Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Srivastava, Shivendra Kumar
- Agricultural Biotechnology and Crop Productivity: Macro-Level Evidences on Contribution of Bt Cotton in India
Abstract Views :911 |
PDF Views:103
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 South Dakota State University, Brookings SD 57007, US
1 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 South Dakota State University, Brookings SD 57007, US
Source
Current Science, Vol 110, No 3 (2016), Pagination: 311-319Abstract
While farm-level empirical studies demonstrate the contribution of Bt technology in increasing crop productivity, there are still questions about its contribution to long-term growth in productivity at the macro-level. Our study examines major technological and seed policy breakthroughs relevant for the cotton crop, and reviews their impact on overall performance of the cotton sector and agricultural biotechnology industry in India. Using state-level panel data on cotton production from all the major cotton-producing zones, we provide empirical evidences on structural change in the cotton yield since the introduction of Bt technology and its impact on long-term growth in productivity at the national level.Keywords
Agricultural Biotechnology, Bt Cotton, Genetic Modification, Macro-Level Productivity.Full Text
References
- James, C., Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013. ISAAA (International Service for Acquisition of Agribiotech Applications) Brief No. 46, Ithaca, New York, 2013.
- Pray, C., Ma, D., Huang, J. and Qiao, F, Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Dev., 2001, 29(5), 813–825.
- Qaim, M., The economics of genetically modified crops. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., 2009, 1, 665–693.
- Subramanian, A. and Qaim, M., The impact of Bt cotton on poor households in rural India. J. Dev. Stud., 2010, 46(2), 295–311.
- Union of Concerned Scientists, Failure to Yield: Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops, UCS Publications, Cambridge, 2009.
- Friends of the Earth, Who Benefits from GM Crops: An Industry Built on Myths, Friends of the Earth International, Amsterdam, 2011.
- Bagla, P., Negative reports on GM crops shake Government’s food agenda. Sci. News Anal., 2012, 337, 789.
- Kolady, D. E. and Herring, R., Regulation of genetically engineered crops in India: implications of policy paralysis for social welfare, competition and innovation. Can. J. Agric. Econ., 2014, doi: 10.1111/cjag.12055.
- DBT, Year-wise list of commercially released varieties of Bt cotton hybrids by GEAC (an electronic publication); http:// dbtbiosafety.nic.in (accessed on 28 January 2015).
- Qaim, M., Bt cotton in India: field trail results and economic projections. World Dev., 2003, 31(12), 2115–2127.
- Padaria, R. N., Singh, B., Padaria, J. C., Meena, M. S. and Pankaj, Farmer participatory assessment of Bt cotton and its socio-economic implications. Indian J. Ext. Educ., 2008, 44(1 & 2), 25–31.
- Subramanian, A. and Qaim, M., Village-wide effects of agricultural biotechnology: the case of Bt cotton in India. World Dev., 2009, 37(1), 256–267.
- Kouser, S. and Qaim, M., Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in small holder agriculture – a panel data analysis. Ecol. Econ., 2011, 70(11), 2105–2113.
- Kiresur, V. R. and Ichangi, M., Socio-economic impact of Bt cotton – a case study of Karnataka. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2011, 24(1), 67–81.
- Kathage, J. and Qaim, M., Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2012, 109(29), 11652–11656.
- Stone, G. D., Field verses farm in Warangal: Bt cotton, higher yields and larger questions. World Dev., 2011, 39(3), 387–398.
- Gruere, G. and Sengupta, D., Bt cotton adoption and farmer suicides in India: an evidence based assessment. J. Dev. Stud., 2011, 47(2), 316–337.
- Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Herren, H. R., Baumgartner, J. and Kenmore, P. E., Deconstructing Indian cotton: Weather, yields, and suicides. Environ. Sci. Eur., 2015, 27, 12; doi:10.1186/ s12302-015-0043-8.
- India Times, Farmer suicides complicated issue: formal finance key, 2105; http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-04-24/ news/61493845_1_rbi-governor-raghuram-rajan-agriculture-sectorloanwaiver.
- Sadanandan, A., Political economy of suicide: financial reforms, credit crunches and farmer suicides in India. J. Dev. Areas, 2014, 48(4), 287–307.
- James, C., Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2012. ISAAA Brief No. 44, Ithaca, New York, 2012.
- Murugkar, M., Ramaswami, B. and Shelar, M., Competition and monopoly in Indian cotton seed market. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2007, XLII(37), 3781–3789.
- Biospectrum-ABLE, Biospectrum top 20: industry insights. A cyber media publication, 2013; http://www.ableindia.in/wp-content/ uploads/2014/03/11th-able-biospectrum-survey-june-2013.pdf
- Singh, N. B., Revolution in Indian cotton. Directorate of Cotton Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Mumbai and National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi, 2009; http://www.ncipm.org.in/NCIPMPDFs/Revolution in Indian Cotton.pdf
- Kururganti, K., Bt cotton and the myth of enhanced yields. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2009, 44(22), 29–33.
- Glover, D., Undying promise: agricultural biotechnology’s propoor narrative, ten years on. STEPS Working Paper No. 15, STEPS Centre, Brighton, 2009.
- Ramasundaram, P. and Vennila, S., A decade of Bt cotton experience in India: pointers for transgenics in pipeline. Curr. Sci., 2013, 104(6), 697–698.
- Pray, C. E. and Ramaswami, B., Liberalization’s impact on the Indian seed industry: competition, research, and impact on farmers. Int. Food Agribus. Manage. Rev., 2001, 2(3/4), 407–420.
- Kolady, D., Spielman, D. J. and Cavalieri, A. J., Intellectual property rights, private investment in research and productivity growth in Indian agriculture: a review of evidence and options. IFPRI discussion paper 01031, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, 2010.
- Pray, C. E. and Nagarajan, L., Innovation and research by private agribusiness in India. IFPRI discussion paper 01181, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, 2012.
- Pray, C. E., Bengali, P. and Ramaswami, B., The cost of biosafety regulations: the Indian experience. Q. J. Int. Agric., 2005, 44, 267–289.
- Lalitha, N., Pray, C. E. and Ramaswami, B., The limits of intellectual property rights: Lessons from the spread of illegal transgenic seeds in India. Discussion paper 08-06, Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi, 2008.
- Kranti, K. R., Bt Cotton: Questions and Answers, Indian Society for Cotton Improvement, Mumbai, 2012.
- Herring, R. J., Reconstructing facts in Bt cotton: why scepticism fails. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2013, XLVIII(33), 63–66.
- Kranti, K. R., Cotton production systems – need for a change in India. Cotton Stat. News, 16 December 2014, pp. 4–7.
- Greene, W. H., Econometric Analysis, Pearson Education Inc, Delhi, 2008, 5th edn.
- Harvest Choice, Rainfall variability and crop yield potential. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC and University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, 2010; http://harvestchoice. org/node/2240
- Food and Nutrition Security: Analytical Fallacies and Way Forward
Abstract Views :181 |
PDF Views:89
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, IN
1 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 120, No 7 (2021), Pagination: 1139-1141Abstract
Food and nutrition security (FNS) being a key priority area in development planning, requires good predictive models for holistic analysis of the concept, representative of the multi-dimensional linkages associated with the complex phenomenon. The present article discusses the conceptual dissents, and the popular proxy measures from which FNS is being most often inferred in practice. We suggest possible integration of the measures within the scope of a multifaceted framework in light of the limitations and potential risks in using them in isolation.Keywords
No Keywords.Full Text
References
- FAO, 2019; http://www.fao.org/3/ca5162en/ca5162en.pdf (accessed on 26 December 2019).
- FAO, 2020; http://www.fao.org/3/ca9692en/online/ca9692en.html#chapter1_1 (accessed on 27 January 2021).
- Paul, S., Vellaichamy, S., Satyapriya and Singh, P., Curr. Sci., 2018, 114, 439– 441.
- Pinstrup-Andersen, P., Food Security, 2009, 1, 5–7.
- NITI Aayog, 2020; https://niti.gov.in/ writereaddata/files/document_publication/Nutrition_Strategy_Booklet.pdf (accessed on 3 February 2021).
- Drèze, J. and Sen, A., Hunger and Public Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989.
- Bhattacharya, A., Pal, B., Mukherjee, S. and Roy, S. K., BMC Public Health, 2019, 19, 1045.
- Maxwell, D., Ahiadeke, C., Levin, C., Armar-Klemesu, M., Zakariah, S. and Lamptey, G. M., Food Policy, 1999, 24, 411–429.
- Chandra, H., Aditya, K., Gupta, S., Guha, S. and Verma, B., Curr. Sci., 2020, 119, 1783–1788.
- Muralikrishnan, L. et al., Indian J. Ext. Educ., 2019, 55, 61–65.
- Sangeetha, V. et al., Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2019, 74, 444–460.
- Vaitla, B., Coates, J., Glaeser, L., Hillbruner, C., Biswal, P. and Maxwell, D., Food Policy, 2017, 68, 193–205.
- Ibok, O. W., Osbahr, H. and Srinivasan, C., Food Policy, 2019, 84, 10–20.
- Coates, J., Swindale, A. and Bilinsky, P., Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for Measurement of Household Food Access: Indicator Guide (v. 3), USAID, Washington, DC, 2007.
- Bishnoi, S., Satyapriya, Sangeeta, V., Lenin, V., Paul, S. and Singh, P., Indian J. Ext. Educ., 2018, 54, 164–170.
- Cafiero, C., Viviani, S. and Nord, M., Measurement, 2018, 116, 146–152.
- Srivastava, S. K., Balaji, S. J. and Kolady, D., Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2016, 29, 119–128.
- FAO, 2000; http://www.fao.org/elearning/course/fa/en/pdf/p-01_rg_concept.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2016).
- Yu, W., Elleby, C. and Zobbe, H., Food Security, 2015, 7, 405–414.
- Pangaribowo, E. H., Gerber, N. and Torero, M., 2013; https://www.wecr.wur.nl/WECRGeneral/FoodSecurePublications/ 05_Pangaribowo%20Gerber%20Torero_FNS%20Indicators.pdf (accessed on 24 May 2016).
- Asha, K. K., Mathew, S., Prasad, M. M., and Ravishankar, C. N., Curr. Sci., 2020, 119, 613–617.
- Bhattacharyya, S., Roy Burman, R. and Paul, S., Curr. Sci., 2019, 116, 26–28.
- Cultivated Land Utilization Index Vis-a-Vis Cropping Intensity for Crop Diversification and Water Resource Management in Odisha, India
Abstract Views :166 |
PDF Views:83
Authors
P. S. Brahmanand
1,
Biswaranjan Behera
1,
Shivendra Kumar Srivastava
2,
R. B. Singandhupe
3,
A. Mishra
1
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Water Management, Bhubaneswar 751 023, IN
2 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur 440 010, IN
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Water Management, Bhubaneswar 751 023, IN
2 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur 440 010, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 120, No 7 (2021), Pagination: 1217-1224Abstract
The cultivated land utilization index (CLUI) for all the districts of Odisha, India during 2013–14 was estimated in this study. The average state CLUI value (0.585) indicated the scope of improving resource utilization, though 67% of the net cropped area is sown twice. All the districts of the state were classified under four scenarios with various combinations of cropping intensity and CLUI. Growing long-duration crop varieties under conditions of ample water availability and, more short-duration less water-requiring crops under limited water supply will improve resource utilization. The results pave the way for analysis of CLUI at a national level for efficient resource utilization by formulating cropping patterns based on water availability.Keywords
Cultivated Land Utilization Index, Cropping Intensity, Crop Diversification, Water Resource Management, Water Availability.Full Text
References
- Business Standard, Foodgrain production estimated at 284.95 million tonnes for 2018–19: 4th advance estimates. 19 August 2019; https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-cm/foodgrainproductionestimated-at-284-95-million-tonnes-for-2018-19-4thadvance-estimates-119081901206_1.html
- ICAR-IIWM, Vision 2050-ICAR-IIWM. ICAR-Indian Institute of Water Management, Bhubaneshwar, 2015, p. 21; http://www.iiwm.res.in/pdf/Vision_2050.pdf
- Brahmanand, P. S. and Ambast, S. K., Study and analysis of negative list of Indian districts for cultivation of water guzzling crops. Status report (internal circulation). ICAR-Indian Institute of Water Management, Bhubaneshwar, 2016, p. 19.
- Coulibaly, O. and Ouedraogo, A., Correlation of global solar radiation of eight synoptic stations in Burkina Faso based on linear and multiple linear regression methods. J. Solar Energy, 2016, Article ID 7870907; https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7870907.
- Qian, C., Impact of land use/land cover change on changes in surface solar radiation in eastern China since the reform and opening up. Theoret. Appl. Climatol., 2014, 123, 131–139.
- Haque, S., Impact of irrigation on cropping intensity and potentiality of groundwater in Murshidabad district of West Bengal, India. Int. J. Ecosyst., 2015, 5(3A), 55–64.
- Sujatha, B., Photosynthesis. In Plant Biology and Biotechnology (eds Bahadur, B. et al.), 2015, pp. 569–591; ISBN: 978-81-3222285-9.
- Keisecker, J., Baruch-Mordo, S., Heiner, M., Negandhi, D., Oakleaf, J., Kennedy, C. and Chauhan, P., Renewable energy and land use in India: a vision to facilitate sustainable development. MDPI Sustain., 2019, 12(281), 1–14.
- Chuang, F. T., An analysis of change of Taiwan’s cultivated land utilisation for recent years. Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction Report 21 Rural and Land Economics Division, Taipei, Taiwan, 1973.
- Ray, S. S., Sood, A., Panigrahy, S. and Parihar, J. S., Derivation of indices using remote sensing data to evaluate cropping systems. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2005, 33, 475.
- Goswami, J., Sarma, K. K., Handique, B. K., Das, R., Rahman, N. and Raju, P. L. N., Study of cropping system in Morigaon district of Assam using geospatial technique. Int. J. Adv. Remote Sensing, GIS Geogr., 2017, 5(1), 53–59.
- Government of Odisha, Odisha Agricultural Statistics 2013–14, Directorate of Agriculture and Food Production, 2015, p. 156.
- Ambast, S. K., Panda, R. K., Sethi, R. R. and Brahmanand, P. S., State irrigation plan of Odisha (Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana). Final report submitted to Government of Odisha, 2019, p. 138.
- Guidelines for improving water use efficiency in irrigation, domestic and industrial sectors. Performance overview and management improvement organization, Central Water Commission, New Delhi, 2014, p. 24.
- Singandhupe, R. B. and Sethi, R. R., Groundwater resources, its mining and crop planning in Orissa, India. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., 2016, 6(11), 26–32.
- Ali, M. H. and Mubarak, S., Effective rainfall calculation methods for field crops: an overview, analysis, and new formulation. Asian Res. J. Agric., 2017, 7(1), 1–12.
- Guhathakurta, P., Kulkarni, D., Khedikar, S., Menon, P., Prasad, A. K., Sable, S. T. and Advani, S. C., Observed rainfall variability and changes over Odisha state. Meteorology Monograph No.: ESSO/IMD/HS/Rainfall Variability, India Meteorology Department, Pune, 2020, vol. 20, p. 44.
- Srivastava, R. C., Singandhupe, R. B. and Mohanty, R. K., Integrated farming approach for runoff recycling systems in humid plateau areas of eastern India. Agric. Water Manage., 2004, 64, 197–212.
- Sahu, R. K., Katre, P. and Tripathi, M. P., Alleviation of drought through water harvesting in Chhattisgarh. In Watershed Management (eds Singh, V. P. and Yadav, R. N.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Water and Environment, Bhopal, 15– 18 December 2003.
- Rathore, A. L., Pal, A. R., Sahu, R. K. and Chaudhary, J. L., On farm rainwater and crop management for improving productivity of rainfed areas. Agric. Water Manage., 1996, 31, 253–267.
- Rathore, A. L. and Pal, A. R., Influence of soil drainage on productivity of soybean and peanut grown in a vertisol. Paper presented at the symposium on a sustainable Crop Production in Madhya Pradesh, Raipur Chapter of the Indian Society of Agronomy, at College of Agriculture, Raipur, 23 December 1994.
- Pal, A. R., Rathore, A. L. and Pandey, V. K., Rainwater storage system for improving riceland productivity, opportunities and challenges for eastern India. Paper presented at the International Conference on Water and Environment held in Bhopal, 15–18 December 2003.
- Singandhupe, R. B., Sensitivity analysis of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) models for irrigation requirement of crops and impact of irrigation on climate changes in semi-arid of India. Adv. Res., 2017, 11(6), 1–16.
- Shukla, J. and Mintz, Y., Influence of land-surface evapotranspiration on the earth’s climate. Science, 1982, 215, 1498–1501.
- Segal, M., Pan, Z. and Turner, R. E., On the potential impact of irrigated areas in North America on summer rainfall caused by large-scale systems. J. Appl. Meteorol., 1998, 37, 325–331.
- Roy, S. B. and Avissar, R., Impact of land use/land cover change on regional hydrometeorology in Amazonia. J. Geophys. Res., 2002, 107, 4.1–4.12.
- Singandhupe, R. B., Rao, G. G. S. N., Patil, N. G. and Brahmanand, P. S., Fertigation studies and irrigation system in tomato (Lycopercon eskulentus L.). Eur. J. Agron., 2003, 19, 327–340.
- Antony, E. and Singandhupe, R. B., Impact of drip and surface irrigation on growth, yield and WUE of capsicum (Capsicum annum L.). Agric. Water Manage., 2004, 65, 121–132.
- Behera, M. S., Mahapatra, P. K., Singandhupe, R. B. and Kannan, K., Fertigation studies in Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis L.) under humid climate in Odisha, India. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 2015, 10(11), 1020–1030.
- Singandhupe, R. B., Bankar, M. C., Anand, P. S. B. and Patil, N. G., Drip irrigated sugarcane in western India. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 2008, 54(6), 629–649.
- Payment for ecosystem services and its applications in India
Abstract Views :160 |
PDF Views:72
Authors
Suvangi Rath
1,
Amarendra Das
2,
Shivendra Kumar Srivastava
3,
T. M. Kiran Kumara
3,
Khitish Kumar Sarangi
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751 003, India., IN
2 School of Humanities and Social Science, National Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhubaneswar 752 050, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai 400 094, India., IN
3 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, India., IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751 003, India., IN
2 School of Humanities and Social Science, National Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhubaneswar 752 050, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai 400 094, India., IN
3 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi 110 012, India., IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 124, No 7 (2023), Pagination: 799-806Abstract
Ecosystem services are the processes of nature that directly or indirectly benefit human beings. These services need to be conserved through incentive-based market approaches for a sustainable future. Payment for ecosystem services (PES) is one approach that aims to manage natural resources and ecosystem stewardship, wherein the users recompense the conservators of the ecosystem services. While PES has numerous benefits in enhancing the awareness of linkages between human well-being (e.g. poverty alleviation) and ecosystem services, it is constrained by major challenges, especially in developing countries like India. This article reviews the significant issues and challenges of environmental marketing in India and suggests measures to promote PES.Keywords
Environment, Livelihood Security, Market, Payment for Ecosystem Services, Sustainable Future.Full Text
References
- Dasgupta, P., The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review. HM Treasury, Government of the United Kingdom, 2021.
- Bateman, I., Mace, G. M., Fezzi, C., Atkinson, G. and Turner, K., Economic analysis of ecosystem service assessments. Environ. Resour. Econ., 2010, 48, 177–218.
- Barbier, E. B., Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. Econ. Policy, 2007, 22, 177–229.
- Fisher, B. and Turner, R. K., Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biol. Conserv., 2008, 141, 1167–1169.
- Maler, K.-G., Aniyar, S. and Jansson, A., Accounting for ecosystem services. Environ. Resour. Econ., 2008, 42, 39–51.
- Ajayi, O. C., Jack, B. K. and Leimona, B., Auction design for the private provision of public goods in developing countries: lessons from payments for environmental services in Malawi and Indonesia. World Dev., 2011, 40, 1213–1223.
- Daily, G. C. (ed.), Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
- Costanza, R. et al., The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387, 253–260; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/387253a0.
- Wilson, C. M. and Matthews, W. H. (eds), Man’s Impact on the Global Environment: Report of the Study of Critical Environmental Problems (SCEP), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1970.
- Westman, W. E., How much are nature’s services worth? Science, 1977, 197(4307), 960–964.
- Ehrlich, P. and Ehrlich, A., Extinction, Ballantine Books, New York, USA, 1981.
- Ehrlich, P. R. and Mooney, H. A., Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. BioScience, 1983, 33(4), 248–254; https://doi. org/10.2307/1309037
- Fisher, B., Turner, R. K. and Morling, P., Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ., 2008, 68(3), 643–653.
- Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R. S., Lomas, P. L. and Montes, C., The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ., 2010, 69(6), 1209–1218.
- Norgaard, R. B., Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol. Econ., 2010, 69(6), 1219–1227.
- Sukhdev, P., The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: an interim report, European Community, Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
- IPBES secretariat; https://ipbes.net (accessed on 23 August 2022).
- Mooney, H. A. and Ehrlich, P. R., Nature’s Services, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1997, pp. 11–19.
- MA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
- Goldman, R., Thompson, B. and Daily, G., Institutional incentives for managing the landscape: inducing cooperation for the production of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ., 2007, 64, 333–343.
- Shapiro, J. and Báldi, A., Accurate accounting: how to balance ecosystem services and disservices. Ecosys. Serv., 2014, 7, 201– 202.
- Sandbrook, C. G. and Burgess, N. D., Biodiversity and ecosystem services: not all positive. Ecosyst. Serv., 2015, 12, 29.
- Thompson, S. C. G. and Barton, M. A., Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J. Environ. Psychol., 1994, 14(2), 149–157.
- McCauley, D. J., Selling out on nature. Nature, 2006, 443, 27–28.
- Dhruba Bijaya, G. C. et al., Payment for ecosystem services in Nepal: a literature review on overview and recommendations for further research. Acta Sci. Agric., 2018, 2(11), 37–42.
- Engel, S., Pagiola, S. and Wunder, S., Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ., 2008, 65, 663–674.
- Daily, G. et al., Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ., 2009, 7(1), 21–28.
- Gaworecki, M., Cash for conservation: do payments for ecosystem services work? 2017; https://news.mongabay.com/2017/10/cash-for-conservation-do-payments-for-ecosystem-services-work/ (accessed on 14 July 2022).
- Turner, R. and Daily, G., The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environ. Resour. Econ., 2008, 39(1), 25–35.
- Carroll, N. and Jenkins, M., The matrix: mapping ecosystem service markets. In Ecosystem Marketplace. Integrated Solutions: Water Biodiversity and the clean development mechanism. EM Market Insights: Beyond Carbon. The Katoomba Group, Forest Trends and Ecosystem Marketplace, 2010, pp. 1–40.
- Landell-Mills, N. and Porras, I., Silver bullet or fool’s gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor, IIED, London, UK, 2002.
- Madsen, B., Carroll, N. and Moore Brands, K., State of biodiversity markets. Ecosystem Marketplace, USA, 2010; http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com (accessed on 20 July 2022).
- Hamilton, K., Sjardin, M., Peters-Stanley, M. and Marcello, T., Building bridges: state of the voluntary carbon markets 2010. Ecosystem Marketplace and Bloomberg New Energy Finance, Washington, DC, USA, 2010; http://www.foresttrends.org/publication_ details.php?publicationID=2433 (accessed on 20 July 2022).
- Stanton, T., Echavarria, M., Hamilton, K. and Ott, C., State of watershed payments: an emerging marketplace. Ecosystem Marketplace, USA, 2010; http://www.foresttrends.org/documents/files/ doc_2438.pdf (accessed on 14 June 2022).
- Zhang, L., Tu, Q. and Mol, A., Payment for environmental services: the sloping land conversion program in Ningxia Autonomous Region of China. China World Econ., 2008, 16(2), 66–81.
- Pagiola, S., Ramierz, E., Gobbi, J., de Haan, C., Ibrahim, M., Murgueitio, E. and Pablo Ruiz, J., Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua. Ecol. Econ., 2007, 64, 374–385.
- Rosa, H., Kandel, S. and Dimas, L. Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: lessons from the Americas. Int. For. Rev., 2004, 6(2), 187–194.
- Pagiola, S. et al., Paying for biodiversity conservation services in agricultural landscapes. Environmental Economics Series, Environment Department Paper No. 96. The World Bank Environment, 2004.
- Ferraro, P. and Kiss, A., Direct payments for biodiversity conservation. Science, 2002, 298, 1718–1719.
- Ferraro, P. and Simpson, R., The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments. Land Econ., 2002, 78, 339–353.
- Pattanayak, W. and Ferraro, P. J., Show me the money: do payments supply environmental services in developing countries? Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 2010, 4(2), 254–274.
- Kroeger, T. and Casey, F., An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecol. Econ., 2007, 64, 321–332.
- Naidoo, R., Malcolm, T. and Tomasek, A., Economic benefits of standing forests in highland areas of Borneo: quantification and policy impacts. Conserv. Lett., 2009, 2(1), 36–45.
- Kosoy, N., Martinez-Tuna, M., Muradian, R. and Martinez-Alier, J., Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecol. Econ., 2007, 61, 446–455.
- Ferraro, P. J. and Pattanayak, S. K., Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biol., 2006, 4(4), e105; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.0040105.
- Robertson, N. and Wunder, S., Fresh tracks in the forest. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, 2005.
- Swinton, S., Lupi, F., Robertson, G. and Hamilton, S., Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol. Econ., 2007, 64, 245–252.
- Wunder, S., Between purity and reality: taking stock of PES schemes in the Andes. In Ecosystem Marketplace. Integrated Solutions: Water biodiversity and the clean development mechanism. EM Market Insights: Beyond Carbon. The Katoomba Group, Forest Trends and Ecosystem Marketplace, 2009, pp. 1–40.
- Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A. and Platais, G., Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Dev., 2005, 33(2), 237–253.
- Wunder, S., Engel, S. and Pagiola, A., Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecol. Econ., 2008, 65, 834–852.
- Zilberman, D., Lipper, L. and McCarthy, N., When could payments for environmental services benefit the poor? Environ. Dev. Econ., 2008, 13(3), 255–278; doi:10.1017/S1355770X08004294.
- Jack, B., Kousky, C. and Sims, K., Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2008, 105(28), 9465–9470.
- Carroll, N. and Jenkins, M. (eds), The Matrix: Mapping Ecosystem Service Markets, Forest Trends and Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
- Panayotou, T., Green Markets: The Economics of Sustainable Development, ICS Press Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1993.
- Lerche, J., Agrarian crisis and agrarian questions in India. J. Agrar. Change, 2011, 11(1), 104–118.
- Gandhi, G., The Indian farmer is protesting about much more than loan waivers. The Wire, 2017; https://thewirein/146200/farmersprotest-drought-loan-agriculture-maharashtra-mp/ (accessed on 22 June 2022).
- Kumar, L., Manjula, M., Ramachandra, B., Venkatachalam, L., Suresh Kumar, D., Indira Devi, P. and Mukhopadhyay, P., Doubling India’s farm incomes paying farmers for ecosystem services, not just crops. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2019, 54(23), 43–49.
- Van der Ploeg, S., De Groot, R. S. and Wang, Y., The TEEB Valuation Database: overview of structure, data and results. Foundation for Sustainable Development, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2010.
- Indira Devi, P. et al., Payment for ecosystem services: guaranteed farm income and sustainable agriculture. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2017, LII(17), 12–14.
- Adhikari, B., Market based approaches to environmental management: a review of lessons from payment for ecosystem services in Asia. ADBI Working Paper Series, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 2009, p. 134.