Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Educational Development in Blocks of Paschim Medinipur District (West Bengal) between 2005-2006 and 2012-2013:Panel Data Analysis through Education Index


Affiliations
1 Vidyasagar University, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Education is considered as a crucial factor in determining the level of social development of a region directly and the level of its economic development indirectly. Educational development being multi-faceted, this paper constructs a composite Education Index for the Blocks of Paschim Medinipur District (West Bengal, India) over the period 2005-2006 to 2012-2013. Education Index is observed to have high inter-block as well as high inter-temporal variations. These variations are explained by factors like social status of the people, urbanization, employment status and demographic structure in a panel data framework. Urbanization, social status of the people and demographic structure are statistically significant both partially and individually. Work Participation Rate is statistically significant partially but not individually.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ahlualia, I. and Z. Hussan (2004), Development Achievements and Challenges, Economic and Political Weekly, 39(36): 4013-4022.
  • Anand, S. and A. Sen (1994), Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement, Occasional Paper 12, Human Development Report Office, UNDP, New York; Reprinted in S. Fukuda-Parr and A.K. Shiv Kumar (Eds.), Readings in Human Development (2003), New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Bagchi, A.K. (1998), Studies on the Economy of West Bengal since Independence, Economic and Political Weekly, 33(47-48): 2973-2978.
  • Bagchi, K.K. and S. Sarkar (2003), Development of Social Sector in West Bengal: A Study in Inter-District Disparity, Indian Journal of Regional Science, 35(2): 115-130.
  • Banerjee, S. and S. Ray (1998), On Construction of District Development Index in West Bengal, Economic and Political Weekly, 33(47/48): 3019-3026.
  • Budescu, David V. (1993), Dominance Analysis, A New Approach to the Problem of Relative Importance of Predictors in Multiple Regression, Psychological Bulletin, 114(3): 542-551.
  • Dholakia, R. (2003), Regional Disparity in Economic and Human Development in India, Economic and Political Weekly, 38(39): 4166-4172.
  • Dreze, J. and A.K. Sen (1995), India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity, OUP.
  • Feldman, B. (2005), Relative Importance and Value, Unpublished Manuscript (Version 1.1, March 19), Online at http://www.prismanalytics.com/docs/RelativeImportance050319.pdf.
  • Government of India (for various years), Census of India 1991, 2001, 2011.
  • ---------- (for various years), National Human Development Report of India, New Delhi.
  • ---------- (for various years), District Statistical Hand Book of Paschim Medinipur District.
  • Government of West Bengal (for various years), Human Development Report of West Bengal.
  • Hamilton, D.C. (1987), Sometimes R2> ryx12 +ryx22 – Correlated Variables are not Always Redundant, The American Statistician, 41(2): 129-132.
  • ---------- (1988), Sometimes R2> ryx12 +ryx22 – Correlated Variables are not Always Redundant, The Reply, The American Statistician, 42(2): 90-91.
  • Ivanova, I., F. Arcelus and G. Srinivasan (2005), An Assessment of the Measurement Properties of the Human Development Index, Social Indicators Research, 46(2): 157-179.
  • Kruskal, W. (1987a), Relative Importance by Averaging over Ordering, The American Statistician, 41(1): 6-10.
  • ---------- (1987b), Correction to ‘Relative Importance and Value, The American Statistician, 41(4): 341.
  • Kruskal, W. and R. Majors (1989), Concepts of Relative Importance in Recent Scientific Literature, The American Statistician, 43(1): 2-6.
  • Kumar, V. (2007), Development Disparities in Himachal Pradesh, 1991-2001: A District Level Analysis, Artha Vijnana, 49(1): 53-74.
  • Kuznets, S. (1973), Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections, American Economic Review, 63(3): 247-258.
  • Mazumdar, K. (2003), A New Approach to Human Development Index, Review of Social Economy, 61(4): 535-549.
  • Mondal, D. (2004), District Development Index of West Bengal 1991 and 2001, Occasional Paper No.16, Department of Economics with Rural Development (under DRS), Vidyasagar University.
  • ---------- (2008), On the Test of Significance of Linear Multiple Regression Coefficients, Communication in Statistics- Simulation and Computation, 37(4): 713-730.
  • National University of Educational Planning and Administration (NUEPA) (for various years), New Delhi, published District Information System for Education (DISE), DISE-2005-06 to DISE-2012-13.
  • Sarkar, S. (2010), Regional Variations of Social Sector Development: District Level Study of West Bengal State, Artha Vijnana, 52(1): 27-47.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (for various years), Human Development Report, New York, Oxford University Press.

Abstract Views: 185

PDF Views: 0




  • Educational Development in Blocks of Paschim Medinipur District (West Bengal) between 2005-2006 and 2012-2013:Panel Data Analysis through Education Index

Abstract Views: 185  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sanjoy Kr. Pattanayek
Vidyasagar University, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India
Debasish Mondal
Vidyasagar University, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India

Abstract


Education is considered as a crucial factor in determining the level of social development of a region directly and the level of its economic development indirectly. Educational development being multi-faceted, this paper constructs a composite Education Index for the Blocks of Paschim Medinipur District (West Bengal, India) over the period 2005-2006 to 2012-2013. Education Index is observed to have high inter-block as well as high inter-temporal variations. These variations are explained by factors like social status of the people, urbanization, employment status and demographic structure in a panel data framework. Urbanization, social status of the people and demographic structure are statistically significant both partially and individually. Work Participation Rate is statistically significant partially but not individually.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2016%2Fv58%2Fi1%2F121274