Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Genetic Variation, Association of Characters, and their Contributions for Improvement in Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum Sendt.)


Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, India
 

Forty six genotypes of bell pepper were evaluated during the summer rainy season of 2015 at CSKHPKV, Palampur to study the extent of genetic variability, determine the association between different characters, understand the direct and indirect effects of component traits on marketable fruit yield, and identify desirable genotypes. Sufficient genetic variability was observed for all horticultural traits studied; that is, days to 50 per cent flowering, days to first picking, plant height, primary branches per plant, harvest duration, fruit length, fruit width, pericarp thickness, lobes per fruit, average fruit weight, fruit yield per plant, fruits per plant, marketable fruit yield per plant and marketable fruits per plant. On the basis of mean performance, the progenies P-30, P-39 P-33, P-11 and P-28 were the highest yielder. The phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) indicated higher values than genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for all the traits, indicating close association between phenotype and genotype. High heritability estimates along with high genetic advance were recorded for average fruit weight, fruit yield per plant and marketable fruit yield per plant indicating the role of additive gene action for their inheritance. Harvest duration and fruit width had high heritability estimates along with low genetic advance, indicating non-additive gene activity, and these could be improved through hybridization The maximum direct effect on marketable fruit yield per plant was exhibited by marketable fruits per plant, average fruit weight and fruit width, whereas days to 50 per cent flowering and marketable fruits per plant had negative direct effects. Adequate genetic variability was present within bell pepper germplasm to aflow breeding improvement of marketable yield.

Keywords

Capsicum annuum var. grossum, Bell Pepper, Variability, Heritability, Genetic Advance, Correlations, Path Analysis.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Afroza B, Khan SH, Mushtaq F, Hussain K and Nabi A. 2013. Variability and correlation studies in sweet pepper {Capsicum annuum L.). Progressive Horticulture 45:210-213.
  • Ahmed N, Singh SR, Lai S and Mir KA. 2012. Genetic variability in bell pepper {Capsicum annuum L.) under high altitude environment. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 25: 304-306.
  • Al-jibouri HA, Millar PA and Robinson HF. 1958. Genotypic and environmental variances and co-variances in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin. Agronomy Journal 50: 633-636.
  • Board JE, Kang MS and Harville. 1997. Path analysis identify indirect selection criteria for yield of late planted soyabean. Crop Science 45:879-884.
  • Burton GW and DeVaneehd. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescue {Fescue arundinaceae) from replicated clonal material. Agronomy Journal 54:478-481.
  • Cebula S, Jakubas A, SekaraA, KaliszAandPohlA. 2015. The relationship between morphological features and nutritive value of sweet pepper fmits. Acta Scientiarium Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 14:79-91.
  • Dewey DR and Lu KH. 1959. A correlation and path analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal 51:515518.
  • Johnson HW, Robinson HF and Comstock RE. 1955. Estimate of genetic and environmental variability in Soybean. Agronomy Journal 47:314-318.
  • Kang MS. 1994. Apphed quantitative genetics. MS Kang Publishers, Baton Rouge, La.
  • Kumari S. 2013. Genetic variability studies in bell pepper {Capsicum annuum L.). The Asian Journal ofHorticulture 8:280-284.
  • Maga TJ, Uguru MI and Ogbonna PE. 2013. Variability and association studies on yield and yield characteristics in aromatic nsukka yellow pepper. International Journal of Plant Breeding 7:90-95.
  • Muhammad F, Ramzan A, Chattha MR, Qasim U, Nawab NN and Hidyatullah. 2015. Studies on performance of bell pepper hybrids under plastic polytunnel. Science and Technology 34:155-157.
  • Naik KB, SrideviO, Salimath PM and Patil AA. 2010. Genetic architecture and trait relationship in segregating population of sweet pepper {Capsicum annuum) under shade house conditions. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80:10-14.
  • Naik KB, Sridevi O and Salimath PM.2014. Genetic analysis of quantitative and qualitative characters in segregating population of sweet pepper {Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum Sendt.) under shade house conditions. Bio information letter 11:474-480.
  • Pandey V, Chura A, Arya MC and Ahmed Z. 2013. Variability parameter for quantitative and qualitative traits in sweet pepper in mid hills of Western Himalaya. Vegetable Science 40:3739.
  • Panse VG and Sukhatme PV. 1984. Statistical Methods fo r Agricultural Workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi. p359.
  • Paola BA, Dutra IP, Moulin MM, Santos JO and Santos A C .2016. Morphological characterization and analysis of genetic variability among pepper accessions Cienc Rural 46:7-10.
  • Rana M, Sharma R, Sharma P, Kumar S, Kumar D and Dogra RK. 2015. Correlation and pathcoefficient analysis for yield and its contributing traits in Capsicum {Capsicum annuum. L.). International Journal of Farm Sciences 52:66-73.
  • Sasu L, Giancarla V, Ciulca S, CA and Gabriela G. 2013. Studies regarding correlations between the main morphological traits in a collection of bell pepper {Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum) local landraces. Journal o f Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology 17:285-289.
  • Sharma VK, Semwal CS and Uniyal SP.2009. Genetic variability and character association analysis in bell pepper under rainfed mid hills situation of Uttarakhand. Annals of Horticulture 2:177-183.
  • Sharma VK, Semwal CS and Uniyal SP.2010. Genetic variability and character association analysis in bell pepper {Capsicum annuum L.). Journal ofHorticulture andForestry 2:58-65.
  • Sood S, Sood R, Sagar V and Sharma KC. 2009. Genetic variation and association analysis for fruit yield, agronomic and quality characters in bell pepper. International Journal of Vegetable Science 15:272-284.
  • Sood S, Bindal A, Sharma A and Chaudhary DR. 2007. G enetic a rc h ite c tu re and tra it relationship in bell pepper under sub-temperate conditions o f North-Western Himalayas. Indian Journal ofHorticulture 64:169-174.
  • Sood S, Kumar N, Chandel KS and Sharma R 2011. Determination o f genetic variation for morphological and yield traits in bell pepper {Capsicum annum var. grossum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81:590-594.
  • Thakur KS, Kashyap S and Mehta DK. 2013. Correlation studies in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Green Farming 4:634-636.

Abstract Views: 228

PDF Views: 1




  • Genetic Variation, Association of Characters, and their Contributions for Improvement in Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum Sendt.)

Abstract Views: 228  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Vibhuti Sharma
Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, India
Sonia Sood
Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, India
V. K. Sood
Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, India
Yudhvir Singh
Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, India

Abstract


Forty six genotypes of bell pepper were evaluated during the summer rainy season of 2015 at CSKHPKV, Palampur to study the extent of genetic variability, determine the association between different characters, understand the direct and indirect effects of component traits on marketable fruit yield, and identify desirable genotypes. Sufficient genetic variability was observed for all horticultural traits studied; that is, days to 50 per cent flowering, days to first picking, plant height, primary branches per plant, harvest duration, fruit length, fruit width, pericarp thickness, lobes per fruit, average fruit weight, fruit yield per plant, fruits per plant, marketable fruit yield per plant and marketable fruits per plant. On the basis of mean performance, the progenies P-30, P-39 P-33, P-11 and P-28 were the highest yielder. The phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) indicated higher values than genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for all the traits, indicating close association between phenotype and genotype. High heritability estimates along with high genetic advance were recorded for average fruit weight, fruit yield per plant and marketable fruit yield per plant indicating the role of additive gene action for their inheritance. Harvest duration and fruit width had high heritability estimates along with low genetic advance, indicating non-additive gene activity, and these could be improved through hybridization The maximum direct effect on marketable fruit yield per plant was exhibited by marketable fruits per plant, average fruit weight and fruit width, whereas days to 50 per cent flowering and marketable fruits per plant had negative direct effects. Adequate genetic variability was present within bell pepper germplasm to aflow breeding improvement of marketable yield.

Keywords


Capsicum annuum var. grossum, Bell Pepper, Variability, Heritability, Genetic Advance, Correlations, Path Analysis.

References