Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of Physical, Nutritional and Sensory Characteristics of Cookies Developed with Bio-Fortified Pearl Millet


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Aurangabad (M.S.), India
2 Food Science and Technology, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Aurangabad (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study examines the effect of pearl millet varieties bio-fortified AHB 1200 Fe and MRB (Aurangabad Hybrid Bajra and Maharashtra Rabi Bajra, respectively) as a replacement of whole wheat flour at various levels on quality of cookies. For improving nutritional composition germination treatment was given to both varieties. Before making cookies germination effect was analyses on two varieties of pear millet for proximate, mineral and on anti-nutritional. This raw material analysis revealed that protein was increased and ash, fat, fibre is decreased but availability of minerals was increased due to decreasing level of anti-nutritional upto 40-45 per cent. Enriched cookies were produced by the ratio of whole wheat to pearl millet was 100:00, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40 and 50:50. Cookies were prepared by four types of pearl millet flour (Two varieties and one treatment with wheat flour using these five ratios. From each type of flour one sample was selected on the basis of sensory analysis. And these selected four types of cookies were evaluated for chemically and physical characteristics. Physical characteristics of cookies shows that the diameter and spread ratio is increased slightly as compare to control but did not very markedly. Germination is lightly affected on physical properties but varieties were not markedly affecting. The overall results indicated that the positive response of pearl millet flour substitution to whole wheat flour upto 30 and 40 per cent in preparation of cookies germinated and without germinated, respectively.

Keywords

Anti-Nutritional, Cookies, Germination, Mineral, Pearl Millet.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abdalla, A.A., Tinay, E.L., Mohamed, B.E. and Abdalla, A.H. (1984). Proximate composition, starch, phytate and mineral contents of 10 pearl millet genotypes. Food Chemistry, 63 (2) : 243-246.
  • Afify, AE-M.M.R., El-Beltagi, H.S. Abd E.L-Salam, S.M. and Omran, A.A. (2011).Bioavailability of iron, zinc, phytate and phytase activity during soaking and germination of white sorghum varieties. PLoS ONE, 6(10): e25512. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025512.
  • Akinwande, B.A., Ade-Omowaye, B.I.O., Olaniyan, S.A. and Akintaro, O.O. (2008). Quality evaluation of ginger-flavoured soy-cassava biscuit. Nutr. & Food Sci., 38 (5) : 473-481.
  • Anozie, G.O., China, M.A. and Beleya, E.A. (2014). Sensory evaluation and proximate composition of snacks produced from composite flour of Discorea alata and Telfaira occidentails seed flours. J. Home Econ. Res.,20: 100-108.
  • AOAC (2005).Official method of analysis, 18thEd. Association of Analytical Chemist, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
  • Ayo, J.A., Ayo, V.A., Nkama, I. and Adewori, R. (2007). Physico-chemical, in vitro digestibility and organoleptic evaluation of “Acha” wheat biscuits supplemented with soyabean flour. Nigeria Food J., 25 (1) : 77-89.
  • Borade, V. P., Kadam, Sercan and Salunkhe, Kirti (1984). Changes in phytate phosphorus and minerals during germination and cooking of horse gram and moth bean. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 34(2) :151- 157 · DOI: 10.1007/BF01094843.
  • Charyulu, D. Kumara, Shyam, D Moses, Bantilan, Cynthia, Borikar, S.T., Gupta, S.K. and Rai, K.N. (2016). Pearl millet technology adoption and impact study in Maharashtra. Research Report 71. Patancheru (Telangana) India International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 76 pp. ISBN 978-92-9066-581-6.
  • Dayakar, R. B., Bhaskarachary, K., Arlene Christina, G.D., Sudha Devi, G. and Vilas, Tonapi A. (2017).Nutritional and health benefits of millet. ICAR- Indian Institute of Millet Research.
  • Devi, P. B., Vijayabharathi, R., Sathyabhama, S, Malleshi, N.G. and Priyadarsini, V. B. (2011). Health benefits of finger millet polyphenols and dietary fibre : A review. J.Food Sci. & Technol., 51(6):1021-1040.
  • FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization) (1995). Sorghum and millets in human nutrition. Rome, Italy: FAO.
  • Fasasi, O.S., Eleyinmi, A.F., Fasasi, A.R. and Karim, O.R. (2004). Chemical properties of raw and processed breadfruit seed flour. Internat. J, Food Agric. &Environ., 2 (1): 65-68.
  • Haug, Wolfgang and Lantzsch, Hans-Joachim (1983). Sensitive method for the rapid determination of phytate in cereals and cereal products. J. Sci. Food & Agric., 34 (12): 1-42.
  • Hooda, S. and Jood, S. (2005). Organoleptic and nutritional evaluation of wheat biscuits supplemented with untreated and treated fenugreek flour. Food Chem., 90 : 427-435.
  • Lasekan, O.O. (1996). Effectof germination on -amylase activities and rheological properties of sorghum (Sorghum biocolar) and acha (Digitaria exilis) grain. J. Food Sci. Technol., 33: 329-331.
  • Ranganna, S. (2000). Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products, 3rd Ed. Tata and McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, India.
  • Rao, P.U. and Deosthale, Y.G. (1982).Tannin contents of pulses: Varietal differences and effect of cooking and germination. J. Sci. Food & Agric., 33: 1013–1016.
  • Sandberg, A.S. and Andlid, T. (2002).Phytogenic and microbial phytases in human nutrition. Internat. J. Food Sci. & Technol., 37(7): 823-833.
  • Singh, Upka and Jambunathan, R. (1981). Studies on desi and Kabull chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Cultivars: Levels of protease inhibitors, levels of polyphenolic compounds and in vitro protein digestibility. J. Food Sci., 46 (5) : 1364 -1367 ·
  • Tandan, H.L.S. (2017).Method of analysisof soil, plants, water, fertilizers and organic manures. ISBN: 81-85116-55-5.
  • Taylor, J.R.N. (2004). Millet: pearl. Encyclopedia of Grain Science. 2: 253-261/doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-765490-9/00097-5.
  • UNICEF (2015). Nutridash 2014: Global report. New York: UNICEF.
  • Wang, N., Lewis, M.J., Brennann, J.G. and Westby, A. (1997). Effect of processing methods on nutrients and anti-nutritional factors in cowpea. Food Chem., 58 : 59-68.
  • Zydenbos, S., Humphrey-Taylor, V. and Wrigley, C. (2004). Cookies, biscuits and crackers/the diversity of products. Elsevier, pp.313-317.

Abstract Views: 234

PDF Views: 1




  • Evaluation of Physical, Nutritional and Sensory Characteristics of Cookies Developed with Bio-Fortified Pearl Millet

Abstract Views: 234  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Priti G. Kale
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Aurangabad (M.S.), India
K. P. Babar
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Aurangabad (M.S.), India
D. T. Bornare
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Aurangabad (M.S.), India
P. R. Vairagar
Food Science and Technology, Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Aurangabad (M.S.), India

Abstract


This study examines the effect of pearl millet varieties bio-fortified AHB 1200 Fe and MRB (Aurangabad Hybrid Bajra and Maharashtra Rabi Bajra, respectively) as a replacement of whole wheat flour at various levels on quality of cookies. For improving nutritional composition germination treatment was given to both varieties. Before making cookies germination effect was analyses on two varieties of pear millet for proximate, mineral and on anti-nutritional. This raw material analysis revealed that protein was increased and ash, fat, fibre is decreased but availability of minerals was increased due to decreasing level of anti-nutritional upto 40-45 per cent. Enriched cookies were produced by the ratio of whole wheat to pearl millet was 100:00, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40 and 50:50. Cookies were prepared by four types of pearl millet flour (Two varieties and one treatment with wheat flour using these five ratios. From each type of flour one sample was selected on the basis of sensory analysis. And these selected four types of cookies were evaluated for chemically and physical characteristics. Physical characteristics of cookies shows that the diameter and spread ratio is increased slightly as compare to control but did not very markedly. Germination is lightly affected on physical properties but varieties were not markedly affecting. The overall results indicated that the positive response of pearl millet flour substitution to whole wheat flour upto 30 and 40 per cent in preparation of cookies germinated and without germinated, respectively.

Keywords


Anti-Nutritional, Cookies, Germination, Mineral, Pearl Millet.

References