Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Research Productivity and International Collaboration of Top Indonesian Universities


Affiliations
1 Islamic Studies and Department of Islamic Education, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Islamic University of Indonesia, Jl. Demangan Baru No. 24 Yogyakarta, D.I. Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
2 Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Pedagogy, State University of Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No. 1, Yogyakarta, D.I. Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
3 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Socio-Cultural Sciences, Islamic University of Indonesia, Jl. Kaliurang KM 14,5 Kaliurang, Sleman, D.I. Yogyakarta 55584, Indonesia
4 Department of Islamic Economics, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Islamic University of Indonesia, Jl. Kaliurang KM 14,5 Kaliurang, Sleman, D.I. Yogyakarta 55584, Indonesia
 

This article analyses research productivity and international collaboration of top Indonesian universities. The data were collected from Scopus with regard to number of documents, authors, affiliation and country partners in research. The top ten Indonesian universities were then chosen for analysis. The results suggest that top universities in Indonesia published articles in peerreviewed journals earlier too, but showed slow progress before 2000. After 2010 the number of documents increased significantly, especially among the three largest Indonesian universities, i.e. Bandung Institute of Technology, University of Indonesia and Gadjah Mada University. These universities also showed higher productivity of their authors. The top Indonesian universities collaborated with universities in developed countries such as Japan, the United States, The Netherlands, Australia and Germany. There was collaboration with neighbouring countries in Southeast Asia, mainly with Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore. Based on these findings, this article suggests some insights to improve the quantity and quality of publications from Indonesian universities.

Keywords

Bibliometric Assessment, International Collaboration, Research Productivity, Top Universities.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ministry of Education and Culture, Operational Guide to Credit Points for Lecturer’s Academic Position Promotion, Directorate of Higher Education, Ministry of Education and Culture, Jakarta, 2014.

  • Ministry of Research Technology and Higher Education, Strength of 50 Indonesian Academic Institutions: Profile of Academic Publication in Scopus, Directorate of Research Empowerment and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Jakarta, 2016.

  • Beattie, V. and Goodacre, A., Publishing patterns within the UK accounting and finance academic community. Br. Acc. Rev., 2004, 36(1), 7–44.

  • Vieira, E. S. and Gomes, J. A. N. F., A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(2), 587–600.

  • Abolghassemi Fakhree, M. A. and Jouyban, A., Scientometric analysis of the major Iranian medical universities. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(1), 205–220.

  • Megnigbeto, E., Scientific publishing in Benin as seen from Scopus. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(3), 911–928.

  • Zhang, L., The impact of data source on the ranking of computer scientists based on citation indicators: a comparison of Web of Science and Scopus. Issues Sci. Technol. Librarian., 2014.

  • Manh, H. D., Scientific publications in Vietnam as seen from Scopus during 1996–2013. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(1), 83–95.

  • Matcharashvili, T., Tsveraidze, Z., Sborshchikovi, A. and Matcharashvili, T., The importance of bibliometric indicators for the analysis of research performance in Georgia. Trames A J. Human. Soc. Sci., 2015, 19(3), 345–356.

  • Chiware, E. and Skelly, L., Publishing patterns at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology. S. Afr. J. Sci., 2016, 112(1/2), 1–6.

  • Elango, B. and Ho, Y.-S., A bibliometric analysis of highly cited papers from India in Science Citation Index Expanded. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(8), 1653–1658.

  • Kumar, S. and Mohd. Jan, J., Research collaboration networks of two OIC nations: comparative study between Turkey and Malaysia in the field of ‘Energy Fuels’, 2009–2011. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(1), 387–414.

  • Pinto, M., Escalona, M. I., Pulgarin, A. and Uribe-Tirado, A., The scientific production of Ibero-American authors on information literacy (1985–2013). Scientometrics, 2015, 102(2), 1555–1576.

  • Gupta, B. M. and Dhawan, S. M., Status of India in science and technology as reflected in its publication output in the Scopus international database, 1996–2006. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(2), 473–490.

  • Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Miguel, S. and de Moya-Anegón, F., What factors affect the visibility of Argentinian publications in humanities and social sciences in Scopus? Some evidence beyond the geographic realm of research. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1), 789–810.

  • Mamtora, J., Wolstenholme, J. K. and Haddow, G., Environmental sciences research in northern Australia, 2000–2011: a bibliometric analysis within the context of a national research assessment exercise. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(1), 265–281.

  • Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Zacca-Gonzalez, G., Vargas-Quesada, B. and Moya-Anegon, F., Latin American scientific output in Public Health: combined analysis using bibliometric, socioeconomic and health indicators. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1), 609–628.

  • Arencibia-Jorge, R. and de Moya-Anegon, F., Challenges in the study of Cuban scientific output. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(3), 723–737.

  • Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Arencibia-Jorge, R., de Moya-Anegon, F. and Corera-Álvarez, E., Somes patterns of Cuban scientific publication in Scopus: the current situation and challenges. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(3), 779–794.

  • Bartol, T., Budimir, G., Dekleva-Smrekar, D., Pusnik, M. and Juznic, P., Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2), 1491–1504.

  • Villaseñor, E. A., Arencibia-Jorge, R. and Carrillo-Calvet, H., Multiparametric characterization of scientometric performance profiles assisted by neural networks: a study of Mexican higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 2017, 110(1), 77–104.

  • Cheol Shin, J., Jeung Lee, S. and Kim, Y., Research collaboration across higher education systems: maturity, language use, and regional differences. Stud. High. Educ., 2013, 38(3), 425–440.

  • Prakasan, E. R., Mohan, L., Girap, P., Surwase, G., Kademani, B. S. and Bhanumurthy, K., Scientometric facts on international collaborative Indian publications. Curr. Sci., 2014, 106(2), 166–169.

  • Knobel, M., Patricia Simoes, T. and de Brito Cruz, C. H., International collaborations between research universities: experiences and best practices. Stud. High. Educ., 2013, 38(3), 405–424).

  • Tadaki, M. and Tremewan, C., Reimagining internationalization in higher education: international consortia as a transformative space? Stud. High. Educ., 2013, 38(3), 367–387.

  • Hood, W. W. and Wilson, C. S., Informetric studies using databases: opportunities and challenges. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(3), 587–608.

  • Prathap, G. and Ratnavelu, K., Research performance evaluation of leading higher education institutions in Malaysia. Curr. Sci., 2015, 109(6), 1159-1164.

  • Sadjuga, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education Policy on National and International Journal, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, Jakarta, 2017.

  • Darmadji, A., Prasojo, L. D., Riyanto, Y., Kusumaningrum, F. A., and Andriansyah, Y., Publications of Islamic University of Indonesia in Scopus database: a bibliometric assessment. Collnet J. Sci. Inf. Manage., 2018, 12(1), 109–131.

  • Ynalveza, M. A. and Shrum, W. M., Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resourceconstrained research institutions in a developing country. Res. Policy, 2011, 40, 204–216.

  • Wang, C., Cheng, Z. and Huang, Z., Analysis on the co-authoring in the field of management in China: based on social network analysis. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 2017, 12(6), 149–160.

  • Yonezawa, A., Strategies for the emerging global higher education market in East Asia: a comparative study of Singapore, Malaysia and Japan. Global. Soc. Educ., 2007, 5(1), 125–136.

  • Tham, S. Y. and Kam, A. J. Y., Internationalising higher education: comparing the challenges of different higher education institutions in Malaysia. Asia Pac. J. Educ., 2008, 28(4), 353–367.

  • Mok, K. H., Varieties of regulatory regimes in Asia: the liberalization of the higher education market and changing governance in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. Pac. Rev., 2008, 21(2), 147–170.

  • Azman, N., Sirat, M. and Pang, V., Managing and mobilising talent in Malaysia: issues, challenges and policy implications for Malaysian universities. J. High. Educ. Policy Manage., 2016, 38(3), 316–332.

  • Jung, J., Higher education research as a field of study in South Korea: Inward but starting to look outward. High. Educ. Policy, 2015, 28(4), 495–515.

  • Ylikoski, T. and Kivela, S., Spatiality in higher education: a case study in integrating pedagogy, community engagement, and regional development. Int. J. Innov. Learn., 2017, 21(3), 348–363.


Abstract Views: 255

PDF Views: 79




  • Research Productivity and International Collaboration of Top Indonesian Universities

Abstract Views: 255  |  PDF Views: 79

Authors

Ahmad Darmadji
Islamic Studies and Department of Islamic Education, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Islamic University of Indonesia, Jl. Demangan Baru No. 24 Yogyakarta, D.I. Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
Lantip Diat Prasojo
Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Pedagogy, State University of Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No. 1, Yogyakarta, D.I. Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
Fitri Ayu Kusumaningrum
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Socio-Cultural Sciences, Islamic University of Indonesia, Jl. Kaliurang KM 14,5 Kaliurang, Sleman, D.I. Yogyakarta 55584, Indonesia
Yuli Andriansyah
Department of Islamic Economics, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Islamic University of Indonesia, Jl. Kaliurang KM 14,5 Kaliurang, Sleman, D.I. Yogyakarta 55584, Indonesia

Abstract


This article analyses research productivity and international collaboration of top Indonesian universities. The data were collected from Scopus with regard to number of documents, authors, affiliation and country partners in research. The top ten Indonesian universities were then chosen for analysis. The results suggest that top universities in Indonesia published articles in peerreviewed journals earlier too, but showed slow progress before 2000. After 2010 the number of documents increased significantly, especially among the three largest Indonesian universities, i.e. Bandung Institute of Technology, University of Indonesia and Gadjah Mada University. These universities also showed higher productivity of their authors. The top Indonesian universities collaborated with universities in developed countries such as Japan, the United States, The Netherlands, Australia and Germany. There was collaboration with neighbouring countries in Southeast Asia, mainly with Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore. Based on these findings, this article suggests some insights to improve the quantity and quality of publications from Indonesian universities.

Keywords


Bibliometric Assessment, International Collaboration, Research Productivity, Top Universities.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi4%2F653-658