Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Developing Sustainable Models of Arsenic-Mitigation Technologies in the Middle-Ganga Plain in India


Affiliations
1 Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Ave, Montclair, New Jersey 07043, United States
2 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Ave, Montclair, New Jersey 07043, United States
 

This study seeks to understand factors that guide the decision-making process to adopt and implement the available arsenic-mitigation technologies in rural areas in the middle-Ganga Plain in India. A total of 340 households comprising 2500 people were surveyed. Socio-economic and demographic factors, water and sanitation status, time spent and distance travelled to collect water, arsenic awareness, willingness to pay (WTP) for arsenic-free water, people's trust in others and in institutions, social capital in communities, and preferences for sustainable arsenic-mitigation options were investigated. Arsenic treatment units (filters) and piped water supply systems were the most preferred sustainable arsenic-mitigation options in the surveyed villages. Less preferred arsenic-mitigation options include deep tube wells, dug wells, and rainwater harvesting systems. Binary logistic regression models for each arsenic-mitigation option were produced. Arsenic awareness, WTP, trust in agencies, trust in institutions and social capital were found to be the most significant factors for decision-making for preferring one arsenic-mitigation technology over the others. We recommend a mixed model of two arsenic-mitigation options for the studied individuals, which could be a sustainable arsenic-mitigation option for them, considering their socio-economic and demographic conditions. Existing institutions should be strengthened, agencies empowered, and communities enlightened about arsenic problems.

Keywords

Arsenic-Mitigation, Arsenic Treatment Unit, Deep Tube Well, Dug Wells, Piped Water Supply, Rainwater Harvesting System.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Singh, S. K. et al., Groundwater arsenic contamination and associated health risks in Bihar, India. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2014, 8(1), 49–60.

  • Singh, S. K. and Vedwan, N., Mapping composite vulnerability to groundwater arsenic contamination: an analytical framework and a case study in India. Nat. Hazards., 2015, 75(2), 1883–1908.

  • Singh, S. K., Groundwater arsenic contamination in the MiddleGangetic Plain, Bihar (India): the danger arrived. Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci., 2015, 4(2), 70–76.

  • Singh, S. K., Brachfeld, S. A. and Taylor, R. W., Evaluating hydrogeological and topographic controls on groundwater arsenic contamination in the mid-Gangetic Plain in India: towards developing sustainable arsenic mitigation models. In Advances in Water Security: Emerging Sensing Issues for Coastal Groundwater Quality and Quantity (ed. Fares, A.), Springer International Publishing, New York, USA, 2016.

  • Nordstrom, D. K., Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water. Science (Washington), 2002, 296(5576), 2143–2145.

  • Singh, S. K., Assessing and Mapping Vulnerability and Risk Perceptions to Groundwater Arsenic Contamination: Towards Developing Sustainable Arsenic Mitigation Models. Montclair State University, USA, 2015.

  • Mukherjee, A., Scanlon, B. R., Fryar, A. E., Saha, D., Ghosh, A., Chowdhuri, S. and Mishra, R., Solute chemistry and arsenic fate in aquifers between the Himalayan foothills and Indian craton (including central Gangetic plain): influence of geology and geomorphology. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2012, 90, 283–302.

  • Singh, S., Arsenic Contamination in Water, Soil, and Food Materials in Bihar, Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany, 2011.

  • Singh, S. K. and Ghosh, A. K., Entry of arsenic into food material – a case study. World Appl. Sci. J., 2011, 13(2), 385–390.

  • Saha, D., Arsenic groundwater contamination in parts of middle Ganga plain, Bihar. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(6), 753–755.

  • Chakraborti, D. et al., Arsenic groundwater contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: a future danger? Environ. Health Persp., 2003, 111(9), 1194.

  • Singh, S. K. and Ghosh, A. K., Health risk assessment due to groundwater arsenic contamination: children are at high risk. Human Ecol. Risk Assess.: An Int. J., 2012, 18(4), 751–766.

  • Bundschuh, J. et al., Emerging mitigation needs and sustainable options for solving the arsenic problems of rural and isolated urban areas in Latin America – a critical analysis. Water Res., 2010, 44(19), 5828–5845.

  • Kabir, A. and Howard, G., Sustainability of arsenic mitigation in Bangladesh: results of a functionality survey. Int. J. Environ. Health Res., 2007, 17(3), 207–218.

  • Shafiquzzaman, M., Azam, M. S., Mishima, I. and Nakajima, J., Technical and social evaluation of arsenic mitigation in rural Bangladesh. J. Health. Popul. Nutr., 2009, 27(5), 674.

  • Ahmad, S. A. et al., Sociocultural aspects of arsenicosis in Bangladesh: community perspective. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A, 2007, 42(12), 1945–1958.

  • Hossain, M. A. et al., Million dollar arsenic removal plants in West Bengal, India: useful or not? Water Quality Res. J. Canada, 2006, 41(2), 216–225.

  • Brinkel, J., Khan, M. H. and Kraemer, A., A systematic review of arsenic exposure and its social and mental health effects with special reference to Bangladesh. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health, 2009, 6(5), 1609–1619.

  • CGWB, Arsenic Contamination in Ground Water of Bihar, Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Mid-Eastern Region: Patna, Bihar, India, 2010.

  • CGWB, NIH Mitigation and Remedy of Groundwater Arsenic Menace in India: A Vision Document, National Institute of Hydrology (NIH), Roorky and Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Government of India, India, 2010.

  • IBM, IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 21.0. In IBM Corp Armonk, New York, 2012.

  • Hosmer Jr, D. W., Lemeshow, S. and Sturdivant, R. X., Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons, 2013, vol. 398.

  • Park, H., An introduction to logistic regression: from basic concepts to interpretation with particular attention to nursing domain. J. Kor. Acad. Nursing, 2013, 43(2), 154–164.

  • Park, J.-S. et al., Epicardial adipose tissue thickness is a predictor for plaque vulnerability in patients with significant coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis, 2013, 226(1), 134–139.

  • Ozdemir, A., Using a binary logistic regression method and GIS for evaluating and mapping the groundwater spring potential in the Sultan Mountains (Aksehir, Turkey). J. Hydrol., 2011, 405(1), 123–136.

  • Warner, R. M., Applied Statistics: From Bivariate through Multivariate Techniques, Sage, 2012.

  • McCarthy, S., Robson, P., Livingstone, M., Kiely, M., Flynn, A., Cran, G. and Gibney, M., Associations between daily food intake and excess adiposity in Irish adults: towards the development of food-based dietary guidelines for reducing the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Int. J. Obesity, 2006, 30(6), 993–1002.

  • Bamaiyi, P. H. et al., Case–control study on risk factors associated with Brucella Melitensis in goat farms in Peninsular Malaysia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 2014, 46(5), 739–745.

  • Wikipedia Other Backward Class. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_Backward_Class (6 January 2013).

  • GoI, Report of the Backward Classes Commission-Part I, National Commission for Backward Classes, Government of India (GoI): New Delhi, India, 1980.

  • GoI, Report of the Backward Classes Commission, National Commission for Backward Classess Government of India (GoI): New Delhi, India, 1980.

  • Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, G. Constitutional Provisions. http://socialjustice.nic.in/ (3 February 2013).

  • Wikipedia Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheduled_Castes_and_Scheduled_Tribes (3 February 2013).

  • Anganwadi Anganwadi: Combat Child Hunger and malnutrition Center. http://aanganwadi.org (1 August 2013).

  • Janssens, W., van de Gaag, J. and Gunning, J. W., The role of social capital in early childhood development: evidence from rural India. Amsterdam Institute of International Development, 2004.

  • Fouillet, C., Augsburg, B. In Spread of the Self-Help Groups Banking Linkage Programme in India, International Conference on Rural Finance Research, Moving Results, FAO and IFAD, Rome, 2007, 2007.

  • Kulhari, M., Women and Our Panchayati Raj System. Pinnacle Technology, 2011.

  • Wikipedia Panchayati raj. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panchayati_raj (6 Februrary 2013).

  • Hussam, A. and Munir, A. K., A simple and effective arsenic filter based on composite iron matrix: development and deployment studies for groundwater of Bangladesh. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A, 2007, 42(12), 1869–1878.

  • Saha, D., Dwivedi, S. and Sahu, S., Arsenic in ground water in parts of middle Ganga Plain in Bihar – an appraisal. Editorial Board, 2009, 24(2&3).

  • Ravenscroft, P., McArthur, J. and Hoque, M., Stable groundwater quality in deep aquifers of Southern Bangladesh: the case against sustainable abstraction. Sci. Total Environ., 2013, 454, 627–638.

  • Shibasaki, N., Lei, P. and Kamata, A., Evaluation of deep groundwater development for arsenic mitigation in western Bangladesh. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A, 2007, 42(12), 1919–1932.

  • Winkel, L. H. et al., Arsenic pollution of groundwater in Vietnam exacerbated by deep aquifer exploitation for more than a century. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2011, 108(4), 1246–1251.

  • Hira-Smith, M. M. et al., Arsenic concentrations and bacterial contamination in a pilot shallow dugwell program in West Bengal, India. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A, 2007, 42(1), 89–95.

  • Ahmed, M. F. and Rahman, M. M., Water Supply & Sanitation: Rural and Low Income Urban Communities, ITN-Bangladesh, Centre for Water Supply and Waste Management, BUET, 2000.

  • Sutherland, D., Kabir, M. O. and Chowdhury, N. A., Rapid assessment of technologies for arsenic removal at the household level. In Proceedings Technology for Arsenic Removal for Drinking Water. Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology and the United Nations University (eds Feroze Ahmed, M. et al.), 5 May 2011, pp. 190–200.

  • Howard, G., Ahmed, M. F., Shamsuddin, A. J., Mahmud, S. G. and Deere, D., Risk assessment of arsenic mitigation options in Bangladesh. J. Health. Popul. Nutr., 2006, 24(3), 346.


Abstract Views: 241

PDF Views: 104




  • Developing Sustainable Models of Arsenic-Mitigation Technologies in the Middle-Ganga Plain in India

Abstract Views: 241  |  PDF Views: 104

Authors

Sushant K. Singh
Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Ave, Montclair, New Jersey 07043, United States
Robert W. Taylor
Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Ave, Montclair, New Jersey 07043, United States
Haiyan Su
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Ave, Montclair, New Jersey 07043, United States

Abstract


This study seeks to understand factors that guide the decision-making process to adopt and implement the available arsenic-mitigation technologies in rural areas in the middle-Ganga Plain in India. A total of 340 households comprising 2500 people were surveyed. Socio-economic and demographic factors, water and sanitation status, time spent and distance travelled to collect water, arsenic awareness, willingness to pay (WTP) for arsenic-free water, people's trust in others and in institutions, social capital in communities, and preferences for sustainable arsenic-mitigation options were investigated. Arsenic treatment units (filters) and piped water supply systems were the most preferred sustainable arsenic-mitigation options in the surveyed villages. Less preferred arsenic-mitigation options include deep tube wells, dug wells, and rainwater harvesting systems. Binary logistic regression models for each arsenic-mitigation option were produced. Arsenic awareness, WTP, trust in agencies, trust in institutions and social capital were found to be the most significant factors for decision-making for preferring one arsenic-mitigation technology over the others. We recommend a mixed model of two arsenic-mitigation options for the studied individuals, which could be a sustainable arsenic-mitigation option for them, considering their socio-economic and demographic conditions. Existing institutions should be strengthened, agencies empowered, and communities enlightened about arsenic problems.

Keywords


Arsenic-Mitigation, Arsenic Treatment Unit, Deep Tube Well, Dug Wells, Piped Water Supply, Rainwater Harvesting System.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi01%2F80-93