Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Use of Molecular-Based Approach in Resolving Subspecies Ambiguity of the Rescued Tiger Cubs from Arunachal Pradesh, India and their Relationship with Other Population


Affiliations
1 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India
2 Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow 226 301, India
3 Amity Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Amity University, Noida 201 313, India
 

Genetic approach is often suggested for resolving taxonomic ambiguities in areas where there have been overlaps in distribution of a species or subspecies. The Northeast part of India is one of the identified biodiversity hotspots, having the junction of Palearctic and Indomalyan realms with dense canopy forests and rugged terrains. The distribution range of two tiger subspecies, i.e. Bengal tiger and northern Indo- Chinese tiger, overlaps with each other in this region. The government authorities rescued three tiger cubs from Angrim Valley Village, Arunachal Pradesh, Northeast India in November 2012. We carried out a comprehensive genetic study on the rescued cubs to elucidate their subspecies status and determine their relationship with the remnant tiger populations. Our findings based on 3661 base pair of mitochondrial DNA sequence spanning across six mitochondrial genes (ND1, ND2, ND5, ND6, 12S rRNA and CytB) and non-coding control region (CR) suggest the Bengal tiger ancestry of the rescued tiger cubs. Further, comparison of mitochondrial haplotype with other Bengal tiger populations reveals that the haplotype reported for the rescued cub is novel and has close affinity to the northeast tiger populations of India. However, detailed population assignment to infer the source of origin was not possible due to lack of genetic data for all Bengal tiger populations. The present study attempts an assessment of tiger status that has resulted in identification of another tiger occupied landscape in India (Dibang Tiger Reserve).

Keywords

Bengal Tiger, DNA Sequencing, Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, Subspecies.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Butchart, S. H. et al., Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science, 2010, 328, 1164–1168.
  • Hoffmann, M. et al., The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science, 2010, 330, 1503–1509.
  • Woinarski, J. C., Burbidge, A. A. and Harrison, P. L., Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: Decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2015, 112, 4531–4540.
  • Cardillo, M. et al., Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science, 2005, 309, 1239–1241.
  • Luo, S.-J. et al., Phylogeography and genetic ancestry of tigers (Panthera tigris). PLoS Biol., 2004, 2, e442.
  • Mondol, S., Karanth, K. U. and Ramakrishnan, U., Why the Indian subcontinent holds the key to global tiger recovery. PLoS Genet., 2009, 5, e1000585.
  • Goodrich, J. et al., Panthera tigris. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2015: E. T15955a50659951.
  • Jhala, Y., Qureshi, Q. and Gopal, R., The status of Tigers in India, National Tiger Conservation Authority, New Delhi and the Wild-life Institute of India, Dehradun, 2015.
  • Panwar, H., Project tiger: The reserves, the tigers and their future. Tigers of the World: the Biology, Biopolitics, Management and Conservation of an Endangered Species, Noyes Publications, New Jersey, 1987, pp. 110–117.
  • Khoshoo, T. N., Conservation of India’s endangered mega animals: Tiger and lion. Curr. Sci., 1997, 73, 830–842.
  • Rodgers, W. and Panwar, H., Planning a wildlife protected area network in India, FAO, Dehradun, India, 1988.
  • Singh, R., Chauhan, D. S., Mishra, S., Krausman, P. R. and Goyal, S. P., Tiger density in a tropical lowland forest in the eastern Himalayan mountains. SpringerPlus, 2014, 3, 462.
  • Lynam, A. and Nowell, K., Panthera tigris ssp. Corbetti. IUCN.
  • Jhala, Y., Gopal, R. and Qureshi, Q., Status of tigers, co-predators, and prey in India, 2008.
  • Jhala, Y., Qureshi, Q., Gopal, R. and Sinha, P., Status of the tigers, co-predators, and prey in India, 2010. National Tiger Conservation Authority, Government of India, New Delhi and Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. TR 2011/003, p. 302.
  • Irwin, D. M., Kocher, T. D. and Wilson, A. C., Evolution of the cytochrome B gene of mammals. J. Mol. Evol., 1991, 32, 128–144.
  • Wasser, S. K., Shedlock, A. M., Comstock, K., Ostrander, E. A., Mutayoba, B. and Stephens, M., Assigning african elephant DNA to geographic region of origin: applications to the ivory trade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, 101, 14847–14852.
  • Luo, S.-J. et al., Subspecies genetic assignments of worldwide captive tigers increase conservation value of captive populations. Curr. Biol., 2008, 18, 592–596.
  • Sharma, R., Stuckas, H., Bhaskar, R., Rajput, S., Khan, I., Goyal, S. P. and Tiedemann, R., MtDna indicates profound population structure in Indian tiger (Panthera tigris tigris). Conserv. Genet., 2009, 10, 909–914.
  • Driscoll, C. A., Yamaguchi, N., Bar-Gal, G. K., Roca, A. L., Luo, S., Macdonald, D. W. and O’Brien, S. J., Mitochondrial phylogeography illuminates the origin of the extinct caspian tiger and its relationship to the amur tiger. PLOS ONE, 2009, 4, e4125.
  • Mu-Yeong, L. et al., Subspecific status of the Korean tiger inferred by ancient DNA analysis. Anim. Syst., Evol. Diversity, 2012, 28, 48.
  • Singh, S. K. et al., Tigers of sundarbans in india: Is the population a separate conservation unit? PLOS ONE, 2015, 10, e0118846.
  • Hall, T., Bioedit software, version 5.0. 9. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 1999.
  • Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. and Kumar, S., Mega6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol., 2013, 30, 2725–2729.
  • Keane, T., Creevey, C., Pentony, M., Naughton, T. J. and McInerney, J., Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that ad hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified. BMC Evol. Biol., 2006, 6, 29–46.
  • Posada, D. and Buckley, T. R., Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: Advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol., 2004, 53, 793–808.
  • Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H. and Yano, T.-A., Dating of the humanape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol., 1985, 22, 160–174.
  • Johnsingh, A. and Goyal, S., Tiger conservation in India: the past, present and the future. Indian For., 2005, 131, 1279–1296.
  • Karanth, K. U. and Nichols, J. D., Ecological status and conservation of tigers in India. Final technical report (February 1995 to January 2000), 2000.
  • Datta, A., Anand, M. and Naniwadekar, R., Empty forests: Large carnivore and prey abundance in Namdapha National Park, North-east India. Biol. Conserv., 2008, 141, 1429–1435.

Abstract Views: 272

PDF Views: 75




  • Use of Molecular-Based Approach in Resolving Subspecies Ambiguity of the Rescued Tiger Cubs from Arunachal Pradesh, India and their Relationship with Other Population

Abstract Views: 272  |  PDF Views: 75

Authors

Puneet Pandey
Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India
Deepa Goel
Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow 226 301, India
Randeep Singh
Amity Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Amity University, Noida 201 313, India
Sujeet Kumar Singh
Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India
Surendra Prakash Goyal
Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India

Abstract


Genetic approach is often suggested for resolving taxonomic ambiguities in areas where there have been overlaps in distribution of a species or subspecies. The Northeast part of India is one of the identified biodiversity hotspots, having the junction of Palearctic and Indomalyan realms with dense canopy forests and rugged terrains. The distribution range of two tiger subspecies, i.e. Bengal tiger and northern Indo- Chinese tiger, overlaps with each other in this region. The government authorities rescued three tiger cubs from Angrim Valley Village, Arunachal Pradesh, Northeast India in November 2012. We carried out a comprehensive genetic study on the rescued cubs to elucidate their subspecies status and determine their relationship with the remnant tiger populations. Our findings based on 3661 base pair of mitochondrial DNA sequence spanning across six mitochondrial genes (ND1, ND2, ND5, ND6, 12S rRNA and CytB) and non-coding control region (CR) suggest the Bengal tiger ancestry of the rescued tiger cubs. Further, comparison of mitochondrial haplotype with other Bengal tiger populations reveals that the haplotype reported for the rescued cub is novel and has close affinity to the northeast tiger populations of India. However, detailed population assignment to infer the source of origin was not possible due to lack of genetic data for all Bengal tiger populations. The present study attempts an assessment of tiger status that has resulted in identification of another tiger occupied landscape in India (Dibang Tiger Reserve).

Keywords


Bengal Tiger, DNA Sequencing, Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, Subspecies.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi11%2F2368-2373