Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparison of the Efficacy Ofa Primerless Orthodontic Bonding Adhesive as Compared to Conventional Materials: an Invitro Study


Affiliations
1 Haryana, India
2 Army College of Dental Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, India
 

Introduction: Light cured composite resins have become the method of choice in orthodontic bonding procedures worldwide. In recent years, a new primerless orthodontic bonding composite, Heloisit® with good bond strength, fluoride release and an advantage of not requiring use of a primer has been introduced. Aims of the study: To compare the bonding characteristics of commonly available self and light cured adhesives with the Heliosit ®primerless bonding system. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty extracted human premolar teeth were mounted on similar sized aluminium blocks filled with acrylic resin and were divided into four groups of thirty teeth each. All teeth were bonded with four different bonding systems Group i) Light Cured Primerless orthodontic Composite (Heliosit®, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Group ii) Light Cured Composite Resin (Transbond XT®, 3MUnitek), Group iii) Light Cured GIC (GC Fuji Ortho LC®, GC Corp.), Group iv) Self Cured Composite Resin (Rely-A-Bond®, Reliance, Inc., Illinois, USA) using metallic premolar first premolar brackets (0.022" Ortho Organizers). These were evaluated for shear bond strength using an Instron testing machine. Surface characteristics after debonding were studied under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and evaluated using the adhesive remnant index (AR Index). Results: Shear bond strength (SBS) of primerless orthodontic light cured Heliosit® composite was clinically significant and adequate for clinical use. It lies intermediate to Transbond XT light-cured composite and Light Cured GIC. The least bond strength was shown by Rely-a-Bond® self-cured composite resin. Conclusions: Heliosit® light cured primerless orthodontic composite can be used for everyday clinical use due to its ideal characteristics of sufficient bond strength and reduced chances of enamel damage at debonding.Additionally, it is primerless and saves valuable clinical time.

Keywords

Adhesives, SEM, SBS, ARIndex.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849-53.
  • E. Dianne Rekow, Orthodontic Biomaterials Semin Orthod Vol3,No.3 1997:pp 145-146.
  • Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment.Am J Orthod 1984; 85:333-340.
  • Vasudevan SD, Sundareswaran S. Bonding characteristics of improved low viscosity adhesives for orthodontic use. J Ind Orthod Soci 2014; 48(4): 262-266.
  • Ryou DB, Park HS, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Use of flowable composite for orthodontic bracket bonding. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(6): 1105-1109.
  • Tecco S, Traini T, Caputi S, Festa F, de Luca V, D' Attilio M. A new one-step dental flowable composite for orthodontic use: an In vitro bond strength study. Angle Orthod 2005; 75(4) 672-677.
  • Usyal T, Sari Z, Demir A. Are the flowable composite suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding? Angle Orthod 2004;74(5): 697-702.
  • Reynolds I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod.1976; 3:91-5.
  • Reynolds I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod.1975; 2:171-8.
  • Aasrum, N et al. Tensile bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a fluoride-releasing light-curing adhesive. An in vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod 1993;104:48-50.
  • Martin G. et al. Shear bond strength of zinc oxide-polyvinyl on brackets.AmJ Orthod 1994; 106:615-20.

Abstract Views: 359

PDF Views: 98




  • A Comparison of the Efficacy Ofa Primerless Orthodontic Bonding Adhesive as Compared to Conventional Materials: an Invitro Study

Abstract Views: 359  |  PDF Views: 98

Authors

Yashpal
Haryana, India
Prasad Chitra
Army College of Dental Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract


Introduction: Light cured composite resins have become the method of choice in orthodontic bonding procedures worldwide. In recent years, a new primerless orthodontic bonding composite, Heloisit® with good bond strength, fluoride release and an advantage of not requiring use of a primer has been introduced. Aims of the study: To compare the bonding characteristics of commonly available self and light cured adhesives with the Heliosit ®primerless bonding system. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty extracted human premolar teeth were mounted on similar sized aluminium blocks filled with acrylic resin and were divided into four groups of thirty teeth each. All teeth were bonded with four different bonding systems Group i) Light Cured Primerless orthodontic Composite (Heliosit®, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Group ii) Light Cured Composite Resin (Transbond XT®, 3MUnitek), Group iii) Light Cured GIC (GC Fuji Ortho LC®, GC Corp.), Group iv) Self Cured Composite Resin (Rely-A-Bond®, Reliance, Inc., Illinois, USA) using metallic premolar first premolar brackets (0.022" Ortho Organizers). These were evaluated for shear bond strength using an Instron testing machine. Surface characteristics after debonding were studied under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and evaluated using the adhesive remnant index (AR Index). Results: Shear bond strength (SBS) of primerless orthodontic light cured Heliosit® composite was clinically significant and adequate for clinical use. It lies intermediate to Transbond XT light-cured composite and Light Cured GIC. The least bond strength was shown by Rely-a-Bond® self-cured composite resin. Conclusions: Heliosit® light cured primerless orthodontic composite can be used for everyday clinical use due to its ideal characteristics of sufficient bond strength and reduced chances of enamel damage at debonding.Additionally, it is primerless and saves valuable clinical time.

Keywords


Adhesives, SEM, SBS, ARIndex.

References