Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration with Different Surface Protectors - An In-Vitro Study


Affiliations
1 Department of Pedodontics, & Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College, Nagpur, India
2 Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, NIMS Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
3 Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bangalore, India
4 Department of Pedodontics, Index Dental College, Indore, India
5 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Hitkarni Dental College, Jabalpur, India
6 Department of Prosthodontics and Maxillofacial Prosthesis, Rishiraj College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, India
 

Aim:All the restorative material whatsoever introduced till-date have an inherent disadvantage of microleakage measurable different grades. The present study comparatively evaluates the micro-leakage of glass ionomer restoration with different surface protection methods. Methodology: 36 premolars were obtained without any cracks or restorations for the study.Teeth were stored in distilled water containing thymol crystals till the beginning of the study. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups based on surface protectors used. Group I is GC Fuji Varnish , Group II is vaseline and Group III is G-Coat plus along with GIC restoration. Class V cavities were prepared of dimensions mesio-distal width of 3 mm, occluso-gingival length of 2 mm, and a depth of 1.5mmon buccal and lingual surfaces with a high-speed hand-piece with airwater spray. Results: Kruskal-Wallis test was applied and Vaseline group showed significantly less microleakage compared to G-Coat plus i.e. G-Coat plus exhibited significantly higher microleakage compared to other groups.Conclusion: Evaluation of micro-leakage of glass ionomer cements using various surface protecting agents ,Vaseline was considered the best surface protecting agent maintaining the water balance and showing no micro-leakage.

Keywords

Glass Ionomer Restoration, Micro-Leakage, Surface Protection.
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 384

PDF Views: 104




  • A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restoration with Different Surface Protectors - An In-Vitro Study

Abstract Views: 384  |  PDF Views: 104

Authors

Nupur Ninawe
Department of Pedodontics, & Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College, Nagpur, India
Ullal Anand Nayak
Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, NIMS Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Priya Nagar
Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bangalore, India
Vishal Khandelwal
Department of Pedodontics, Index Dental College, Indore, India
Suyash Jain
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Hitkarni Dental College, Jabalpur, India
Ambika Shrivastava Gupta
Department of Prosthodontics and Maxillofacial Prosthesis, Rishiraj College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, India

Abstract


Aim:All the restorative material whatsoever introduced till-date have an inherent disadvantage of microleakage measurable different grades. The present study comparatively evaluates the micro-leakage of glass ionomer restoration with different surface protection methods. Methodology: 36 premolars were obtained without any cracks or restorations for the study.Teeth were stored in distilled water containing thymol crystals till the beginning of the study. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups based on surface protectors used. Group I is GC Fuji Varnish , Group II is vaseline and Group III is G-Coat plus along with GIC restoration. Class V cavities were prepared of dimensions mesio-distal width of 3 mm, occluso-gingival length of 2 mm, and a depth of 1.5mmon buccal and lingual surfaces with a high-speed hand-piece with airwater spray. Results: Kruskal-Wallis test was applied and Vaseline group showed significantly less microleakage compared to G-Coat plus i.e. G-Coat plus exhibited significantly higher microleakage compared to other groups.Conclusion: Evaluation of micro-leakage of glass ionomer cements using various surface protecting agents ,Vaseline was considered the best surface protecting agent maintaining the water balance and showing no micro-leakage.

Keywords


Glass Ionomer Restoration, Micro-Leakage, Surface Protection.