and non tribal group so it is essential that individuals somehow cause environmental problems should be aware of their Responsibility in solving these problems non tribal group should remind reminder about for this there should be a practice a successful environmental training at all stages of education, based on the findings of the some researches. It is seen that the best educational stage to provide environmental training efficiency in adolescence.

Keywords

Environment, Well-Being, Aggression, Tribal and Non-Tribal.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). Attitude behaviour relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
  • Alp, EAn Analysis Of Turkish Students Environmental Knowledge And Attitude. Msc Thesis Unpublished And Kara Middle East Technical University,
  • Arslan, S. (2012). The influence of environment education on critical thinking and environmental attitud q. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 55,902-909.
  • Atkinson, R.C., Smith, B.D.J., & Nolan, S. (1996). Hill guards introduction to psychology. Fort Worth Tx Harcourt Brace College Publisher saslan,
  • Clifrd, G. (1966). Religion as cultural system in anthropological approaches to the study of religion. London: Michelle Banta Tavistock Publication.
  • Cetin, O.B. (2002). Environmental knowledge ineskisehir. Unpublished Thesis
  • Dumonont, L. (1980). Homo Hierarchicus: Caste system and its implication. Chicago University Of Chicago Press, p. 224.
  • Ertain, S. (2012). Environmental consciousness among turkish and aajairi candidate teachers. Educational Science, Xxxvii(166), 88-100.
  • Femandez-Manzanal, R., Rodriguez-Barreiro, L., & Carrasquer, J. (2007). Evaluation of environmental attitudes: Analysis and results of a scale applied to university students. Science Education, 91 (6), 988-1009.
  • Ghatak, N. (2001). Scheduled tribes of India in the new millennium research in anthropology. Southeast Asia With Special Reference To India Kolkata.
  • Gigliotti, L.M. (1981). Environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education andBehaviourr 24(1), 15-26.
  • Hungerford, H.R., & Wall, T.l. (1990). Changing learner behaviour through environmental education. Environmental Education, 21, 8-21.
  • Kollmuss, A., &Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239-260.
  • Mahato, Pp. The Performing Arts of Jharkhand, Bb, Prakashan, Kolkata 1987
  • Mahato, Pp. Jharkhander Hor Mittan, Samajik Sabhyata Shilpa Chetna Jeevan Raj Board PrashikDurgaNagar Kolkata 2001.
  • Mn Srinivas, Social Change In Modem India, Berkeley Los Angeles University Of California Press 1966.
  • Roy Sc, The Mundas And Their Country, Kolkata 1912.
  • Ulucinar, S.S., Aslan, O., & Cansaran, A. (2008). The examination of elementary school students’environmental knowledge and environmental attitudes with respect to the different variables. Elementary Education Online, 7(2), 496-511.
  • Ugulu, I., & Ercol, S. (2013). Environmental attitudes of biology teachers candidates and the assessments in terms of some variables and w essay. Education Science 5(l),79-89.
  • Wallace, D.S., & Poison, R.M. (2005). Which behaviours to attitude protect: A meta analysis. Effects of Social Pressure and Perceived Difficulty Review General Psychology.
  • Yorek, N., Ugulu, I.M.; Dogeny: A qualitative investigation of students understanding about ecosystem and its components Nathura. MtEngenier, 9(3), 973-981.

Abstract Views: 245

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Environment and Well-Being among Tribal and Non-Tribal

Abstract Views: 245  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Pratibha Singh
Department ofPsychology, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara, Bihar, India

Abstract


This study presents the positive and negative impacts of environment regarding attitudes and behaviours among adolescents. And the study leads to insist on the importance of bringing the resolution in the curriculum to increase environmentalism in society of tribal and non tribal both groups. The study reported attitudes towards environment among tribal and non tribal group so it is essential that individuals somehow cause environmental problems should be aware of their Responsibility in solving these problems non tribal group should remind reminder about for this there should be a practice a successful environmental training at all stages of education, based on the findings of the some researches. It is seen that the best educational stage to provide environmental training efficiency in adolescence.

Keywords


Environment, Well-Being, Aggression, Tribal and Non-Tribal.

References