Open Access
Subscription Access
Copycats and Impostors in Science Publishing:The Case of Current science
On 2 July 2017, an e-mail was received from a journal claiming to be Current Science, inviting prospective authors to submit papers with the promise of a two week acceptance for the July 2017 issue. Apart from the name, other aspects appeared to be legitimate, such as the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor, name of the editor-in-chief (EIC) and a physical postal address.
User
Font Size
Information
- Teixeira da Silva, J. A. and Dobránszki, J., Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(8), 1623–1626.
- Seethapathy, G. S., Santhosh Kumar, J. U. and Hareesha, A. S., Curr. Sci., 2016, 111(11), 1759–1764.
- Dadkhah, M., Maliszewski, T. and Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol., 2016, 12(3), 353–362.
- Janodia, M. D., Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(12), 2361–2362.
- Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2017 (in press); doi:10.1007/s11948-0179905-3.
- Teixeira da Silva, J. A. and Bernès, S., Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2017 (in press); doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9873-7.
Abstract Views: 239
PDF Views: 73