Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Privatization on Access to Higher Education Among Social and Income Groups in India


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Dalit Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper contributes to the issues related to the impact of privatization on access to higher education among social groups. STs and SCs are the only underrepresented groups in higher education. The expansion of higher education during 2007 and 2014 benefited OBCs most. STs and SCs are lowest beneficiaries. Privatization also benefited OBCs most. Publicly financed institutions serve STs and SCs most which shows inclusive character of such institutions. Disparities by social group exist even at a higher level of income which indicates that income alone does not determine access to private unaided institutions. The empirical evidences suggest that affirmative actions are inevitable make private unaided institutions inclusive.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 506

PDF Views: 0




  • Impact of Privatization on Access to Higher Education Among Social and Income Groups in India

Abstract Views: 506  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Khalid Khan
Indian Institute of Dalit Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India

Abstract


This paper contributes to the issues related to the impact of privatization on access to higher education among social groups. STs and SCs are the only underrepresented groups in higher education. The expansion of higher education during 2007 and 2014 benefited OBCs most. STs and SCs are lowest beneficiaries. Privatization also benefited OBCs most. Publicly financed institutions serve STs and SCs most which shows inclusive character of such institutions. Disparities by social group exist even at a higher level of income which indicates that income alone does not determine access to private unaided institutions. The empirical evidences suggest that affirmative actions are inevitable make private unaided institutions inclusive.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2017%2Fv59%2Fi1%2F164432