Author Details

Scroll

Refine your search

Collections

Medical Collection

Co-Authors

Journals

Dental Journal of Advance Studies

Year

2015
2014

Authors

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All

Chaudhary, Devendra

Missed Canals can never be Missed- CT in Endodontics: A Series of Case Reports

Abstract Views :189 | PDF Views:96

Authors

Devendra Chaudhary ¹, Niti Shah ², Abhishek Bansal ³, Navneet Kukreja ³, Hitesh Nagarth ³

Affiliations
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Maharaja Ganga Singh Denal College, Rajasthan, IN
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MM College of Dental Sciences & Research Haryana, IN
3 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MM College of Dental Sciences & Research, Haryana, IN

Source

Dental Journal of Advance Studies, Vol 3, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 118-123

Abstract

Aberrations in the ischolar_main canal anatomy are a commonly occurring phenomenon.Athorough knowledge of the basic ischolar_main canal anatomy and its variations is necessary for successful completion of the endodontic treatment. The maxillary molars has fascinated researchers and clinicians for a variety of reasons. Endodontically, these are the most misunderstood teeth, and presents a variety of considerations for the treating practitioner. This case report presents the endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with five ischolar_mains and five canals and another case of maxillary third molar with four canals. The clinical detection of the five canals was made using loupes and confirmed using computed tomography (CT) scanning. This report serves to remind clinicians that such anatomical variations should be taken into account during endodontic treatment of the maxillary molars.

Keywords

Maxillary First Molar, Five Root Canals, Maxillary Third Molar ,CTScan.

Full Text

References

Maggiore F, Jou YT, Kim S.Asix canal maxillary first molar: case report. Int Endod J 2002; 35:486-491.

Holderrieth S, Gernhardt CR. Maxillary Molars With Morphologic Variations of the Palatal Root Canals: A Report of Four Cases. J Endod 2009 ;35(7):1060-65.

Vertucci F, James E, Haddix, Britto L. Tooth morphology and Access cavity preparation. In, Cohen S, Hargreaves K(ed). Pathways of the Pulp, 8th edition. New Delhi, Elsevier, 1998;148-232.

Pécora JD,Woelfel JB, Sousa Neto MD, Issa EP. Morphology study of the maxillary molars part II: internal anatomy. Braz Endod J 1992; 3: 53–7.

Carlsen O. Dental morphology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard 1987.

Kottor J, Velmurugan N, Surendran N. Endodontic management of maxillary first molar with eight ischolar_main canal systems evaluated using Cone Beam Computed Tomography scanning: a case report. J Endod 2011;37:715-719.

Gray R. The Maxillary first molar. In: Bjomdal A, Skidmore E, eds. Anatomy and morphology of the human teeth. Iowa City: University of Iowa College of Dentistry 1983; 31-40.

Acosta Vigouroux SA, Trugeda Bosaans SA. Anatomy of the pulp chamber floor of the permanent maxillary first molars. J Endod 1978;4:214-219.

Zheng Q, Wang Y, Zhou X, Wang Q, Zheng G, Huang D. A Cone Beam Computed Tomography study of Maxillary first permanent molar ischolar_main and canal morphology in a Chinese population. J Endod 2010; 36 :1480-1484.

Martinez-Berna A, Ruiz-Badanelli P. Maxillary first molars with six canals. J Endod 1983;9:375-381.

Cosic J ,Galic N, Njemirovskij V, Vodanovic M. Root Canal Anatomy of Third Molars. PEF IADR. http://iadr.confen.com 12. Seidberg BH, Altman M, Guttuso J. Frequency of two mesiobuccal ischolar_main canals in maxillary permanent first molars. J AmDentAssoc 1973;87:852-856.

Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW, Pilgram TK, Shrout MK. Quantitative evaluation of digital dental radiograph imaging systems. Oral Surg OralMedOral Pathol 1990;70:661– 668.

Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of ischolar_main canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30:559–567.

Tachibana H, Matsumoto K. Applicability of X-Ray computerized tomography in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990 ; 6 :16 –20.

Johal S. Unusual maxillary first molar with 2 palatal canals within a single ischolar_main: a case report. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67:211–214.

Smadi L, KhraisatA. Detection of a second mesiobuccal canal in the mesiobuccal ischolar_mains of maxillary first molar teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103:77–81.

Filho FB, Zaitter S, Haragushiku GA, de Campos EA, Abuabara A, Correr GM. Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod 2009; 35: 337–342.

Chen IP, Karabucak B. Conventional and surgical endodontic retreatment of a maxillary first molar: unusual anatomy. J Endod 2006;32: 228–230.

MatherneRP,Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC,Tira D. Use of conebeam computed tomography to identify ischolar_main canal systems in vitro. J Endod 2008;34:87–89.

Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and ischolar_main canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review J Endod 2006;32:813– 821.

Holderrieth S, Gernhardt CR. Maxillary molars with morphologic variations of the palatal ischolar_main canals: a report of four cases. J Endod 2009; 35:1060–1065.

Patel S, DawoodA, Whaites E.Newdimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J 2009; 42 : 447–62.

Robinson S, Czerny C, Gahleitner A. Dental CT evaluation of mandibular first premolar ischolar_main configurations and canal variations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:328–32.

Farman AG. ALARA still applies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:395–7.

Scarfe WC. Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: evolutions and emerging revolutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100: S 75–96.

Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 508–13.

Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34:145–9.

Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 219–26.

Brooks SL. Effective Dose of Two Cone-Beam CT Scanners: I-CAT and NewTom 3G. Quarterly Publication of the American Association of Dental Maxillofacial Radiographic Technicians. Winter 2005.

"Vertical Root Fracture"-A Dilemma Revisited

Abstract Views :204 | PDF Views:99

Authors

Navneet Kukreja ¹, Disha Agarwal ¹, Abhishek Bansal ¹, Devendra Chaudhary ², Urvashi Kukreja ³, Sangam Mittal ¹

Affiliations
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MM College of Dental Sciences & Research, Haryana, IN
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College, Rajasthan, IN
3 Department of Prosthodontics, MM College of Dental Sciences & Research, Haryana, IN

Source

Dental Journal of Advance Studies, Vol 3, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 1-6

Abstract

Diagnosis of vertical ischolar_main fracture in an endodontically treated tooth presents with various difficulties. The diagnosis of such a fracture is a challenge to the clinician since it is based on subjective parameters. There are, however, many specific clinical and radiographical signs which, when present, can alert clinicians to the existence of such a fracture. Various methods to clinically diagnose vertical ischolar_main fracture include conventional methods such as illumination, periodontal probing, staining, direct visual examination and newer techniques such as cone beam computed tomography, optical coherence tomography. Themanagement of a vertical ischolar_main fracture has always been considered a difficult task for the endodontist. This article provides an insight into the various methods of diagnosis and treatment strategies for the vertical ischolar_main fracture.

Keywords

Diagnosis, Etiology,Vertical Root Fracture.

Full Text

Sword of Endodontist:A Review

Abstract Views :247 | PDF Views:96

Authors

Sangam Mittal ¹, Navneet Kukreja ¹, Devendra Chaudhary ², Abhishek Bansal ¹, Jyoti Bansal ¹, Disha Agarwal ¹

Affiliations
1 MM College of Dental Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana, IN
2 Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College, Ganga Nagar, Rajasthan, IN

Source

Dental Journal of Advance Studies, Vol 2, No 3 (2014), Pagination: 118-124

Abstract

The last decade has been witness to phenomenal growth in endodontic technology. The introduction of these new technologies has resulted in endodontics becoming easier, faster and most importantly, better. NiTi alloys overall are softer than stainless steel, are not heat treatable, have a low modulus of elasticity (about one fourth to one fifth that of stainless steel) but a greater strength, are tougher and more resilient, and show shape memory and superelasticity. The latter two properties are the main reasons why NiTi alloys have succeeded in endodontics. The purpose of this article is to review the design features of different rotary instruments used for pulp space preparation. Important mechanical features include the variability of taper, rake angle, crosssectional geometry, tip configuration, design of blades, helical angle and pitch. These design features influence flexibility, cutting efficiency and safety. In this review, design features of commonly used NiTi rotary systems are summarized.

Keywords

Helical Angle, Nickel Titanium Alloys, Rotary Endodontics, Rake Angle, Taper.

Username
Password
Remember me