Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems in the Indian Arid Zone


Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
 

Carbon sequestration potential of eight recommended land-use systems of arid western Rajasthan was compared. Biomass C stock was maximum in farm forestry of Acacia tortilis (31.4 Mg C ha–1) followed by Prosopis cineraria and Hardwickia binata based silvoarable systems (8.8 and 10.6 Mg C ha–1). Soil C stock was also maximum in farm forestry (47.6 Mg C ha–1) followed by Ziziphus based systems (32.5–33.9 Mg C ha–1). About 50–78% of additional soil C stock was in the form of soil inorganic carbon. The total C sequestered (biomass + soil) over a period of nineteen years was in the order: farm forestry (49.80) > silvoarable systems (11.0–13.3) > hortipasture system (8.3) > agri-horti (5.5), silvopasture (5.4) and sole pasture (5.3) compared to –1.0 Mg C ha–1 in sole cropping.

Keywords

Agroforestry, Arid Zone, Carbon Sequestration, Climate Change Mitigation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Lal, R. and Bruce, J. P., The potential of world cropland soil to sequester carbon and mitigate greenhouse effect. Environ. Sci. Policy, 1999, 2, 177–185.

  • Lal, R., Hassan, H. M. and Dumanski, J. M., Desertification control to sequester C and mitigate the greenhouse effect. In Carbon Sequestration in Soils: Science, Monitoring and Beyond (eds Rosenberg, R. J. et al.), Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 1999, pp. 83–107.

  • Lal, R., Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems. Environ. Manage., 2004, 33(4), 528–544.

  • Lal, R., Carbon sequestration in soils of Central Asia. Land Degrad. Dev., 2004, 15, 563–572.

  • Chavan, S. B, Keerthika, A., Dhyani, S. K., Handa, A. K., Ram Newaj and Rajarajan K., National Agroforestry Policy in India: a low hanging fruit. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(10), 1826–1834.

  • Dhyani, S. K., Asha Ram and Inder Dev, Potential of agroforestry in carbon sequestration in India. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2016, 86(9), 1103–1112.

  • Sathaye, J. A. and Ravindranath, N. H., Climate change mitigation in the energy and the forestry sectors of developing countries. Annu. Rev. Energ. Environ., 1998, 23, 387–437.

  • Lal, R., Potential of desertification control to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Climate Change, 2001, 51, 335– 372.

  • Lal, R., Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems of West Asia and North Africa. Land Degrad. Dev., 2002, 13, 45–59.

  • Singh, S. K., Mahesh Kumar, Sharma, B. K. and Tarafdar, J. C., Depletion of organic carbon, phosphorus and potassium stock under a pearl millet based cropping system in the arid region of India. Arid Land Res. Manage., 2007, 21, 119–131.

  • Tewari, J. C., Ram, M. and Roy, M. M., Livelihood improvements and climate change adaptations through agroforestry in hot arid environments. In Agroforestry Systems in India: Livelihood & Ecosystem Services (eds Dagar et al.), Advances in Agroforest., Springer, India, 2014; doi:10.1007/978-81-322-1662-9_6.

  • Tanwar, S. P. S., Akath Singh, Bhati, T. K., Patidar, M., Mathur, B. K., Praveen Kumar and Yadav, O. P., Rainfed integrated farming system for arid zone of India: resilience unmatched. Indian J. Agron., 2018, 63(4), 403–414.

  • Rathore, V. S., Tanwar, S. P. S., Praveen Kumar and Yadav, O. P., Integrated farming system: key to sustainability in arid and semiarid regions. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2019, 89(2), 181–192.

  • Tanwar, S. P. S., Akath Singh, Praveen Kumar, Mathur, B. K. and Patidar, M., Rainfed integrated farming systems for arid zone agriculture: diversification for resilience. Indian Fmg., 2018, 68(09), 29–32.

  • Yadav, B. S., Yadav, B. L. and Chhipa, B. R., Litter dynamics and soil properties under different tree species in a semi-arid region of Rajasthan, India. Agrofor. Syst., 2008, 73, 1–12.

  • Awasthi, O. P. and Singh, I. S., Effect of ber and pomegranate plantation on soil nutrient status of typic torripsamments. Indian J. Hortic., 2010, 67, 138–142.

  • Singh, I. S., Awasthi, O. P., Singh, R. S., More, T. A. and Meena, S. R., Changes in soil properties under tree species. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2012, 82(2), 146–151.

  • Mangalassery, S., Devi Dayal, Meena, S. L. and Bhagirath Ram, Carbon sequestration in agroforestry and pasture systems in arid northwestern India. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(8), 1290–1293.

  • Gupta, D. K., Bhatt, R. K., Keerthika, A., Noor Mohammed, M. B., Shukla, A. K. and Jangid, B. L., Carbon sequestration potential of Hardwickia binata Roxb. Based agroforestry in hot semi-arid environment of India: an assessment of tree density impact. Curr. Sci., 2019, 116(1), 112–116.

  • Sahrawat, K. L., Importance of inorganic carbon in sequestering carbon in soils of dry region. Curr. Sci., 2003, 84, 864–865.

  • Mielnick, P., Dugas, W.A., Mitchell, K. and Havstad, K., Long-term measurements of CO2 flux and evapotranspiration in a Chihuahuan desert grassland. J. Arid Environ., 2005, 60, 423– 436.

  • Mi, N., Wang, S. Q., Liu, J. Y., Yu, G. R., Zhang, W. J. and Jobbágy, E., Soil inorganic carbon storage pattern in China. Global. Change Biol., 2008, 14, 2380–2387.

  • Jain, R. C., Tripathi, S. P., Kumar, V. S. K. and Kumar, S., Volume tables for Acacia tortilis plantations based on data collected from KJD Abadi plantation of Khajuwala range, IGNP area, Rajasthan. Indian For., 1996, 122, 316–322.

  • Chave, J. et al., Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance. Oecologia, 2005, 145, 87–99.

  • Illic, J., Boland, D., McDonald, M., Downes, G. and Blackmore, P., Wood density. Phase 1 – state of knowledge. National carbon accounting system technical report no. 18, Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia, 2000.

  • Andrade, H. J., Brook, R. and Ibrahim, M., Growth, production and carbon sequestration of silvopastoral systems with native timber species in the dry lowlands of Costa Rica. Plant Soil, 2008, 308, 11–22.

  • Walkley, A. and Black, I. A., An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 1934, 37, 29–37.

  • Muthana, K. D. and Arora, G. D., Acacia tortilis (Forsk) – a promising fast growing tree for Indian arid zone. Central Arid Zone Research Institute Tech. Bull. No. 5, 1979, 1–20.

  • Patel, K. N., Shakhela, R. R. and Jat, J. R., Growth, biomass production and CO2 sequestration of some important multipurpose trees under rainfed condition. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 2017, 6(10), 1943–1950.

  • Jobbagy, E. G. and Jackson, R. B., The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon in relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Appl., 2000, 10, 423–436.

  • Soni, M. L., Yadava, N. D. and Bhardwaj, S., Dynamics of leaf litter decomposition of four tree species of arid western Rajasthan under varying soil moisture regimes. Int. J. Trop. Agric., 2016, 34(4), 955–960.

  • Bear, M. H., Cabrera, M. L., Hendrix, P. F. and Coleman, D. C., Aggregate-protected and unprotected organic matter pools in conventional and no-tillage soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1994, 58, 787– 795.

  • Roscoe, R. and Burman, P., Tillage effects on soil organic matter in the density fractions of a Cerrado Oxisol. Soil Tillage Res., 2003, 70, 107–119.

  • Kladivko, E. J., Tillage systems and soil ecology. Soil Tillage Res., 2001, 61, 61–76.

  • Soni, M. L., Beniwal, R. K., Talvar, H., Yadava, N. D., Sing, J. P. and Sunil Kumar, Root distribution pattern of sewan (Lasiurus sindicus) and buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) of arid ecosystem of western Rajasthan in relation to their soil binding capacity. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2006, 76(12), 716–720.

  • Tan, W. F. et al., Soil inorganic carbon stock under different soil types and land uses on the Loess Plateau region of China. Catena, 2014, 121, 22–30.

  • Schlesinger, W. H., Carbon storage in the Caliche of arid soils: a case study from Arizona. Soil Sci., 1982, 133, 247–255.

  • Wang, X. J., Wang, J. P., Minggang, Xu, Zhang, W., Fan, T. and Zhang, J., Carbon accumulation in arid croplands of northwest China: pedogenic carbonate exceeding organic carbon. Sci. Rep., 2015, 5, 11439.

  • Li, Z. P. et al., Assessment of soil organic and carbonate carbon storage in China. Geoderma, 2007, 138, 119–126.

  • Lal, R., Residue management, conservation tillage and soil restoration for mitigating greenhouse effect by CO2-enrichment. Soil Tillage Res., 1997, 43, 81–107.

  • Wang J. P., Wang, X. J., Zhang, J. and Zhao, C. Y., Soil organic and inorganic carbon and stable carbon isotopes in the Yanqi basin of northwestern China. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 2015, 66, 95–103.

  • Nair, P. K. R., Nair, V. D., Kumar, B. M. and Showalter, J. M., Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv. Agron., 2010, 108, 237–307.


Abstract Views: 292

PDF Views: 79




  • Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems in the Indian Arid Zone

Abstract Views: 292  |  PDF Views: 79

Authors

S. P. S. Tanwar
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
Praveen Kumar
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
Archana Verma
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
R. K. Bhatt
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
Akath Singh
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
Kanhaiya Lal
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
M. Patidar
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
B. K. Mathur
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India

Abstract


Carbon sequestration potential of eight recommended land-use systems of arid western Rajasthan was compared. Biomass C stock was maximum in farm forestry of Acacia tortilis (31.4 Mg C ha–1) followed by Prosopis cineraria and Hardwickia binata based silvoarable systems (8.8 and 10.6 Mg C ha–1). Soil C stock was also maximum in farm forestry (47.6 Mg C ha–1) followed by Ziziphus based systems (32.5–33.9 Mg C ha–1). About 50–78% of additional soil C stock was in the form of soil inorganic carbon. The total C sequestered (biomass + soil) over a period of nineteen years was in the order: farm forestry (49.80) > silvoarable systems (11.0–13.3) > hortipasture system (8.3) > agri-horti (5.5), silvopasture (5.4) and sole pasture (5.3) compared to –1.0 Mg C ha–1 in sole cropping.

Keywords


Agroforestry, Arid Zone, Carbon Sequestration, Climate Change Mitigation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi12%2F2014-2022