Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Targeting Transcription Factors for Plant Disease Resistance:Shifting Paradigm


Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Pathology, S.D. Agricultural University, S. K. Nagar 385 506, India
2 Bioscience Research Centre, S.D. Agricultural University, S. K. Nagar 385 506, India
3 National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali 140 306, India
 

Transcription factors (TFs) are regulatory proteins that have the ability to alter targeted gene expression either solely by themselves or as a part of the protein complex. Many such TFs have significant regulatory role in plant defence. Being master switches for gene regulation, they become the unique candidates for targeting functional hub and dynamic networks and nodes of different defence signalling pathways in plant. Of many approaches transgenic overexpression or down-regulation of TFs is widely adopted, mainly to characterize their vital role in disease resistance; however their practical utilization remains limited in breeding programmes. Alternatively, exogenous application of synthetic chemicals/biocontrol agents is also efficient to regulate their expression, but not suc-cessful in the field. Hence, the focus has now shifted towards synthetic promoters (SPs) and synthetic tran-scription factors (STFs) to modulate gene expression. They have greater advantages over the natural ones for their target sequence-specificity, speed, and pre-cise activity. Therefore, manipulation of plant defence regulatory networks by utilizing SPs or STFs repre-sents a new era for synthetically modified crops without negative aspects of the existing biotechnology. This dynamic shift in approach from conventional to modern, transgenic to non-transgenic for manipulat-ing plant defence is discussed in this article, with the aim of their commercial application in crop improve-ment.

Keywords

Transcription Factors, Plant Defence, Peptide Interference, Synthetic Promoters, Gene Expression.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Century, K., Reuber, T. L. and Ratcliffe, O. J., Regulating the regulators: the future prospects for transcription-factor-based agricultural biotechnology products. Plant Physiol., 2008, 147, 20–29.

  • Liu, L., White, M. J. and MacRae, T. H., Transcription factors and their genes in higher plants functional domains, evolution and regulation. Eur. J. Biochem., 1999, 262, 247–257.

  • Yanagisawa, S. and Sheen, J., Involvement of maize Dof zinc finger proteins in tissue-specific and light-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell, 1998, 10, 75–89.

  • Thomas, M. C. and Chiang, C. M., The general transcription machinery and general cofactors. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 2006, 41, 105–178.

  • Thakur, M. and Sohal, B. S., Role of elicitors in inducing resistance in plants against pathogen infection: a review. ISRN Biochem., 2013, 76, 2412.

  • Bektas, Y. and Eulgem, T., Synthetic plant defence elicitors. Front. Plant Sci., 2015, 5, 804.

  • Walters, D. R., Ratsep, J. and Havis, N. D., Controlling crop diseases using induced resistance: challenges for the future. J. Exp. Bot., 2013, 64, 1263–1280.

  • Wiesel, L. et al., Molecular effects of resistance elicitors from biological origin and their potential for crop protection. Front. Plant Sci., 2014, 5, 655.

  • Broun, P. et al., WIN1, a transcriptional activator of epidermal wax accumulation in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, 101, 4706–4711.

  • Shibuya, N. and Minami, E., Oligosaccharide signaling for defence responses in plant. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 2001, 59, 223–233.

  • Brotman, Y. et al., Synthetic ultrashort cationic lipopeptides induce systemic plant defence responses against bacterial and fungal pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2009, 75, 5373–5379.

  • Albert, M., Peptides as triggers of plant defence. J. Exp. Bot., 2013, 64, 5269–5279.

  • Jaskiewicz, M., Conrath, U. and Peterhansel, C., Chromatin modification acts as a memory for systemic acquired resistance in the plant stress response. EMBO Rep., 2011, 12, 50–55.

  • Knoth, C. et al., The synthetic elicitor 3,5-dichloroanthranilic acid induces NPR1-dependent and NPR1-independent mechanisms of disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol., 2009, 150, 333–347.

  • Chandler, D. et al., The development, regulation and use of biopesticides for integrated pest management. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2011, 366, 1987–1998.

  • Pajerowska-Mukhtar, K. M. et al., The HSF-like transcription factor TBF1 is a major molecular switch for plant growth-to-defence transition. Curr. Biol., 2012, 22, 103–112.

  • Eulgem, T. and Somssich, I. E., Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defence signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2007, 10, 366–371.

  • Brotman, Y. et al., Trichoderma – plant ischolar_main colonization: escaping early plant defence responses and activation of the antioxidant machinery for saline stress tolerance. PLOS Pathog., 2013, 9, e1003221.

  • Xu, X. et al., Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell, 2006, 18, 1310–1326.

  • Saenz-Mata, J., Salazar-Badillo, F. B. and Jimenez-Bremont, J. F., Transcriptional regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY genes under interaction with beneficial fungus Trichoderma atroviride. Acta. Physiol. Plant, 2014, 36, 1085–1093.

  • Besseau, S., Li, J. and Palva, E. T., WRKY54 and WRKY70 co-operate as negative regulators of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot., 2012, 63, 2667–2679.

  • Kjellin, J., Role of WRKY20 transcription factor and raffinose in plant defence responses upon Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain 5113-mediated priming in Arabidopsis thaliana. Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Uppsala, Sweden, 2012.

  • Mayo, S. et al., Development of a qPCR strategy to select bean genes involved in plant defence response and regulated by the Trichoderma velutinum – Rhizoctonia solani interaction. Front. Plant Sci., 2016, 7, 1109.

  • Pozo, M. J. et al., Transcription factor MYC2 is involved in priming for enhanced defence during rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol., 2008, 180, 511–523.

  • Van der Ent, S. et al., MYB72 is required in early signaling steps of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol., 2008, 146, 1293–1304.

  • Pieterse, C. M. J. et al., Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nature Chem. Biol., 2009, 5, 308–316.

  • Vannini, C. et al., The ectopic expression of the rice OsMYB4 gene in Arabidopsis increases tolerance to abiotic, environmental and biotic stress. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 2006, 69, 26–42.

  • Rushton, P. J. et al., Synthetic plant promoters containing defined regulatory elements provide novel insights into pathogen- and wound-induced signaling. Plant Cell, 2002, 14, 749–762.

  • Kirsch, C. et al., A highly specific pathogen-responsive promoter element from the immediate-early activated CMPG1 gene in Petroselinum crispum. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol., 2001, 26, 217–227.

  • Gurr, S. J. and Rushton, P. J., Engineering plants with increased disease resistance: what are we going to express? Trends Biotechnol., 2005, 23, 275–282.

  • Smirnova, O. G. and Kochetov, A. V., Promoters of plant genes responsive to pathogen invasion. Russ. J. Genet. Appl. Res., 2015, 5, 254–261.

  • Journot-Catalino, N. et al., The transcription factors WRKY11 and WRKY17 act as negative regulators of basal resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell, 2006, 18, 3289–3302.

  • Lyon, M. F. et al., A dominant mutation within the DNA-binding domain of the bZIP transcription factor Maf causes murine cataract and results in selective alteration in DNA binding. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2003, 12, 585–594.

  • Chaudhary, K., Chattopadhyay, A. and Pratap, D., The evolution of CRISPR/Cas9 and their cousins: hope or hype? Biotechnol. Lett., 2018, 40, 465–477.

  • Chaudhary, K., Chattopadhyay, A. and Pratap, D., Anti-CRISPR proteins: counterattack of phages on bacterial defence (CRISPR/Cas) system. J. Cell Physiol., 2018, 233, 57–59.

  • Joung, J. K. and Sander, J. D., TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2013, 14, 49–55.

  • Chaudhary, K., Pratap, D. and Sharma, P. K., Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs): an efficient tool for plant genome editing. Eng. Life Sci., 2016, 16, 330–337.

  • Baltes, N. J. and Voytas, D. F., Enabling plant synthetic biology through genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol., 2015, 33, 120–131.

  • Bortesi, L. and Fischer, R., The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv., 2015, 33, 41–52.

  • Tomita, N., Kashihara, N. and Morishita, R., Transcription factor decoyoligonucleotide-based therapeutic strategy for renal disease. Clin. Exp. Nephrol., 2007, 11, 7–17.

  • Cui, C. et al., Transcriptional regulation of gene expression by microRNAs as endogenous decoys of transcription factors. Cell. Physiol. Biochem., 2014, 33, 1698–1714.

  • Rad, S. M. et al., Transcription factor decoy: a pre-transcriptional approach for gene down regulation purpose in cancer. Tumour Biol., 2015, 36, 4871–4881.

  • Niu, Q. W. et al., Expression of artificial microRNAs in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana confers virus resistance. Nature Biotechnol., 2006, 24, 1420–1428.

  • Sablok, G. et al., Artificial microRNAs (amiRNAs) engineering – on how microRNA-based silencing methods have affected current plant silencing research. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2011, 406, 315–319.

  • Tiwari, M., Sharma, D. and Trivedi, P. K., Artificial microRNA mediated gene silencing in plants: progress and perspectives. Plant Mol. Biol., 2014, 86, 1–18.

  • Zhang, H. et al., Arabidopsis AtERF15 positively regulates immunity against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and Botrytis cinerea. Front. Plant Sci., 2015, 6, 686.

  • Liu, S. R. et al., MicroRNA-mediated gene silencing in plant defence and viral counter-defence. Front. Microbiol., 2017, 8, 1801.

  • Samad, A. F. A. et al., Micro RNA and transcription factor: key players in plant regulatory network. Front. Plant Sci., 2017, 8, 565.

  • Chen, Y. J. et al., The barley HvNAC6 transcription factor affects ABA accumulation and promotes basal resistance against powdery mildew. Plant Mol. Biol., 2013, 83, 577–590.

  • Szittya, G. et al., Low temperature inhibits RNA silencing-mediated defence by the control of siRNA generation. EMBO J., 2003, 22, 633–640.

  • Qiu, S., Adema, C. M. and Lane, T., A computational study of off-target effects of RNA interference. Nucleic Acids Res., 2005, 33, 1834–1847.

  • So′s-Hegedus, A. et al., Active RNA silencing at low temperature indicates distinct pathways for antisense-mediated gene-silencing in potato. Plant Mol. Biol., 2005, 59, 595–602.

  • Yun, J. et al., Small interfering peptides as a novel way of transcriptional control. Plant Signal Behav., 2008, 3, 615–617.

  • Seo, P. J. et al., Competitive inhibition of transcription factors by small interfering peptides. Trends Plant Sci., 2011, 16, 541–549.

  • Seo, P. J., Park, M. J. and Park, C. M., Alternative splicing of transcription factors in plant responses to low temperature stress: mechanisms and functions. Planta, 2013, 237, 1415–1424.

  • Seo, P. J. et al., Targeted inactivation of transcription factors by overexpression of their truncated forms in plants. Plant J., 2012, 72, 162–172.

  • Liu, D. F. et al., The rice ERF transcription factor OsERF922 negatively regulates resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae and salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot., 2012, 63, 3899–3912.

  • Yoshii, M. et al., Disruption of a novel gene for a NAC-domain protein in rice confers resistance to rice dwarf virus. Plant J., 2009, 57, 615–625.

  • Jirschitzka, J. et al., Learning from nature: new approaches to the metabolic engineering of plant defence pathways. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2013, 24, 320–328.

  • Grotewold, E., Transcription factors for predictive plant metabolic engineering: are we there yet. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2008, 19, 138–144.

  • Durai, S. et al., Zinc finger nucleases: custom-designed molecular scissors for genome engineering of plant and mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 2005, 33, 5978–5990.

  • Liu, W., Yuan, J. S. and Stewart Jr, C. N., Advanced genetic tools for plant biotechnology. Nature Rev. Genet., 2013, 14, 781–793.

  • Liu, W. and Stewart Jr, C. N., Plant synthetic promoters and transcription factors. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2016, 37, 36–44.

  • Boch, J. and Bonas, U., Xanthomonas AvrBs3 family-type III effectors: discovery and function. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 2010, 48, 419–436.

  • Kabadi, A. M. and Gersbach, C. A., Engineering synthetic TALE and CRISPR/Cas9 transcription factors for regulating gene expression. Methods, 2014, 69, 188–197.

  • Jinek, M. et al., A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 2012, 337, 816–821.

  • Lowder, L. G. et al., A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol., 2015, 169, 971–985.

  • Piatek, A. et al., RNA-guided transcriptional regulation in planta via synthetic dCas9-based transcription factors. Plant Biotechnol. J., 2015, 13, 578–589.

  • Alagoz, Y., Manipulating the biosynthesis of bioactive compound alkaloids for next-generation metabolic engineering in opium poppy using CRISPR-Cas 9 genome editing technology. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 30910.

  • Tsuda, K. and Somssich, I. E., Transcriptional networks in plant immunity. New Phytol., 2015, 206, 932–947.

  • Takatsuji, H., Development of disease-resistant rice using regulatory components of induced disease resistance. Front. Plant Sci., 2014, 5, 630.


Abstract Views: 290

PDF Views: 70




  • Targeting Transcription Factors for Plant Disease Resistance:Shifting Paradigm

Abstract Views: 290  |  PDF Views: 70

Authors

Anirudha Chattopadhyay
Department of Plant Pathology, S.D. Agricultural University, S. K. Nagar 385 506, India
Jyotika Purohit
Department of Plant Pathology, S.D. Agricultural University, S. K. Nagar 385 506, India
Kapil K. Tiwari
Bioscience Research Centre, S.D. Agricultural University, S. K. Nagar 385 506, India
Rupesh Deshmukh
National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali 140 306, India

Abstract


Transcription factors (TFs) are regulatory proteins that have the ability to alter targeted gene expression either solely by themselves or as a part of the protein complex. Many such TFs have significant regulatory role in plant defence. Being master switches for gene regulation, they become the unique candidates for targeting functional hub and dynamic networks and nodes of different defence signalling pathways in plant. Of many approaches transgenic overexpression or down-regulation of TFs is widely adopted, mainly to characterize their vital role in disease resistance; however their practical utilization remains limited in breeding programmes. Alternatively, exogenous application of synthetic chemicals/biocontrol agents is also efficient to regulate their expression, but not suc-cessful in the field. Hence, the focus has now shifted towards synthetic promoters (SPs) and synthetic tran-scription factors (STFs) to modulate gene expression. They have greater advantages over the natural ones for their target sequence-specificity, speed, and pre-cise activity. Therefore, manipulation of plant defence regulatory networks by utilizing SPs or STFs repre-sents a new era for synthetically modified crops without negative aspects of the existing biotechnology. This dynamic shift in approach from conventional to modern, transgenic to non-transgenic for manipulat-ing plant defence is discussed in this article, with the aim of their commercial application in crop improve-ment.

Keywords


Transcription Factors, Plant Defence, Peptide Interference, Synthetic Promoters, Gene Expression.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi10%2F1598-1607