Open Access
Subscription Access
Genetic Modification Technology
The article by Datta et al.1 (henceforth referred to as 17 authors) states that it deals with negative perceptions of genetic modification technology in general, as also discussed in a recent review by Kesavan and Swaminathan2 (henceforth PCK–MSS paper). The latter publication provides concrete data and valid scientific references for most of the important statements, hence their criticisms are unfounded and invalid.
User
Font Size
Information
- Datta, S. et al., Curr. Sci., 2019, 117(3), 390–394.
- Kesavan, P. C. and Swaminathan, M. S., Curr. Sci., 2018, 115(10), 1876–1883; doi:10.18520/cs/v115/i10/1876-1883.
- Séralini, G. E. et al., Food Chem. Toxicol., 2012, 50, 4221–4231; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/so278691512005637
- Séralini, G. E. et al., Environ. Sci. Eur., 2014, 26(14); doi:10.1186/s12302-0140014-5.
- Scientific American, Do seed companies control GM crop research?, 2009; https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic le/do-seed-companies-control-gm-crop-research/
- Schubert, D. A., Hidden epidemic. GMO Science, 17 March 2018; https://www.gmoscience.org/hidden-epidemic/
- Avila-Vazquez, M., Maturano, E., Etchegoyen, A., Difilippo, F. S. and Maclean, B., Int. J. Clin. Med., 2017, 8, 73–85.
- Kranthi, K., Fertilizers gave high yields, Bt-only provided cover. Cotton Statistics and News, 2016–2017, No. 39, 27 December 2016.
- Komarlingam, M. S., Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(10), 1988–1989.
- Zhang, L., Rana, I., Shaffer, R. M., Taioli, E. and Sheppard, L., Mutat. Res., 2019, 781, 186–206; doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.02.001.
- Hopf, H. et al., R. Soc. Open Sci., 2019, 6 190161; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190161
- Iyengar, S. and Massey, D. S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2019, 116(16), 7656–7661; www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1805868115
Abstract Views: 259
PDF Views: 86