The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


A study was undertaken to evaluate the retention (RF and RM) and separation (ΔRF, RαF , α and RS) of buprofezin (B), flubendiamide (F) and imidacloprid (I) using n-hexane-acetone (6.5 : 3.5 v/v) in the case of NPHPTLC and methanol-water (8 : 2 v/v) for RP-HPTLC as mobile phase. The study revealed that increasing the acetone content in NP-HPTLC and decreasing the water content in RP-HPTLC resulted in high resolution with increase in RF values for B, F and I. ΔRF > 0.04 and RS > 1.5 were achieved for all pairs of compounds (ΔRF(B–F) = 0.35, ΔRF(F–I) = 0.19, ΔRF(B–I) = 0.54, RS(B–F) = 4.12, RS(F–I) = 7.34, RS(B–I) = 2.02 using NP-HPTLC; ΔRF(F–B) = 0.23, ΔRF(I–F) = 0.26, ΔRF(I–B) = 0.49, RS(F–B) = 2.63, RS(I–F) = 2.97, RS(I–B) = 5.92 using RP-HPTLC). Imidacloprid was adsorbed strongly on NP-HPTLC layer and buprofezin on RP-HPTLC layer, as indicated by their high RM values. The maximum absorption of UV for B, F and I was found to be 252, 242 and 276 nm respectively. Stability analysis indicated that these compounds were stable up to 6 h in methanol and on the plates (NP-HPTLC and RPHPTLC layers). This protocol is useful for toxicologists to detect a mixture of these insecticides in forensic as well as environmental samples.

Keywords

Detection and Separation, Human Toxicity, Insecticides, Thin-Layer Chromatography.
User
Notifications
Font Size