Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Public perception of flood risks and warnings in the flood-prone Kashmir Valley, India


Affiliations
1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, India
2 Division of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, India
3 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad 211 007, India
 

Floods are the most recurrent of all natural disasters in Kashmir Valley, Jammu and Kashmir, India, affecting both society and economy. Despite various efforts to prevent loss of lives and assets during floods, a crucial component of flood management, i.e. how the inhabitants perceive flood risk, is not well-known in the region. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted in flood-prone regions of the Valley to gain information on how public understands the risk of flooding in their area, their flood preparedness, knowledge about floods and the trust in various institutions for managing floods and disseminating flood warnings. Respondent demographics was then linked with their answers to establish potential correlations. Responses illustrate that the respondents consider floods as the most important natural disaster in the Valley and most of them mention that the risk is increasing. Results show that the respondents have average knowledge regarding floods, flood protection measures and emergency actions in case of floods. At the individual level, they had not taken adequate steps for safeguarding themselves or their families against floods. The characteristics of respondents namely age, gender, income, education level and previous experience with floods showed statistically significant correlations with the responses. In general, the findings of the study call for better education of the inhabitants regarding flood risks and management actions as well as improvement of existing methods of flood forecasting and warning in the region.

Keywords

Flood forecasting and warning, public perception, question-based survey, risk estimation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Perera, D., Agnihotri, J., Seidou, O. and Djalante, R., Identifying societal challenges in flood early warning systems. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 2020, 51, 101794.

  • Azam, M., Kim, H. S. and Maeng, S. J., Development of flood alert application in Mushim stream watershed Korea. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 2017, 21, 11–26.

  • Perry, R. W. and Lindell, M. K., Preparedness for emergency response: guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters, 2003, 27, 336–350.

  • NASEM, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. In Emergency Alert and Warning Systems: Current Knowledge and Future Research Directions, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2018, pp. 1–128.

  • Kelsch, M., Caporali, E. and Lanza, L. G., Hydrometeorology of flash floods. In Coping With Flash Floods, Springer, The Netherlands, 2001, pp. 19–35.

  • Ayeb‐Karlsson, S. et al., I will not go, I cannot go: cultural and social limitations of disaster preparedness in Asia, Africa, and Oceania. Disasters, 2019, 43, 752–770.

  • Kim, D. K. D. and Madison, T. P., Public risk perception attitude and information-seeking efficacy on floods: a formative study for disaster preparation campaigns and policies. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., 2020, 11, 592–601.

  • Jain, S. et al., A brief review of flood forecasting techniques and their applications. Int. J. River Basin Manage., 2018, 16, 329–344.

  • Terpstra, T. and Lindell, M. K., Citizens’ perceptions of flood hazard adjustments: an application of the protective action decision model. Environ. Behav., 2013, 45, 993–1018.

  • Hung, H. C., The attitude towards flood insurance purchase when respondents’ preferences are uncertain: a fuzzy approach. J. Risk Res., 2009, 12, 239–258.

  • Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C. and Kuhlicke, C., The risk perception paradox-implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal., 2013, 33, 1049–1065.

  • Kellens, W., Terpstra, T. and De Maeyer, P., Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research. Risk Anal., 2013, 33, 24–49.

  • Becker, G., Aerts, J. C. J. H. and Huitema, D., Influence of flood risk perception and other factors on risk-reducing behaviour: a survey of municipalities along the Rhine. J. Flood Risk Manage., 2014, 7, 16–30.

  • Ge, Y., Yang, G., Wang, X., Dou, W., Lu, X. and Mao, J., Understanding risk perception from floods: a case study from China. Nat. Hazards, 2021, 105, 3119–3140.

  • Poussin, J. K., Botzen, W. J. W. and Aerts, J. C. J. H., Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2014, 40, 69–77.

  • Barberi, F., Davis, M. S., Isaia, R., Nave, R. and Ricci, T., Volcanic risk perception in the Vesuvius population. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 2008, 172, 244–258.

  • Ganjoo, R. K., The Vale of Kashmir: landform evolution and processes. In World Geomorphological Landscapes, Springer, 2014, pp. 125–133.

  • Ali, S., Samie, A. U., Ali, A., Bhat, A. H., Mir, T. and Prasad, B. V., Mental health: a global issue affecting the pattern of life in Kashmir. In Research Anthology on Mental Health Stigma, Education and Treatment, IGI Global, 2021, pp. 143–152.

  • Shah, A. A., Khwaja, S., Shah, B. A., Reduan, Q. and Jawi, Z., Living with earthquake and flood hazards in Jammu and Kashmir, NW Himalaya. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 6, 179.

  • Bhat, M. S., Ahmad, B., Alam, A., Farooq, H. and Ahmad, S., Flood hazard assessment of the Kashmir Valley using historical hydrology. J. Flood Risk Manage., 2019, 12, e12521.

  • Govt of J&K and NRSC, A satellite based rapid assessment on flood in Jammu and Kashmir – September 2014. Department of Ecology, Environment and Remote Sensing, Government of Jammu and Kashmir, NRSC, Department of Space, 2015.

  • Parsa, P. S. A. and Zehra, K., Administrative response to 2014 floods in Jammu and Kashmir: a critical analysis of pre and postflood management measures. J. Crit. Rev., 2020, 7, 3557–3567.

  • Wang, Z., Wang, H., Huang, J., Kang, J. and Han, D., Analysis of the public flood risk perception in a flood-prone city: the case of Jingdezhen city in China. Water (Switzerland), 2018, 10, 1577.

  • Zhang, Z., Univariate description and bivariate statistical inference: the first step delving into data. Ann. Transl. Med., 2016, 4.

  • Harnois, C. E. and Hewamanne, S., Categorical variables without categorical thinking? a relational reading of the Sri Lankan demographic and health survey. Gender Iss., 2020, 37, 355–375.

  • McHugh, M. L., The chi-square test of independence. Biochem. Med., 2012, 23, 143–149.

  • Greenland, S. et al., Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur. J. Epidemiol., 2016, 31, 337–350.

  • Keoduangsine, S. and Goodwin, R., An appropriate flood warning system in the context of developing countries. Int. J. Innov. Manage. Technol., 2012, 3, 213–216.

  • Venugopal, R. and Yasir, S., The politics of natural disasters in protracted conflict: the 2014 flood in Kashmir. Oxf. Dev. Stud., 2017, 45, 424–442.

  • Hassan, R., Disasters in Kashmir: impact and response. IOSR J. Hum. Soc. Sci., 2014, 19, 32–42.

  • Romshoo, S. A., Altaf, S., Rashid, I. and Ahmad Dar, R., Climatic, geomorphic and anthropogenic drivers of the 2014 extreme flooding in the Jhelum basin of Kashmir, India. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk, 2018, 9, 224–248.

  • Malik, I. H. and Hashmi, S. N. I., Ethnographic account of flooding in North-Western Himalayas: a study of Kashmir Valley. GeoJournal, 2020, 1–19.

  • Heitz, C., Spaeter, S., Auzet, A. V. and Glatron, S., Local stakeholders’ perception of muddy flood risk and implications for management approaches: a case study in Alsace (France). Land Use Policy, 2009, 26, 443–451.

  • Lindell, M. K. and Whitney, D. J., Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk Anal., 2000, 20, 13–26.

  • Miceli, R., Sotgiu, I. and Settanni, M., Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: a study in an alpine valley in Italy. J. Environ. Psychol., 2008, 28, 164–173.

  • Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Mertz, C. K., Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Anal., 1994, 14, 1101–1108.

  • Enarson, E., Fothergill, A. and Peek, L., Gender and Disaster: Foundations and Directions, Springer, New York, USA, 2007, pp. 130–146.

  • Rakib, M. A., Islam, S., Nikolaos, I., Bodrud-Doza, M. and Bhuiyan, M. A. H., Flood vulnerability, local perception and gender role judgment using multivariate analysis: a problem-based ‘participatory action to future skill management’ to cope with flood impacts. Weather Climate Extrem., 2017, 18, 29–43.

  • Bradford, R. A. et al., Risk perception – issues for flood management in Europe. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 2012, 12, 2299–2309.

  • Kellens, W., Zaalberg, R., Neutens, T., Vanneuville, W. and De Maeyer, P., An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian Coast. Risk Anal., 2011, 31, 1055–1068.

  • Whitmarsh, L., Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J. Risk Res., 2008, 11, 351–374.

  • Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W. and Aerts, J. C. J. H., A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Anal., 2012, 32, 1481–1495.


Abstract Views: 207

PDF Views: 83




  • Public perception of flood risks and warnings in the flood-prone Kashmir Valley, India

Abstract Views: 207  |  PDF Views: 83

Authors

Sabah Parvaze
Division of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, India
Junaid Nazir Khan
Division of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, India
Rohitashw Kumar
Division of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, India
Saqib Parvaze Allaie
Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad 211 007, India

Abstract


Floods are the most recurrent of all natural disasters in Kashmir Valley, Jammu and Kashmir, India, affecting both society and economy. Despite various efforts to prevent loss of lives and assets during floods, a crucial component of flood management, i.e. how the inhabitants perceive flood risk, is not well-known in the region. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted in flood-prone regions of the Valley to gain information on how public understands the risk of flooding in their area, their flood preparedness, knowledge about floods and the trust in various institutions for managing floods and disseminating flood warnings. Respondent demographics was then linked with their answers to establish potential correlations. Responses illustrate that the respondents consider floods as the most important natural disaster in the Valley and most of them mention that the risk is increasing. Results show that the respondents have average knowledge regarding floods, flood protection measures and emergency actions in case of floods. At the individual level, they had not taken adequate steps for safeguarding themselves or their families against floods. The characteristics of respondents namely age, gender, income, education level and previous experience with floods showed statistically significant correlations with the responses. In general, the findings of the study call for better education of the inhabitants regarding flood risks and management actions as well as improvement of existing methods of flood forecasting and warning in the region.

Keywords


Flood forecasting and warning, public perception, question-based survey, risk estimation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv122%2Fi5%2F591-599