Refine your search
Collections
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Dasgupt, Niladri
- Eco-Geomorphic Assessment of the Varanasi Turtle Sanctuary and its Implication for Ganga River Conservation
Abstract Views :181 |
PDF Views:75
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal - 462 066, IN
2 Ganga Aqualife Conservation Monitoring Centre, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun - 248 001, IN
3 Department of Landscape Level Planning and Management, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun - 248 001, IN
4 Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur - 208 016, IN
1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal - 462 066, IN
2 Ganga Aqualife Conservation Monitoring Centre, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun - 248 001, IN
3 Department of Landscape Level Planning and Management, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun - 248 001, IN
4 Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur - 208 016, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 116, No 12 (2019), Pagination: 2063-2071Abstract
The eco-geomorphology of the Varanasi Turtle Sanctuary (VTS) located on the Ganga River in Uttar Pradesh, India was examined for its stability using hydraulic geometry of the channels, such as width, depth and discharge acquired from an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler, and the mapping of planform morphology from remote-sensing images. Planform maps were generated using Corona and Landsat satellite images for the period 1965–2018. The assessment suggests a well-defined, stable cross-section profile along this stretch of the river. It provides conclusive evidence that the geomorphology of the Ganga River within the VTS has remained stable for the past 50 years, except for some minor changes in the form of bar growth and erosion both upstream and downstream of the sanctuary. Construction activities along the bank, movement of large vessels, sand mining in the sanctuary or dredging of the main channel may destabilize the river geomorphology that will negatively affect the integrity of the VTS as well as the ghats at Varanasi.Keywords
Hydraulic Geometry, Planform Morphology, River Conservation, Turtle Sanctuary.Full Text
References
- Kumar, S., Jha, P. and Baier, K., Pollution of Ganga River due to urbanization of Varanasi: Adverse conditions faced by the slum population. Environ. Urban ASIA, 2012, 3, 343-352.
- MoEF, Annual Report 1989-90, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India (GoI), 1990.
- WII, Assessment of the wildlife values of the Ganga River from Bijnor to Ballia including turtle wildlife sanctuary, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2018.
- Behera, S., Areendran, G., Gautam, P. and Sagar, V., For a Living Ganga, 2011.
- MoEF, India’s Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Ministry of Environment and Forests, GoI, 2014.
- Gregory, K. J., The human role in changing river channels. Geomorphology, 2006, 79, 172-191.
- Kondolf, G. M., Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environ. Manage., 1997, 21, 533-551.
- Thorp, J. H., Thoms, M. C. and Delong, M. D., The rivrine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river network across space and time. River Res. Appl., 2006, 22(2), 123-147.
- Junk, W. J., Bayley, P. B. and Sparks, R. E., The flood pulse concept in river - floodplain systems. In Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Canada, 1989, vol. 106, pp. 110-127.
- Ministry of Shipping, Cabinet approves Jal Marg Vikas Project for enhanced navigation on the Haldia-Varanasi stretch of National Waterway-1, Press Information Bureau, GoI, 2018.
- Newson, M. D. and Newson, C. L., Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 2000, 24, 195-217.
- Corenblit, D., Tabacchi, E., Steiger, J. and Gurnell, A. M., Reciprocal interactions and adjustments between fluvial landforms and vegetation dynamics in river corridors: a review of complementary approaches. Earth-Sci. Rev., 2007, 84, 56-86.
- Statzner, B., Gore, J. A. and Resh, V. H., Hydraulic stream ecology : observed patterns and potential applications. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 1988, 7(4), 307-360.
- Jaeger, C. P. and Cobb, V. A., Comparative spatial ecologies of female painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) and red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta) at Reelfoot Lake, Tennessee. Chelonian Conserv. Biol., 2012, 11, 59-67.
- Lindeman, P. V., Resource use of five sympatric turtle species: effects of competition, phylogeny, and morphology. Can. J. Zool., 2000, 78, 992-1008.
- Chauvet, H. et al., Recirculation cells in a wide channel. Phys. Fluids, 2014, 26(1), 016604-10.
- Gaurav, K. et al., Morphology of the Kosi megafan channels. Earth Surf. Dyn., 2015, 3(3), 321-331.
- Gaurav, K., Tandon, S. K., Devauchelle, O., Sinha, R. and Métivier, F., A single width-discharge regime relationship for individual threads of braided and meandering rivers from the Himalayan Foreland. Geomorphology, 2017, 295, 126-133.
- Fredsøe, J., Meandering and braiding of rivers. J. Fluid Mech., 1978, 84, 609-624.
- Rosgen, D. L., A classification of natural rivers. Catena, 1994, 22, 169-199.
- CUTS International, Expanding tradable benefits of inland waterways: case of India, 2017; www.cuts-international.org
- Garrad, P. N. and Hey, R. D., Boat traffic, sediment resuspension and turbidity in a Broadland river. J. Hydrol., 1987, 95, 289-297.
- Houser, C., Sediment resuspension by vessel-generated waves along the Savannah River, Georgia. J. Waterway. Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 2011, 137, 246-257.
- Smart, M. M., Rada, R. G., Nielsen, D. N. and Claflin, T., The effect of commercial and recreational traffic on the resuspension of sediment in Navigation Pool 9 of the Upper Mississippi River. Hydrobiologia, 1985, 126, 263-274.