Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Morpho-Agronomic Diversity in Pole-Type Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Landraces from Lushai Hills of North-East India


Affiliations
1 ICAR-RC NEH Region, Mizoram Centre, Kolasib - 796 081, India
 

The present study was based on morphological and agronomical characterization of 23 pole-type common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces collected from Lushai hills of North-East India. Extensive variation in plant and seed traits was found in 16 morphological and agronomical characters. Cluster analysis based on Euclidean distance grouped the genotypes into five main branches, reflecting their growth type and reproductive traits. Significant positive or negative correlation was observed among important traits. Principal component analysis was used for assessing patterns of variation by accounting for all the 10 quantitative and six qualitative variables together. Ordination among accessions showed that the first five principal components had Eigen values greater than one, and cumulatively accounted for 72% of the variation. Characterization based on quantitative and qualitative traits enabled separation of accessions into various groups representing landraces with distinct characters.

Keywords

Common Bean, Pole-Type, North-East India, Landraces, Principal Components, Morphological Characterization.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ali, M. and Kushwaha, B.L. 1987. Cultivation of rabi rajmah in plains. Indian Farming, 31:20-23
  • Badenes, M.L., Martý´nez-Calvo, J. and Lla´cer, G. 1998. Analysis of apricot germplasm from the European eco-geographical group. Euphytica, 102:93-99
  • Beebe, S., Gonzalez, A.V. and Rengifo, J. 2000. Research on trace minerals in the Common bean. Food Nutr. Bull., 21:387-391
  • Beyene, T.M. 2013. Morpho-agronomical characterization of taro (Colocasia esculenta) accessions in Ethiopia. Plant, 1:1-9
  • Bouis, H.E. 2003. Micronutrient fortification of plants through plant breeding: Can it improve nutrition in man at low cost? Procs. Nutr. Soc., 62:403-411
  • Broughton, W.J., Hernandez, G., Blair, M.W., Beebe, S.E., Gepts, P. and Vanderleyden, J. 2003. Beans (Phaseolus spp.): Model food legumes. Plant Soil, 252:55-128
  • Díaz-Batalla, L., Widholm, J.M., Fahey, G.C. Jr., CastañoTostado, E. and Paredes-López, O. 2006. Chemical components with health implications in wild and cultivated Mexican Common bean seeds (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Agril. Food Chem., 54:2045-2052
  • Duke, J.A. 1981. Handbook of World Economic Importance. USDA, Beltsville, Maryland, Plenum Press, New York and London
  • Harlan, J.R. 1976. Our vanishing genetic resources. Science, 188:618-621
  • Iezzoni, A.F. and Pritts, M.P. 1991. Applications of principal components analysis to horticultural research. Hort. Sci., 26:334-338
  • International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR). 1982. Phaseolus vulgaris descriptor list. Secretariat, Rome, Italy
  • Kumar, V., Sharma, S., Sharma, A.K., Kumar, M., Sharma, S., Malik, S., Singh, K.P., Sanger, R.S. and Bhat, K.V. 2008. Genetic diversity in Indian Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants, 14:383-387
  • Leguizamo´n, J. and Badenes, M.L. 2003. Multivariate analysis as a tool for germplasm studies: example of analysis of loquat germplasm data. Acta Hort., 606:29-35
  • Mars, M. and Marrakchi, M. 1999. Diversity of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) germplasm in Tunisia. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 46:461-467
  • Miko, I. 2008. Genetic dominance: genotype-phenotype relationships. Nature Education, 1:1-12
  • Okii, D., Tukamuhabwa, P., Odong, T., Namayanja, A., Mukabaranga, J., Paparu, P. and Gepts, P. 2014. Morphological diversity of tropical Common bean germplasm. Afr. Crop Sci. J., 22:59-67
  • Pe´rez-Gonza´lez, S. 1992. Associations among morphological and phenological characters representing apricot germplasm in Central Mexico. J. Amer. Soc. Hortl. Sci., 117:486-490
  • Singh, S.P. 1982. A key for identification of different growth habits of frijol, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Annual Report, Bean Improvement Cooperative, U.S.A., 25:92-95
  • Singh, S.P., Gepts, P. and Debouck, D.G. 1991a. Races of Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ. Bot., 45:379-396
  • Singh, S.P., Gutierrez, J., Molina, A., Urrea, C. and Gepts, P. 1991b. Genetic diversity in cultivated Common bean. II. Marker-based analysis of morphological and agronomic traits. Crop Sci., 31:23-29
  • Stoilova, T., Pereira, G. and Tavares-De-sousa, M. 2013. Morphological characterization of a small Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) collection under different environments. J. Centr. Europ. Agr., 14:1-11

Abstract Views: 180

PDF Views: 110




  • Morpho-Agronomic Diversity in Pole-Type Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Landraces from Lushai Hills of North-East India

Abstract Views: 180  |  PDF Views: 110

Authors

S. K. Dutta
ICAR-RC NEH Region, Mizoram Centre, Kolasib - 796 081, India
S. B. Singh
ICAR-RC NEH Region, Mizoram Centre, Kolasib - 796 081, India
T. Boopathi
ICAR-RC NEH Region, Mizoram Centre, Kolasib - 796 081, India
A. R. Singh
ICAR-RC NEH Region, Mizoram Centre, Kolasib - 796 081, India
Y. Ramakrishna
ICAR-RC NEH Region, Mizoram Centre, Kolasib - 796 081, India

Abstract


The present study was based on morphological and agronomical characterization of 23 pole-type common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces collected from Lushai hills of North-East India. Extensive variation in plant and seed traits was found in 16 morphological and agronomical characters. Cluster analysis based on Euclidean distance grouped the genotypes into five main branches, reflecting their growth type and reproductive traits. Significant positive or negative correlation was observed among important traits. Principal component analysis was used for assessing patterns of variation by accounting for all the 10 quantitative and six qualitative variables together. Ordination among accessions showed that the first five principal components had Eigen values greater than one, and cumulatively accounted for 72% of the variation. Characterization based on quantitative and qualitative traits enabled separation of accessions into various groups representing landraces with distinct characters.

Keywords


Common Bean, Pole-Type, North-East India, Landraces, Principal Components, Morphological Characterization.

References